Water-absorbent polymer particles

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to a process for producing water-absorbent polymer particles by polymerizing droplets of a monomer solution in a surrounding heated gas phase and flowing the gas cocurrent through the polymerization chamber, wherein the temperature of the gas leaving the polymerization chamber is 130° C. or less, the gas velocity inside the polymerization chamber is at least 0.5 m/s, and the droplets are generated by using a droplet plate having a multitude of bores.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No.12/868,453, filed Aug. 25, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,481,159, whichclaims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No.61/316,889, filed Mar. 24, 2010, and U.S. Provisional Patent ApplicationNo. 61/239,808, filed Sep. 4, 2009, each incorporated herein byreference in its entirety.

The present invention relates to a process for producing water-absorbentpolymer particles by polymerizing droplets of a monomer solution in asurrounding gas phase under specific conditions.

The preparation of water-absorbent polymer particles is described in themonograph “Modern Superabsorbent Polymer Technology”, F. L. Buchholz andA. T. Graham, Wiley-VCH, 1998, on pages 71 to 103.

Being products which absorb aqueous solutions, water-absorbent polymerparticles are used to produce diapers, tampons, sanitary napkins andother hygiene articles, but also as water-retaining agents in marketgardening. Water-absorbent polymer particles are also referred to as“superabsorbent polymers” or “superabsorbents”.

The preparation of water-absorbent polymer particles by polymerizingdroplets of a monomer solution is described, for example, in EP 0 348180 A1, WO 96/40427 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 5,269,980, DE 103 14 466 A1, DE103 40 253 A1, DE 10 2004 024 437 A1, DE 10 2005 002 412 A1, DE 10 2006001 596 A1, WO 2008/009580 A1, WO 2008/009598 A1, WO 2008/009599 A1, WO2008/009612 A1, WO 2008/040715 A2, WO 2008/052971, and WO 2008/086976A1.

Polymerization of monomer solution droplets in a gas phase surroundingthe droplets (“dropletization polymerization”) affords roundwater-absorbent polymer particles of high mean sphericity (mSPHT). Themean sphericity is a measure of the roundness of the polymer particlesand can be determined, for example, with the Camsizer® image analysissystem (Retsch Technology GmbH; Haan; Germany). The water-absorbentpolymer particles obtained by dropletization polymerization aretypically hollow spheres.

It was an object of the present invention to provide water-absorbentpolymer particles having improved properties, i.e. comprisingwater-absorbent polymer particles having a high centrifuge retentioncapacity (CRC), a high absorption under a load of 49.2 g/cm² (AUHL), anda superior mechanical stability.

A further objective was providing water-absorbent polymer particleshaving a high bulk density and a narrow particle diameter distribution.

A further objective was providing water-absorbent polymer particleshaving excellent dosing and conveying properties which reduces dosingvariability and particle damage.

A further objective was providing water-absorbent polymer particleshaving excellent stability under mechanical stress conditions.

The object is achieved by a process for producing water-absorbentpolymer particles by polymerizing droplets of a monomer solution in asurrounding heated gas phase and flowing the gas cocurrent through thepolymerization chamber, wherein the temperature of the gas leaving thepolymerization chamber is 130° C. or less, the gas velocity inside thepolymerization chamber is at least 0.5 m/s, and the droplets aregenerated by using a droplet plate having a multitude of bores.

The water-absorbent polymer particles obtainable by dropletizationpolymerization typically have the shape of partially indented hollowspheres having one large cavity. The hollow spheres are sensitive tomechanical stress.

The present invention is based on the finding that decreasing thereaction temperature, increasing the gas velocity, and increasing theseparation of the bores has a strong impact on the structure of thewater-absorbent polymer particles prepared by dropletizationpolymerization.

The result of the specific conditions according to the process of thepresent invention are water-absorbent polymer particles having anincreased bulk density, a narrow particle diameter distribution, severalsmaller cavities instead of one large cavity, and a superior mechanicalstability as well as excellent dosing properties.

The present invention further provides water-absorbent polymer particlesobtainable by the process according to the invention, wherein thepolymer particles have a mean sphericity from 0.86 to 0.99, a bulkdensity of at least 0.58 g/cm³, and a average particle diameter from 250to 550 μm, wherein the particle diameter distribution is less than 0.7and the ratio of particles having one cavity to particles having morethan one cavity is less than 1.0.

The present invention further provides fluid-absorbent articles whichcomprise the inventive water-absorbent polymer particles.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a process scheme (with external fluidized bed);

FIG. 2 illustrates a process scheme (without external fluidized bed);

FIG. 3 illustrates an arrangement of the T_outlet measurement;

FIG. 4 illustrates an arrangement of the dropletizer units;

FIG. 5 illustrates a dropletizer unit (longitudinal cut);

FIG. 6 illustrates a dropletizer unit (cross sectional view);

FIG. 7 illustrates a process scheme (external thermal posttreatment andpostcrosslinking);

FIG. 8 illustrates a process scheme (external thermal posttreatment,postcrosslinking and coating);

FIG. 9 shows a swollen particle of type 1 with a cavity having adiameter of 0.94 mm; and

FIG. 10 shows a swollen particle of type 2 with more than 15 cavitieshaving diameters from less than 0.03 to 0.13 mm.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION A. Definitions

As used herein, the term “fluid-absorbent composition” refers to acomponent of the fluid-absorbent article which is primarily responsiblefor the fluid handling of the fluid-absorbent article includingacquisition, transport, distribution and storage of body fluids.

As used herein, the term “fluid-absorbent core” refers to afluid-absorbent composition comprising a fibrous material andwater-absorbent polymer particles. The fluid-absorbent core is primarilyresponsible for the fluid handling of the fluid-absorbent articleincluding acquisition, transport, distribution and storage of bodyfluids.

As used herein, the term “layer” refers to a fluid-absorbent compositionwhose primary dimension is along its length and width. It should beknown that the term “layer” is not necessarily limited to single layersor sheets of the fluid-absorbent composition. Thus a layer can compriselaminates, composites, combinations of several sheets or webs ofdifferent materials.

As used herein, the term “x-dimension” refers to the length, and theterm “y-dimension” refers to the width of the fluid-absorbentcomposition, layer, core or article. Generally, the term “x-y dimension”refers to the plane, orthogonal to the height or thickness of thefluid-absorbent composition, layer, core or article.

As used herein, the term “z-dimension” refers to the dimensionorthogonal to the length and width of the fluid-absorbent composition,layer, core or article. Generally, the term “z-dimension” refers to theheight of the fluid-absorbent composition.

As used herein, the term “chassis” refers to fluid-absorbent materialcomprising the upper liquid-pervious layer and the lowerliquid-impervious layer.

As used herein, the term “basis weight” indicates the weight of thefluid-absorbent core per square meter and it includes the chassis of thefluid-absorbent article. The basis weight is determined at discreteregions of the fluid-absorbent core: the front overall average is thebasis weight of the fluid-absorbent core 5.5 cm forward of the center ofthe core to the front distal edge of the core; the insult zone is thebasis weight of the fluid-absorbent core 5.5 cm forward and 0.5 cmbackwards of the center of the core; the back overall average is thebasis weight of the fluid-absorbent core 0.5 cm backward of the centerof the core to the rear distal edge of the core.

As used herein, the term “density” indicates the weight of thefluid-absorbent core per volume and it includes the chassis of thefluid-absorbent article. The density is determined at discrete regionsof the fluid-absorbent core: the front overall average is the density ofthe fluid-absorbent core 5.5 cm forward of the center of the core to thefront distal edge of the core; the insult zone is the density of thefluid-absorbent core 5.5 cm forward and 0.5 cm backwards of the centerof the core; the back overall average is the density of thefluid-absorbent core 0.5 cm backward of the center of the core to therear distal edge of the core.

Further, it should be understood, that the term “upper” refers tofluid-absorbent compositions which are nearer to the wearer of thefluid-absorbent article. Generally, the topsheet is the nearestcomposition to the wearer of the fluid-absorbent article, hereinafterdescribed as “upper liquid-pervious layer”. Contrarily, the term “lower”refers to fluid-absorbent compositions which are away from the wearer ofthe fluid-absorbent article. Generally, the backsheet is the compositionwhich is furthermost away from the wearer of the fluid-absorbentarticle, hereinafter described as “lower liquid-impervious layer”.

As used herein, the term “liquid-pervious” refers to a substrate, layeror laminate thus permitting liquids, i.e. body fluids such as urine,menses and/or vaginal fluids to readily penetrate through its thickness.

As used herein, the term “liquid-impervious” refers to a substrate,layer or a laminate that does not allow body fluids to pass through in adirection generally perpendicular to the plane of the layer at the pointof liquid contact under ordinary use conditions.

Fluid-absorbent articles may also comprise more than one fluid-absorbentcore, in a preferred manner comprising a double-core system including anupper core and a lower core, hereinafter called “primary core” and“secondary core”.

As used herein, the term “hydrophilic” refers to the wettability offibers by water deposited on these fibers. The term “hydrophilic” isdefined by the contact angle and surface tension of the body fluids.According to the definition of Robert F. Gould in the 1964 AmericanChemical Society publication “Contact angle, wettability and adhesion”,a fiber is referred to as hydrophilic, when the contact angle betweenthe liquid and the fiber, especially the fiber surface, is less than 90°or when the liquid tends to spread spontaneously on the same surface.

Contrarily, term “hydrophobic” refers to fibers showing a contact angleof greater than 90° or no spontaneously spreading of the liquid acrossthe surface of the fiber.

As used herein, the term “section” or “zone” refers to a definite regionof the fluid-absorbent composition.

As used herein, the term “article” refers to any three-dimensional solidmaterial being able to acquire and store fluids discharged from thebody. Preferred articles according to the present invention aredisposable fluid-absorbent articles that are designed to be worn incontact with the body of a user such as disposable fluid-absorbentpantiliners, sanitary napkins, catamenials, incontinence inserts/pads,diapers, training pant diapers, breast pads, interlabial inserts/padsand the like.

As used herein, the term “body fluids” refers to any fluid produced anddischarged by human or animal body, such as urine, menstrual fluids,faeces, vaginal secretions and the like.

B. Water-Absorbent Polymer Particles

The water-absorbent polymer particles are prepared by polymerizingdroplets of a monomer solution comprising

at least one ethylenically unsaturated monomer which bears acid groupsand may be at least partly neutralized,

at least one crosslinker,

at least one initiator,

a) optionally one or more ethylenically unsaturated monomerscopolymerizable with the monomers mentioned under a),

optionally one or more water-soluble polymers, and

water,

in a surrounding heated gas phase and flowing the gas cocurrent throughthe polymerization chamber, wherein the temperature of the gas leavingthe polymerization chamber is 130° C. or less, the gas velocity insidethe polymerization chamber is at least 0.5 m/s, and the droplets aregenerated by using a droplet plate having a multitude of bores.

The water-absorbent polymer particles are typically insoluble butswellable in water.

The monomers a) are preferably water-soluble, i.e. the solubility inwater at 23° C. is typically at least 1 g/100 g of water, preferably atleast 5 g/100 g of water, more preferably at least 25 g/100 g of water,most preferably at least 35 g/100 g of water.

Suitable monomers a) are, for example, ethylenically unsaturatedcarboxylic acids such as acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, maleic acid,and itaconic acid. Particularly preferred monomers are acrylic acid andmethacrylic acid. Very particular preference is given to acrylic acid.

Further suitable monomers a) are, for example, ethylenically unsaturatedsulfonic acids such as vinylsulfonic acid, styrenesulfonic acid and2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid (AMPS).

Impurities may have a strong impact on the polymerization. Preference isgiven to especially purified monomers a). Useful purification methodsare disclosed in WO 2002/055469 A1, WO 2003/078378 A1 and WO 2004/035514A1. A suitable monomer a) is according to WO 2004/035514 A1 purifiedacrylic acid having 99.8460% by weight of acrylic acid, 0.0950% byweight of acetic acid, 0.0332% by weight of water, 0.0203 by weight ofpropionic acid, 0.0001% by weight of furfurals, 0.0001% by weight ofmaleic anhydride, 0.0003% by weight of diacrylic acid and 0.0050% byweight of hydroquinone monomethyl ether.

Polymerized diacrylic acid is a source for residual monomers due tothermal decomposition. If the temperatures during the process are low,the concentration of diacrylic acid is no more critical and acrylicacids having higher concentrations of diacrylic acid, i.e. 500 to 10,000ppm, can be used for the inventive process.

The content of acrylic acid and/or salts thereof in the total amount ofmonomers a) is preferably at least 50 mol %, more preferably at least 90mol %, most preferably at least 95 mol %.

The acid groups of the monomers a) are typically partly neutralized,preferably to an extent of from 25 to 85 mol %, preferentially to anextent of from 50 to 80 mol %, more preferably from 60 to 75 mol %, forwhich the customary neutralizing agents can be used, preferably alkalimetal hydroxides, alkali metal oxides, alkali metal carbonates or alkalimetal hydrogen carbonates, and mixtures thereof. Instead of alkali metalsalts, it is also possible to use ammonia or organic amines, forexample, triethanolamine. It is also possible to use oxides, carbonates,hydrogencarbonates and hydroxides of magnesium, calcium, strontium, zincor aluminum as powders, slurries or solutions and mixtures of any of theabove neutralization agents. Examples for a mixture is a solution ofsodiumaluminate. Sodium and potassium are particularly preferred asalkali metals, but very particular preference is given to sodiumhydroxide, sodium carbonate or sodium hydrogen carbonate, and mixturesthereof. Typically, the neutralization is achieved by mixing in theneutralizing agent as an aqueous solution, as a melt or preferably alsoas a solid. For example, sodium hydroxide with water contentsignificantly below 50% by weight may be present as a waxy materialhaving a melting point above 23° C. In this case, metered addition aspiece material or melt at elevated temperature is possible.

Optionally, it is possible to add to the monomer solution, or tostarting materials thereof, one or more chelating agents for maskingmetal ions, for example iron, for the purpose of stabilization. Suitablechelating agents are, for example, alkali metal citrates, citric acid,alkali metal tatrates, alkali metal lactates and glycolates, pentasodiumtriphosphate, ethylenediamine tetraacetate, nitrilotriacetic acid, andall chelating agents known under the Trilon® name, for example Trilon® C(pentasodium diethylenetriaminepentaacetate), Trilon® D (trisodium(hydroxyethyl)-ethylenediaminetriacetate), and Trilon® M(methylglycinediacetic acid).

The monomers a) comprise typically polymerization inhibitors, preferablyhydroquinone monoethers, as inhibitor for storage.

The monomer solution comprises preferably up to 250 ppm by weight, morepreferably not more than 130 ppm by weight, most preferably not morethan 70 ppm by weight, preferably not less than 10 ppm by weight, morepreferably not less than 30 ppm by weight and especially about 50 ppm byweight of hydroquinone monoether, based in each case on acrylic acid,with acrylic acid salts being counted as acrylic acid. For example, themonomer solution can be prepared using acrylic acid having appropriatehydroquinone monoether content. The hydroquinone monoethers may,however, also be removed from the monomer solution by absorption, forexample on activated carbon.

Preferred hydroquinone monoethers are hydroquinone monomethyl ether(MEHQ) and/or alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E).

Suitable crosslinkers b) are compounds having at least two groupssuitable for cross-linking. Such groups are, for example, ethylenicallyunsaturated groups which can be polymerized by a free-radical mechanisminto the polymer chain and functional groups which can form covalentbonds with the acid groups of monomer a). In addition, polyvalent metalions which can form coordinate bond with at least two acid groups ofmonomer a) are also suitable crosslinkers b).

The crosslinkers b) are preferably compounds having at least twofree-radically polymerizable groups which can be polymerized by afree-radical mechanism into the polymer network. Suitable crosslinkersb) are, for example, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, diethylene glycoldiacrylate, polyethylene glycol diacrylate, allyl methacrylate,trimethylolpropane triacrylate, triallylamine, tetraallylammoniumchloride, tetraallyloxyethane, as described in EP 0 530 438 A1, di- andtriacrylates, as described in EP 0 547 847 A1, EP 0 559 476 A1, EP 0 632068 A1, WO 93/21237 A1, WO 2003/104299 A1, WO 2003/104300 A1, WO2003/104301 A1 and in DE 103 31 450 A1, mixed acrylates which, as wellas acrylate groups, comprise further ethylenically unsaturated groups,as described in DE 103 314 56 A1 and DE 103 55 401 A1, or crosslinkermixtures, as described, for example, in DE 195 43 368 A1, DE 196 46 484A1, WO 90/15830 A1 and WO 2002/32962 A2.

Suitable crosslinkers b) are in particular pentaerythritol triallylether, tetraallyloxyethane, N,N′-methylenebisacrylamide, 15-tuplyethoxylated trimethylolpropane, polyethylene glycol diacrylate,trimethylolpropane triacrylate and triallylamine.

Very particularly preferred crosslinkers b) are the polyethoxylatedand/or -propoxylated glycerols which have been esterified with acrylicacid or methacrylic acid to give di- or triacrylates, as described, forexample in WO 2003/104301 A1. Di- and/or triacrylates of 3- to 10-tuplyethoxylated glycerol are particularly advantageous. Very particularpreference is given to di- or triacrylates of 1- to 5-tuply ethoxylatedand/or propoxylated glycerol. Most preferred are the triacrylates of 3-to 5-tuply ethoxylated and/or propoxylated glycerol and especially thetriacrylate of 3-tuply ethoxylated glycerol.

The amount of crosslinker b) is preferably from 0.05 to 1.5% by weight,more preferably from 0.1 to 1% by weight, most preferably from 0.3 to0.6% by weight, based in each case on monomer a). On increasing theamount of crosslinker b) the centrifuge retention capacity (CRC)decreases and the absorption under a pressure of 21.0 g/cm² (AUL) passesthrough a maximum.

The initiators c) used may be all compounds which disintegrate into freeradicals under the polymerization conditions, for example peroxides,hydroperoxides, hydrogen peroxide, persulfates, azo compounds and redoxinitiators. Preference is given to the use of water-soluble initiators.In some cases, it is advantageous to use mixtures of various initiators,for example mixtures of hydrogen peroxide and sodium or potassiumperoxodisulfate. Mixtures of hydrogen peroxide and sodiumperoxodisulfate can be used in any proportion.

Particularly preferred initiators c) are azo initiators such as2,2′-azobis[2-(2-imidazolin-2-yl)propane] dihydrochloride and2,2′-azobis[2-(5-methyl-2-imidazolin-2-yl)propane] dihydrochloride, andphotoinitiators such as 2-hydroxy-2-methylpropiophenone and1-[4-(2-hydroxyethoxy)phenyl]-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-1-propan-1-one, redoxinitiators such as sodium persulfate/hydroxymethylsulfinic acid,ammonium peroxodisulfate/hydroxymethylsulfinic acid, hydrogenperoxide/hydroxymethylsulfinic acid, sodium persulfate/ascorbic acid,ammonium peroxodisulfate/ascorbic acid and hydrogen peroxide/ascorbicacid, photoinitiators such as1-[4-(2-hydroxyethoxy)phenyl]-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-1-propan-1-one, andmixtures thereof. The reducing component used is, however, preferably amixture of the sodium salt of 2-hydroxy-2-sulfinatoacetic acid, thedisodium salt of 2-hydroxy-2-sulfonatoacetic acid and sodium bisulfite.Such mixtures are obtainable as Brüggolite® FF6 and Brüggolite® FF7(Brüggemann Chemicals; Heilbronn; Germany).

The initiators are used in customary amounts, for example in amounts offrom 0.001 to 5% by weight, preferably from 0.01 to 2% by weight, basedon the monomers a).

Examples of ethylenically unsaturated monomers c) which arecopolymerizable with the monomers a) are acrylamide, methacrylamide,hydroxyethyl acrylate, hydroxyethyl methacrylate, dimethylaminoethylacrylate, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate, dimethylaminopropyl acrylateand diethylaminopropyl methacrylate.

Useful water-soluble polymers d) include polyvinyl alcohol,polyvinylpyrrolidone, starch, starch derivatives, modified cellulosesuch as methylcellulose or hydroxyethylcellulose, gelatin, polyglycolsor polyacrylic acids, polyesters and polyamides, polylactic acid,polyvinylamine, preferably starch, starch derivatives and modifiedcellulose.

For optimal action, the preferred polymerization inhibitors requiredissolved oxygen. Therefore, the monomer solution can be freed ofdissolved oxygen before the polymerization by inertization, i.e. flowingthrough with an inert gas, preferably nitrogen. It is also possible toreduce the concentration of dissolved oxygen by adding a reducing agent.The oxygen content of the monomer solution is preferably lowered beforethe polymerization to less than 1 ppm by weight, more preferably to lessthan 0.5 ppm by weight.

The water content of the monomer solution is preferably less than 65% byweight, preferentially less than 62% by weight, more preferably lessthan 60% by weight, most preferably less than 58% by weight.

The monomer solution has, at 20° C., a dynamic viscosity of preferablyfrom 0.002 to 0.02 Pa·s, more preferably from 0.004 to 0.015 Pa·s, mostpreferably from 0.005 to 0.01 Pa·s. The mean droplet diameter in thedroplet generation rises with rising dynamic viscosity.

The monomer solution has, at 20° C., a density of preferably from 1 to1.3 g/cm³, more preferably from 1.05 to 1.25 g/cm³, most preferably from1.1 to 1.2 g/cm³.

The monomer solution has, at 20° C., a surface tension of from 0.02 to0.06 N/m, more preferably from 0.03 to 0.05 N/m, most preferably from0.035 to 0.045 N/m. The mean droplet diameter in the droplet generationrises with rising surface tension.

Polymerization

The monomer solution is metered into the gas phase to form droplets,i.e. using a system described in WO 2008/069639 A1 and WO 2008/086976A1. The droplets are generated by means of a droplet plate.

A droplet plate is a plate having a multitude of bores, the liquidentering the bores from the top. The droplet plate or the liquid can beoscillated, which generates a chain of ideally monodisperse droplets ateach bore on the underside of the droplet plate. In a preferredembodiment, the droplet plate is not agitated.

The number and size of the bores are selected according to the desiredcapacity and droplet size. The droplet diameter is typically 1.9 timesthe diameter of the bore. What is important here is that the liquid tobe dropletized does not pass through the bore too rapidly and thepressure drop over the bore is not too great. Otherwise, the liquid isnot dropletized, but rather the liquid jet is broken up (sprayed) owingto the high kinetic energy. The Reynolds number based on the throughputper bore and the bore diameter is preferably less than 2000,preferentially less than 1600, more preferably less than 1400 and mostpreferably less than 1200.

The underside of the droplet plate has at least in part a contact anglepreferably of at least 60°, more preferably at least 75° and mostpreferably at least 90° with regard to water.

The contact angle is a measure of the wetting behavior of a liquid, inparticular water, with regard to a surface, and can be determined usingconventional methods, for example in accordance with ASTM D 5725. A lowcontact angle denotes good wetting, and a high contact angle denotespoor wetting.

It is also possible for the droplet plate to consist of a materialhaving a lower contact angle with regard to water, for example a steelhaving the German construction material code number of 1.4571, and becoated with a material having a larger contact angle with regard towater.

Useful coatings include for example fluorous polymers, such asperfluoroalkoxyethylene, polytetrafluoroethylene,ethylene-chlorotrifluoroethylene copolymers,ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene copolymers and fluorinated polyethylene.

The coatings can be applied to the substrate as a dispersion, in whichcase the solvent is subsequently evaporated off and the coating is heattreated. For polytetrafluoroethylene this is described for example inU.S. Pat. No. 3,243,321.

Further coating processes are to found under the headword “Thin Films”in the electronic version of “Ullmann's Encyclopedia of IndustrialChemistry” (Updated Sixth Edition, 2000 Electronic Release).

The coatings can further be incorporated in a nickel layer in the courseof a chemical nickelization.

It is the poor wettability of the droplet plate that leads to theproduction of monodisperse droplets of narrow droplet size distribution.

The droplet plate has preferably at least 5, more preferably at least25, most preferably at least 50 and preferably up to 750, morepreferably up to 500 bores, most preferably up to 250. The diameter ofthe bores is adjusted to the desired droplet size.

The separation of the bores is usually from 10 to 50 mm, preferably from12 to 40 mm, more preferably from 14 to 35 mm, most preferably from 15to 30 mm. Smaller separations of the bores cause agglomeration of thepolymerizing droplets.

The diameter of the bores is preferably from 50 to 500 μm, morepreferably from 100 to 300 μm, most preferably from 150 to 250 μm.

The temperature of the monomer solution as it passes through the bore ispreferably from 5 to 80° C., more preferably from 10 to 70° C., mostpreferably from 30 to 60° C.

A gas flows through the reaction chamber. The carrier gas is conductedthrough the reaction chamber in cocurrent to the free-falling dropletsof the monomer solution, i.e. from the top downward. After one pass, thegas is preferably recycled at least partly, preferably to an extent ofat least 50%, more preferably to an extent of at least 75%, into thereaction chamber as cycle gas. Typically, a portion of the carrier gasis discharged after each pass, preferably up to 10%, more preferably upto 3% and most preferably up to 1%.

The oxygen content of the carrier gas is preferably from 0.5 to 15% byvolume, more preferably from 1 to 10% by volume, most preferably from 2to 7% by weight.

As well as oxygen, the carrier gas preferably comprises nitrogen. Thenitrogen content of the gas is preferably at least 80% by volume, morepreferably at least 90% by volume, most preferably at least 95% byvolume. Other possible carrier gases may be selected from carbondioxide,argon, xenon, krypton, neon, helium. Any mixture of carrier gases may beused. The carrier gas may also become loaded with water and/or acrylicacid vapors.

The gas velocity is preferably adjusted such that the flow in thereaction chamber is directed, for example no convection currents opposedto the general flow direction are present, and is at least 0.5 m/s,preferably from 0.5 to 1.5 m/s, more preferably from 0.6 to 1.2 m/s,even more preferably from 0.65 to 1.0 m/s, most preferably from 0.7 to0.9 m/s.

The gas entrance temperature is controlled in such a way that the gasexit temperature, i.e. the temperature with which the gas leaves thereaction chamber, is 130° C. or less, preferably from 100 to 130° C.,more preferably from 105 to 128° C., even more preferably from 110 to126° C., most preferably from 115 to 125° C.

The water-absorbent polymer particles can be divided into threecategories: water-absorbent polymer particles of Type 1 are particleswith one cavity, water-absorbent polymer particles of Type 2 areparticles with more than one cavity, and water-absorbent polymerparticles of Type 3 are solid particles with no visible cavity.

The morphology of the water-absorbent polymer particles can becontrolled by the reaction conditions during polymerization.Water-absorbent polymer particles having a high amount of particles withone cavity (Type 1) can be prepared by using low gas velocities and highgas exit temperatures. Water-absorbent polymer particles having a highamount of particles with more than one cavity (Type 2) can be preparedby using high gas velocities and low gas exit temperatures.

Water-absorbent polymer particles having more than one cavity (Type 2)show an improved mechanical stability.

The reaction can be carried out under elevated pressure or under reducedpressure; preference is given to a reduced pressure of up to 100 mbarrelative to ambient pressure.

The reaction off-gas, i.e. the gas leaving the reaction chamber, may,for example, be cooled in a heat exchanger. This condenses water andunconverted monomer a). The reaction off-gas can then be reheated atleast partly and recycled into the reaction chamber as cycle gas. Aportion of the reaction off-gas can be discharged and replaced by freshgas, in which case water and unconverted monomers a) present in thereaction off-gas can be removed and recycled.

Particular preference is given to a thermally integrated system, i.e. aportion of the waste heat in the cooling of the off-gas is used to heatthe cycle gas.

The reactors can be trace-heated. In this case, the trace heating isadjusted such that the wall temperature is at least 5° C. above theinternal reactor temperature and condensation on the reactor walls isreliably prevented.

Thermal Posttreatment

The residual monomers in the water-absorbent polymer particles obtainedby dropletization polymerization can be removed by a thermalposttreatment in the presence of a gas stream. The residual monomers canbe removed better at relatively high temperatures and relatively longresidence times. What is important here is that the water-absorbentpolymer particles are not too dry. In the case of excessively dryparticles, the residual monomers decrease only insignificantly. Too higha water content increases the caking tendency of the water-absorbentpolymer particles. In order that the water-absorbent polymer particlesdo not dry too rapidly during the thermal posttreatment, the gas flowingin shall already comprise steam.

The thermal posttreatment can be done in an internal and/or an externalfluidized bed. An internal fluidized bed means that the product of thedropletization polymerization is accumulated in a fluidized bed at thebottom of the reaction chamber.

In the fluidized state, the kinetic energy of the polymer particles isgreater than the cohesion or adhesion potential between the polymerparticles.

The fluidized state can be achieved by a fluidized bed. In this bed,there is upward flow toward the water-absorbing polymer particles, sothat the particles form a fluidized bed. The height of the fluidized bedis adjusted by gas rate and gas velocity, i.e. via the pressure drop ofthe fluidized bed (kinetic energy of the gas).

The velocity of the gas stream in the fluidized bed is preferably from0.5 to 2.5 m/s, more preferably from 0.6 to 1.5 m/s, most preferablyfrom 0.7 to 1.0 m/s.

In a more preferred embodiment of the present invention the thermalposttreatment is done in an external mixer with moving mixing tools,preferably horizontal mixers, such as screw mixers, disk mixers, screwbelt mixers and paddle mixers. Suitable mixers are, for example, Beckershovel mixers (Gebr. Lödige Maschinenbau GmbH; Paderborn; Germany), Narapaddle mixers (NARA Machinery Europe; Frechen; Germany), Pflugschar®plowshare mixers (Gebr. Lödige Maschinenbau GmbH; Paderborn; Germany),Vrieco-Nauta Continuous Mixers (Hosokawa Micron BV; Doetinchem; theNetherlands), Processall Mixmill Mixers (Processall Incorporated;Cincinnati; U.S.A.) and Ruberg continuous flow mixers (Gebrüder RubergGmbH & Co KG, Nieheim, Germany). Ruberg continuous flow mixers, Beckershovel mixers and Pflugschar® plowshare mixers are preferred.

The moisture content of the water-absorbent polymer particles during thethermal posttreatment is preferably from 3 to 50% by weight, morepreferably from 6 to 30% by weight, most preferably from 8 to 20% byweight.

The temperature of the water-absorbent polymer particles during thethermal posttreatment is preferably from 60 to 140° C., more preferablyfrom 70 to 125° C., very particularly from 80 to 110° C.

The average residence time in the mixer used for the thermalposttreatment is preferably from 10 to 120 minutes, more preferably from15 to 90 minutes, most preferably from 20 to 60 minutes.

The steam content of the gas is preferably from 0.01 to 1 kg per kg ofdry gas, more preferably from 0.05 to 0.5 kg per kg of dry gas, mostpreferably from 0.1 to 0.25 kg per kg of dry gas.

The thermal posttreatment can be done in a discontinuous external mixeror a continuous external mixer.

The amount of gas to be used in the discontinuoius external mixer ispreferably from 0.01 to 5 Nm³/h, more preferably from 0.05 to 2 Nm³/h,most preferably from 0.1 to 0.5 Nm³/h, based in each case on kgwater-absorbent polymer particles.

The amount of gas to be used in the continuous external mixer ispreferably from 0.01 to 5 Nm³/h, more preferably from 0.05 to 2 Nm³/h,most preferably from 0.1 to 0.5 Nm³/h, based in each case on kg/hthroughput of water-absorbent polymer particles.

The other constituents of the gas are preferably nitrogen,carbondioxide, argon, xenon, krypton, neon, helium, air or air/nitrogenmixtures, more preferably nitrogen or air/nitrogen mixtures comprisingless than 10% by volume of oxygen. Oxygen may cause discoloration.

Postcrosslinking

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the polymer particlesare postcrosslinked for further improvement of the properties.

Postcrosslinkers are compounds which comprise groups which can form atleast two covalent bonds with the carboxylate groups of the polymerparticles. Suitable compounds are, for example, polyfunctional amines,polyfunctional amidoamines, polyfunctional epoxides, as described in EP0 083 022 A2, EP 0 543 303 A1 and EP 0 937 736 A2, di- or polyfunctionalalcohols as described in DE 33 14 019 A1, DE 35 23 617 A1 and EP 0 450922 A2, or β-hydroxyalkylamides, as described in DE 102 04 938 A1 andU.S. Pat. No. 6,239,230.

Polyvinylamine, polyamidoamines and polyvinylalcohole are examples ofmultifunctional polymeric postcrosslinkers.

In addition, DE 40 20 780 C1 describes cyclic carbonates, DE 198 07 502A1 describes 2-oxazolidone and its derivatives such as2-hydroxyethyl-2-oxazolidone, DE 198 07 992 C1 describes bis- andpoly-2-oxazolidinones, DE 198 54 573 A1 describes2-oxotetrahydro-1,3-oxazine and its derivatives, DE 198 54 574 A1describes N-acyl-2-oxazolidones, DE 102 04 937 A1 describes cyclicureas, DE 103 34 584 A1 describes bicyclic amide acetals, EP 1 199 327A2 describes oxetanes and cyclic ureas, and WO 2003/31482 A1 describesmorpholine-2,3-dione and its derivatives, as suitable postcrosslinkers.

Particularly preferred postcrosslinkers are ethylene carbonate, mixturesof propylene glycol, 1,3-propandiole, 1,4-butanediol, mixtures of1,3-propandiole and 1,4-butane-diole, ethylene glycol diglycidyl etherand reaction products of polyamides and epichlorohydrin.

Very particularly preferred postcrosslinkers are2-hydroxyethyl-2-oxazolidone, 2-oxazolidone and 1,3-propanediol.

In addition, it is also possible to use postcrosslinkers which compriseadditional polymerizable ethylenically unsaturated groups, as describedin DE 37 13 601 A1.

The amount of postcrosslinker is preferably from 0.001 to 2% by weight,more preferably from 0.02 to 1% by weight, most preferably from 0.05 to0.2% by weight, based in each case on the polymer.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, polyvalent cationsare applied to the particle surface in addition to the postcrosslinkersbefore, during or after the postcrosslinking.

The polyvalent cations usable in the process according to the inventionare, for example, divalent cations such as the cations of zinc,magnesium, calcium, iron and strontium, trivalent cations such as thecations of aluminum, iron, chromium, rare earths and manganese,tetravalent cations such as the cations of titanium and zirconium, andmixtures thereof. Possible counterions are chloride, bromide, sulfate,hydrogensulfate, carbonate, hydrogencarbonate, nitrate, hydroxide,phosphate, hydrogenphosphate, dihydrogenphosphate and carboxylate, suchas acetate, glycolate, tartrate, formiate, propionate and lactate, andmixtures thereof. Aluminum sulfate, aluminum acetate, and aluminumlactate are preferred. Apart from metal salts, it is also possible touse polyamines and/or polymeric amines as polyvalent cations. A singlemetal salt can be used as well as any mixture of the metal salts and/orthe polyamines above.

The amount of polyvalent cation used is, for example, from 0.001 to 1.5%by weight, preferably from 0.005 to 1% by weight, more preferably from0.02 to 0.8% by weight, based in each case on the polymer.

The postcrosslinking is typically performed in such a way that asolution of the postcrosslinker is sprayed onto the hydrogel or the drypolymer particles. After the spraying, the polymer particles coated withthe postcrosslinker are dried thermally and cooled, and thepostcrosslinking reaction can take place either before or during thedrying.

The spraying of a solution of the postcrosslinker is preferablyperformed in mixers with moving mixing tools, such as screw mixers, diskmixers and paddle mixers. Suitable mixers are, for example, horizontalPflugschar® plowshare mixers (Gebr. Lödige Maschinenbau GmbH; Paderborn;Germany), Vrieco-Nauta Continuous Mixers (Hosokawa Micron BV;Doetinchem; the Netherlands), Processall Mixmill Mixers (ProcessallIncorporated; Cincinnati; US) and Ruberg continuous flow mixers(Gebüuder Ruberg GmbH & Co KG, Nieheim, Germany). Ruberg continuous flowmixers and horizontal Pflugschar® plowshare mixers are preferred. Thepostcrosslinker solution can also be sprayed into a fluidized bed.

If an external mixer or an external fluidized bed is used for thermalposttreatment, the solution of the postcrosslinker can also be sprayedinto the external mixer or the external fluidized bed.

The postcrosslinkers are typically used as an aqueous solution. Theaddition of non-aqueous solvent can be used to adjust the penetrationdepth of the postcrosslinker into the polymer particles.

The thermal drying is preferably carried out in contact dryers, morepreferably paddle dryers, most preferably disk dryers. Suitable driersare, for example, Hosokawa Bepex® horizontal paddle driers (HosokawaMicron GmbH; Leingarten; Germany), Hosokawa Bepex® disk driers (HosokawaMicron GmbH; Leingarten; Germany), Holo-Flite® dryers (Metso MineralsIndustries Inc.; Danville; U.S.A.) and Nara paddle driers (NARAMachinery Europe; Frechen; Germany). Nara paddle driers and, in the caseof using polyfunctional epoxides, Holo-Flite® dryers are preferred.Moreover, it is also possible to use fluidized bed dryers.

The drying can be effected in the mixer itself, by heating the jacket orblowing in warm air. Equally suitable is a downstream dryer, for examplea shelf dryer, a rotary tube oven or a heatable screw. It isparticularly advantageous to mix and dry in a fluidized bed dryer.

Preferred drying temperatures are in the range from 50 to 220° C.,preferably from 100 to 180° C., more preferably from 120 to 160° C.,most preferably from 130 to 150° C. The preferred residence time at thistemperature in the reaction mixer or dryer is preferably at least 10minutes, more preferably at least 20 minutes, most preferably at least30 minutes, and typically at most 60 minutes.

It is preferable to cool the polymer particles after thermal drying. Thecooling is preferably carried out in contact coolers, more preferablypaddle coolers, most preferably disk coolers. Suitable coolers are, forexample, Hosokawa Bepex® horizontal paddle coolers (Hosokawa MicronGmbH; Leingarten; Germany), Hosokawa Bepex® disk coolers (HosokawaMicron GmbH; Leingarten; Germany), Holo-Flite® coolers (Metso MineralsIndustries Inc.; Danville; U.S.A.) and Nara paddle coolers (NARAMachinery Europe; Frechen; Germany). Moreover, it is also possible touse fluidized bed coolers.

In the cooler the polymer particles are cooled to temperatures of in therange from 20 to 150° C., preferably from 40 to 120° C., more preferablyfrom 60 to 100° C., most preferably from 70 to 90° C. Cooling using warmwater is preferred, especially when contact coolers are used.

Coating

To improve the properties, the water-absorbent polymer particles can becoated and/or optionally moistened. The internal fluidized bed, theexternal fluidized bed and/or the external mixer used for the thermalposttreatment and/or a separate coater (mixer) can be used for coatingof the water-absorbent polymer particles. Further, the cooler and/or aseparate coater (mixer) can be used for coating/moistening of thepostcrosslinked water-absorbent polymer particles. Suitable coatings forcontrolling the acquisition behavior and improving the permeability (SFCor GBP) are, for example, inorganic inert substances, such aswater-insoluble metal salts, organic polymers, cationic polymers andpolyvalent metal cations. Suitable coatings for improving the colorstability are, for example reducing agents and anti-oxidants. Suitablecoatings for dust binding are, for example, polyols. Suitable coatingsagainst the undesired caking tendency of the polymer particles are, forexample, fumed silica, such as Aerosil® 200, and surfactants, such asSpan® 20. Preferred coatings are aluminium monoacetate, aluminiumsulfate, aluminium lactate, Brüggolite® FF7 and Span® 20.

Suitable inorganic inert substances are silicates such asmontmorillonite, kaolinite and talc, zeolites, activated carbons,polysilicic acids, magnesium carbonate, calcium carbonate, calciumphosphate, barium sulfate, aluminum oxide, titanium dioxide and iron(II)oxide. Preference is given to using polysilicic acids, which are dividedbetween precipitated silicas and fumed silicas according to their modeof preparation. The two variants are commercially available under thenames Silica FK, Sipernat®, Wessalon® (precipitated silicas) andAerosil® (fumed silicas) respectively. The inorganic inert substancesmay be used as dispersion in an aqueous or water-miscible dispersant orin substance.

When the water-absorbent polymer particles are coated with inorganicinert substan-ces, the amount of inorganic inert substances used, basedon the water-absorbent polymer particles, is preferably from 0.05 to 5%by weight, more preferably from 0.1 to 1.5% by weight, most preferablyfrom 0.3 to 1% by weight.

Suitable organic polymers are polyalkyl methacrylates or thermoplasticssuch as polyvinyl chloride, waxes based on polyethylene, polypropylene,polyamides or polytetrafluoro-ethylene. Other examples arestyrene-isoprene-styrene block-copoly-mers or styrene-butadiene-styreneblock-copolymers.

Suitable cationic polymers are polyalkylenepolyamines, cationicderivatives of polyacrylamides, polyethyleneimines and polyquaternaryamines.

Polyquaternary amines are, for example, condensation products ofhexamethylenedi-amine, dimethylamine and epichlorohydrin, condensationproducts of dimethylamine and epichlorohydrin, copolymers ofhydroxyethylcellulose and diallyldimethylammo-nium chloride, copolymersof acrylamide and α-methacryloyloxyethyltrimethylammo-nium chloride,condensation products of hydroxyethylcellulose, epichlorohydrin andtrimethylamine, homopolymers of diallyldimethylammonium chloride andaddition products of epichlorohydrin to amidoamines. In addition,polyquaternary amines can be obtained by reacting dimethyl sulfate withpolymers such as polyethyleneimines, copolymers of vinylpyrrolidone anddimethylaminoethyl methacrylate or copolymers of ethyl methacrylate anddiethylaminoethyl methacrylate. The polyquaternary amines are availablewithin a wide molecular weight range.

However, it is also possible to generate the cationic polymers on theparticle surface, either through reagents which can form a network withthemselves, such as addition products of epichlorohydrin topolyamidoamines, or through the application of cationic polymers whichcan react with an added crosslinker, such as polyamines or polyimines incombination with polyepoxides, polyfunctional esters, polyfunctionalacids or polyfunctional (meth)acrylates.

It is possible to use all polyfunctional amines having primary orsecondary amino groups, such as polyethyleneimine, polyallylamine andpolylysine. The liquid sprayed by the process according to the inventionpreferably comprises at least one polyamine, for example polyvinylamineor a partially hydrolyzed polyvinylformamide.

The cationic polymers may be used as a solution in an aqueous orwater-miscible solvent, as dispersion in an aqueous or water-miscibledispersant or in substance.

When the water-absorbent polymer particles are coated with a cationicpolymer, the use amount of cationic polymer based on the water-absorbentpolymer particles is usually not less than 0.001% by weight, typicallynot less than 0.01% by weight, preferably from 0.1 to 15% by weight,more preferably from 0.5 to 10% by weight, most preferably from 1 to 5%by weight.

Suitable polyvalent metal cations are Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺, Al³⁺, Sc³⁺, Ti⁴⁺,Mn²⁺, Fe^(2+/3+), Co²⁺, Ni²⁺, Cu^(+/2+), Zn²⁺, Y³⁺, Zr⁴⁺, Ag⁺, La³⁺,Ce⁴⁺, Hf⁴⁺ and Au^(+/3+); preferred metal cations are Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺, Al³⁺,Ti⁴⁺, Zr⁴⁺ and La³⁺; particularly preferred metal cations are Al³⁺, Ti⁴⁺and Zr⁴⁺. The metal cations may be used either alone or in a mixturewith one another. Suitable metal salts of the metal cations mentionedare all of those which have a sufficient solubility in the solvent to beused. Particularly suitable metal salts have weakly complexing anions,such as chloride, hydroxide, carbonate, nitrate and sulfate. The metalsalts are preferably used as a solution or as a stable aqueous colloidaldispersion. The solvents used for the metal salts may be water,alcohols, dimethylfor-mamide, dimethyl sulfoxide and mixtures thereof.Particular preference is given to water and water/alcohol mixtures, suchas water/methanol, water/isopropanol, water/1,3-propanediole,water/1,2-propandiole/1,4-butanediole or water/propylene glycol.

When the water-absorbent polymer particles are coated with a polyvalentmetal cation, the amount of polyvalent metal cation used, based on thewater-absorbent polymer particles, is preferably from 0.05 to 5% byweight, more preferably from 0.1 to 1.5% by weight, most preferably from0.3 to 1% by weight.

Suitable reducing agents are, for example, sodium sulfite, sodiumhydrogensulfite (sodium bisulfite), sodium dithionite, sulfinic acidsand salts thereof, ascorbic acid, sodium hypophosphite, sodiumphosphite, and phosphinic acids and salts thereof. Preference is given,however, to salts of hypophosphorous acid, for example sodiumhypophos-phite, salts of sulfinic acids, for example the disodium saltof 2-hydroxy-2-sulfinato-acetic acid, and addition products ofaldehydes, for example the disodium salt of 2-hy-droxy-2-sulfonatoaceticacid. The reducing agent used can be, however, a mixture of the sodiumsalt of 2-hydroxy-2-sulfinatoacetic acid, the disodium salt of2-hydroxy-2-sulfonatoacetic acid and sodium bisulfite. Such mixtures areobtainable as Brüggolite® FF6 and Brüggolite® FF7 (Bröggemann Chemicals;Heilbronn; Germany).

The reducing agents are typically used in the form of a solution in asuitable solvent, preferably water. The reducing agent may be used as apure substance or any mixture of the above reducing agents may be used.

When the water-absorbent polymer particles are coated with a reducingagent, the amount of reducing agent used, based on the water-absorbentpolymer particles, is preferably from 0.01 to 5% by weight, morepreferably from 0.05 to 2% by weight, most preferably from 0.1 to 1% byweight.

Suitable polyols are polyethylene glycols having a molecular weight offrom 400 to 20000 g/mol, polyglycerol, 3- to 100-tuply ethoxylatedpolyols, such as trimethylol-propane, glycerol, sorbitol and neopentylglycol. Particularly suitable polyols are 7- to 20-tuply ethoxylatedglycerol or trimethylolpropane, for example Polyol TP 70® (Perstorp AB,Perstorp, Sweden). The latter have the advantage in particular that theylower the surface tension of an aqueous extract of the water-absorbentpolymer particles only insignificantly. The polyols are preferably usedas a solution in aqueous or water-miscible solvents.

When the water-absorbent polymer particles are coated with a polyol, theuse amount of polyol, based on the water-absorbent polymer particles, ispreferably from 0.005 to 2% by weight, more preferably from 0.01 to 1%by weight, most preferably from 0.05 to 0.5% by weight.

The coating is preferably performed in mixers with moving mixing tools,such as screw mixers, disk mixers, paddle mixers and drum coater.Suitable mixers are, for example, horizontal Pflugschar® plowsharemixers (Gebr. Lödige Maschinenbau GmbH; Paderborn; Germany),Vrieco-Nauta Continuous Mixers (Hosokawa Micron BV; Doetinchem; theNetherlands), Processall Mixmill Mixers (Processall Incorporated;Cincinnati; US) and Ruberg continuous flow mixers (Gebrüder Ruberg GmbH& Co KG, Nieheim, Germany). Moreover, it is also possible to use afluidized bed for mixing.

Agglomeration

The water-absorbent polymer particles can further selectivily beagglomerated. The agglomeration can take place after the polymerization,the thermal postreatment, the postcrosslinking or the coating.

Useful agglomeration assistants include water and water-miscible organicsolvents, such as alcohols, tetrahydrofuran and acetone; water-solublepolymers can be used in addition.

For agglomeration a solution comprising the agglomeration assistant issprayed onto the water-absorbing polymeric particles. The spraying withthe solution can, for example, be carried out in mixers having movingmixing implements, such as screw mixers, paddle mixers, disk mixers,plowshare mixers and shovel mixers. Useful mixers include for exampleLödige® mixers, Bepex® mixers, Nauta® mixers, Processall® mixers andSchugi® mixers. Vertical mixers are preferred. Fluidized bed apparatusesare particularly preferred.

Combination of Thermal Posttreatment, Postcrosslinking and OptionallyCoating

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the steps of thermalposttreatment and postcrosslinking are combined in one process step.Such combination allows the use of very reactive postcrosslinkerswithout having any risk of any residual postcross-linker in the finishedproduct. It also allows the use of low cost equipment and moreover theprocess can be run at low temperatures which is cost-efficient andavoids discoloration and loss of performance properties of the finishedproduct by thermal degradation.

Postcrosslinkers in this particular preferred embodiment are selectedfrom epoxides, aziridines, polyfuntional epoxides, and polyfunctionalaziridines. Examples are ethylene glycol diglycidyl ether, propyleneglycol diglycidyl ether, polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether,polyglycerol polyglycidyl ether, glycerol polyglycidyl ether, sorbitolpolyglycidyl ether, pentaerythritol polyglycidyl ether. Such compoundsare available for example under the trade name Denacol® (Nagase ChemteXCorporation, Osaka, Japan). These compounds react with the carboxylategroups of the water-absorbent polymers to form crosslinks already atproduct temperatures of less than 160° C.

The mixer may be selected from any of the equipment options cited in thethermal posttreatment section. Ruberg continuous flow mixers, Beckershovel mixers and Pflugschar® plowshare mixers are preferred.

In this particular preferred embodiment the postcrosslinking solution issprayed onto the water-absorbent polymer particles under agitation. Thetemperature of the water-absorbent polymer particles inside the mixer isat least 60° C., preferably at least 80° C., more preferably at least90° C., most preferably at least 100° C., and preferably not more than160° C., more preferably not more than 140° C., most preferably not morethan 115° C. Thermal posttreatment and postcrosslinking are performed inthe presence of a gas stream having a moisture content cited in thethermal posttreatment section.

Following the thermal posttreatment/postcrosslinking the water-absorbentpolymer particles are dried to the desired moisture level and for thisstep any dryer cited in the postcrosslinking section may be selected.However, as only drying needs to be accomplished in this particularpreferred embodiment it is possible to use simple and low cost heatedcontact dryers like a heated screw dryer, for example a Holo-Flite®dryer (Metso Minerals Industries Inc.; Danville; U.S.A.). Alternativelya fluidized bed may be used. In cases where the product needs to bedried with a predetermined and narrow residence time it is possible touse torus disc dryers or paddle dryers, for example a Nara paddle dryer(NARA Machinery Europe; Frechen; Germany), but designed for and operatedwith low pressure steam or heating liquid as the product temperatureduring drying does not need to exceed 160° C., preferably does not needto exceed 150° C., more preferably does not need to exceed 140° C., mostpreferably from 90 to 135° C.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, polyvalent cationscited in the postcrosslinking section are applied to the particlesurface before, during or after addition of the postcrosslinker by usingdifferent addition points along the axis of a horizontal mixer.

In a very particular preferred embodiment of the present invention thesteps of thermal posttreatment, postcrosslinking, and coating arecombined in one process step. Suitable coatings are cationic polymers,surfactants, and inorganic inert substances that are cited in thecoating section. The coating agent can be applied to the particlesurface before, during or after addition of the postcrosslinker also byusing different addition points along the axis of a horizontal mixer.

The polyvalent cations and/or the cationic polymers can act asadditional scavengers for residual postcrosslinkers. In a preferredembodiment of the present invention the postcrosslinkers are added priorto the polyvalent cations and/or the cationic polymers to allow thepostcrosslinker to react first.

The surfactants and/or the inorganic inert substances can be used toavoid sticking or caking during this process step under humidatmospheric conditions. A preferred surfactant is Span® 20. Preferredinorganic inert substances are precipitated silicas and fumed silcas inform of powder or dispersion.

The amount of total liquid used for preparing the solutions/dispersionsis typically from 0.01% to 25% by weight, preferably from 0.5% to 12% byweight, more preferably from 2% to 7% by weight, most preferably from 3%to 6% by weight, in respect to the weight amount of water-absorbentpolymer particles to be processed.

Preferred embodiments are depicted in FIGS. 1 to 8.

FIG. 1: Process scheme (with external fluidized bed)

FIG. 2: Process scheme (without external fluidized bed)

FIG. 3: Arrangement of the T_outlet measurement

FIG. 4: Arrangement of the dropletizer units

FIG. 5: Dropletizer unit (longitudinal cut)

FIG. 6: Dropletizer unit (cross sectional view)

FIG. 7: Process scheme (external thermal posttreatment andpostcrosslinking)

FIG. 8: Process scheme (external thermal posttreatment, postcrosslinkingand coating)

The reference numerals have the following meanings:

Drying gas inlet pipe

Drying gas amount measurement

Gas distributor

Dropletizer units

Cocurrent spray dryer, cylindrical part

Cone

T_outlet measurement

Tower offgas pipe

Baghouse filter

Ventilator

Quench nozzles

Condenser column, counter current cooling

Heat exchanger

Pump

Pump

Water outlet

Ventilator

Offgas outlet

Nitrogen inlet

Heat exchanger

Ventilator

Heat exchanger

Steam injection via nozzles

Water loading measurement

Conditioned internal fluidized bed gas

Internal fluidized bed product temperature measurement

Internal fluidized bed

Product discharge into external fluidized bed, rotary valve

External fluidized bed

Ventilator

External fluidized bed offgas outlet to baghouse filter

Rotary valve

Sieve

End product

Filtered air inlet

Ventilator

Heat exchanger

Steam injection via nozzles

Water loading measurement

Conditioned external fluidized bed gas

Static mixer

Static mixer

Initiator feed

Initiator feed

Monomer Feed

Fine particle fraction outlet to rework

T_outlet measurement (average temperature out of 3 measurements aroundtower circumference)

Dropletizer unit

Monomer premixed with initiator feed

Spray dryer tower wall

Dropletizer unit outer pipe

Dropletizer unit inner pipe

Dropletizer cassette

Teflon block

Valve

Monomer premixed with initiator feed inlet pipe connector

Droplet plate

Counter plate

Flow channels for temperature control water

Dead volume free flow channel for monomer solution

Dropletizer cassette stainless steel block

External thermal posttreatment

Optional coating feed

Postcrosslinker feed

Thermal dryer (postcrosslinking)

Cooler

Optional coating/water feed

Coater

Coating/water feed

The drying gas is feed via a gas distributor (3) at the top of the spraydryer as shown in FIG. 1. The drying gas is partly recycled (drying gasloop) via a baghouse filter (9) and a condenser column (12). Thepressure inside the spray dryer is below ambient pressure.

The spray dryer outlet temperature is preferably measured at threepoints around the circumference at the end of the cylindrical part asshown in FIG. 3. The single measurements (47) are used to calculate theaverage cylindrical spray dryer outlet temperature.

The product accumulated in the internal fluidized bed (27). Conditionedinternal fluidized bed gas is fed to the internal fluidized bed (27) vialine (25). The relative humidity of the internal fluidized bed gas ispreferably controlled by adding steam via line (23).

The spray dryer offgas is filtered in baghouse filter (9) and sent to acondenser column (12) for quenching/cooling. After the baghouse filter(9) a recuperation heat exchanger system for preheating the gas afterthe condenser column (12) can be used. Excess water is pumped out of thecondenser column (12) by controlling the (constant) filling level insidethe condenser column (12). The water inside the condenser column (12) iscooled by a heat exchanger (13) and pumped counter-current to the gasvia quench nozzles (11) so that the temperature inside the condensercolumn (12) is preferably from 20 to 100° C., more preferably from 30 to80° C., most preferably from 40 to 75° C. The water inside the condensercolumn (12) is set to an alkaline pH by dosing a neutralizing agent towash out vapors of monomer a). Aqueous solution from the condensercolumn (12) can be sent back for preparation of the monomer solution.

The condenser column offgas is split to the drying gas inlet pipe (1)and the conditioned internal fluidized bed gas (25). The gastemperatures are controlled via heat exchangers (20) and (22). The hotdrying gas is fed to the cocurrent spray dryer via gas distributor (3).The gas distributor (3) consists preferably of a set of plates providinga pressure drop of preferably 1 to 100 mbar, more preferably 2 to 30mbar, most preferably 4 to 20 mbar, depending on the drying gas amount.Turbulences and/or a centrifugal velocity can also be introduced intothe drying gas if desired by using gas nozzles or baffle plates.

The product is discharged from the internal fluidized bed (27) viarotary valve (28) into external fluidized bed (29). Conditioned externalfluidized bed gas is fed to the external fluidized bed (29) via line(40). The relative humidity of the external fluidized bed gas ispreferably controlled by adding steam via line (38). The product holdupin the internal fluidized bed (27) can be controlled via weir height orrotational speed of the rotary valve (28).

The product is discharged from the external fluidized bed (29) viarotary valve (32) into sieve (33). The product holdup in the externalfluidized bed (28) can be controlled via weir height or rotational speedof the rotary valve (32). The sieve (33) is used for sieving offovers/lumps.

The monomer solution is preferably prepared by mixing first monomer a)with a neutralization agent and secondly with crosslinker b). Thetemperature during neutralization is controlled to preferably from 5 to60° C., more preferably from 8 to 40° C., most preferably from 10 to 30°C., by using a heat exchanger and pumping in a loop. A filter unit ispreferably used in the loop after the pump. The initiators are meteredinto the monomer solution upstream of the dropletizer by means of staticmixers (41) and (42) via lines (43) and (44) as shown in FIG. 1.Preferably a peroxide solution having a temperature of preferably from 5to 60° C., more preferably from 10 to 50° C., most preferably from 15 to40° C., is added via line (43) and preferably an azo initiator solutionhaving a temperature of preferably from 2 to 30° C., more preferablyfrom 3 to 15° C., most preferably from 4 to 8° C., is added via line(44). Each initiator is preferably pumped in a loop and dosed viacontrol valves to each dropletizer unit. A second filter unit ispreferably used after the static mixer (42). The mean residence time ofthe monomer solution admixed with the full initiator package in thepiping before the droplet plates (57) is preferably less than 60 s, morepreferably less than 30 s, most preferably less than 10 s.

For dosing the monomer solution into the top of the spray dryerpreferably three dropletizer units are used as shown in FIG. 4.

A dropletizer unit consists of an outer pipe (51) having an opening forthe dropletizer cassette (53) as shown in FIG. 5. The dropletizercassette (53) is connected with an inner pipe (52). The inner pipe (53)having a PTFE block (54) at the end as sealing can be pushed in and outof the outer pipe (51) during operation of the process for maintenancepurposes.

The temperature of the dropletizer cassette (61) is controlled topreferably 5 to 80° C., more preferably 10 to 70° C., most preferably 30to 60° C., by water in flow channels (59) as shown in FIG. 6.

The dropletizer cassette has preferably from 10 to 1500, more preferablyfrom 50 to 1000, most preferably from 100 to 500, bores having adiameter of preferably from 50 to 500 μm, more preferably from 100 to300 μm, most preferably from 150 to 250 μm. The bores can be ofcircular, rectangular, triangular or any other shape. Circular bores arepreferred. The ratio of bore length to bore diameter is preferably from0.5 to 10, more preferably from 0.8 to 5, most preferably from 1 to 3.The droplet plate (57) can have a greater thickness than the bore lengthwhen using an inlet bore channel. The droplet plate (57) is preferablylong and narrow as disclosed in WO 2008/086976 A1. Multiple rows ofbores per droplet plate can be used, preferably from 1 to 20 rows, morepreferably from 2 to 5 rows.

The dropletizer cassette (61) consists of a flow channel (60) havingessential no stagnant volume for homogeneous distribution of thepremixed monomer and initiator solutions and two droplet plates (57).The droplet plates (57) have an angled configuration with an angle ofpreferably from 1 to 90°, more preferably from 3 to 45°, most preferablyfrom 5 to 20°. Each droplet plate (57) is preferably made of stainlesssteel or fluorous polymers, such as perfluoroalkoxyethylene,polytetrafluoroethylene, ethylene-chlorotrifluoroethylene copolymers,ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene copolymers and fluorinated polyethylene.Coated droplet plates as disclosed in WO 2007/031441 A1 can also beused. The choice of material for the droplet plate is not limited exceptthat droplet formation must work and it is preferable to use materialswhich do not catalyze the start of polymerization on its surface.

The throughput of monomer including initiator solutions per dropletizerunit is preferably from 150 to 2500 kg/h, more preferably from 200 to1000 kg/h, most preferably from 300 to 600 kg/h. The throughput per boreis preferably from 0.5 to 10 kg/h, more preferably from 0.8 to 5 kg/h,most preferably from 1 to 3 kg/h.

Water-Absorbent Polymer Particles

The present invention provides water-absorbent polymer particles havingmore than one cavity wherein the cavities have an inside diameter frompreferably 1 to 50 μm, more preferably 2 to 30 μm, even more preferably5 to 20 μm, most preferably 7 to 15 μm, while the remaining particleshave no visible cavities inside. Cavities with less than 1 μm diameterare considered as not visible cavities.

The present invention further provides water-absorbent polymer particlesobtainable by the process according to the invention, wherein thepolymer particles have a mean sphericity from 0.86 to 0.99, a bulkdensity of at least 0.58 g/cm³, and a average particle diameter from 250to 550 μm, wherein the particle diameter distribution is less than 0.7and the ratio of particles having one cavity to particles having morethan one cavity is less than 1.0.

In one particular preferred embodiment the present invention furtherprovides water-absorbent polymer particles obtainable by the processaccording to the present invention, which have a mean sphericity from0.86 to 0.99 and a bulk density of at least 0.58 g/cm³, and an averageparticle diameter from 250 to 550 μm, wherein the particle diameterdistribution is less than 0.7 and at least 50% of the water-absorbentpolymer particles have one or several small cavities per particle, whilethe remaining particles have no visible cavities inside.

The water-absorbent polymer particles obtainable by the processaccording to the invention have a mean sphericity from 0.86 to 0.99,preferably from 0.87 to 0.97, more preferably from 0.88 to 0.95, mostpreferably from 0.89 to 0.93. The sphericity (SPHT) is defined as

${{S\; P\; H\; T} = \frac{4\pi\; A}{U^{2}}},$where A is the cross-sectional area and U is the cross-sectionalcircumference of the polymer particles. The mean sphericity is thevolume-average sphericity.

The mean sphericity can be determined, for example, with the Camsizer®image analysis system (Retsch Technolgy GmbH; Haan; Germany):

For the measurement, the product is introduced through a funnel andconveyed to the falling shaft with a metering channel. While theparticles fall past a light wall, they are recorded selectively by acamera. The images recorded are evaluated by the software in accordancewith the parameters selected.

To characterize the roundness, the parameters designated as sphericityin the program are employed. The parameters reported are the meanvolume-weighted sphericities, the volume of the particles beingdetermined via the equivalent diameter xc_(min). To determine theequivalent diameter xc_(min), the longest chord diameter for a total of32 different spatial directions is measured in each case. The equivalentdiameter xc_(min) is the shortest of these 32 chord diameters. To recordthe particles, the so-called CCD-zoom camera (CAM-Z) is used. To controlthe metering channel, a surface coverage fraction in the detectionwindow of the camera (transmission) of 0.5% is predefined.

Water-absorbent polymer particles with relatively low sphericity areobtained by reverse suspension polymerization when the polymer beads areagglomerated during or after the polymerization.

The water-absorbent polymer particles prepared by customary solutionpolymerization (gel polymerization) are ground and classified afterdrying to obtain irregular polymer particles. The mean sphericity ofthese polymer particles is between approx. 0.72 and approx. 0.78.

The inventive water-absorbent polymer particles have a content ofhydrophobic solvent of preferably less than 0.005% by weight, morepreferably less than 0.002% by weight and most preferably less than0.001% by weight. The content of hydrophobic solvent can be determinedby gas chromatography, for example by means of the headspace technique.

Water-absorbent polymer particles which have been obtained by reversesuspension polymerization still comprise typically approx. 0.01% byweight of the hydrophobic solvent used as the reaction medium.

The inventive water-absorbent polymer particles have a dispersantcontent of typically less than 1% by weight, preferably less than 0.5%by weight, more preferably less than 0.1% by weight and most preferablyless than 0.05% by weight.

Water-absorbent polymer particles which have been obtained by reversesuspension polymerization still comprise typically at least 1% by weightof the dispersant, i.e. ethylcellulose, used to stabilize thesuspension.

The water-absorbent polymer particles obtainable by the processaccording to the invention have a bulk density preferably at least 0.6g/cm³, more preferably at least 0.65 g/cm³, most preferably at least 0.7g/cm³, and typically less than 1 g/cm³.

The average particle diameter of the inventive water-absorbent particlesis preferably from 320 to 500 μm, more preferably from 370 to 470 μm,most preferably from 400 to 450 μm.

The particle diameter distribution is preferably less than 0.65, morepreferably less than 0.62, more preferably less than 0.6.

Particle morphologies of the water-absorbent polymer particles areinvestigated in the swollen state by microscope analysis. Thewater-absorbent polymer particles can be divided into three categories:Type 1 are particles with one cavity having diameters typically from 0.4to 2.5 mm, Type 2 are particles with more than one cavity havingdiameters typically from 0.001 to 0.3 mm, and Type 3 are solid particleswith no visible cavities.

The ratio of particles having one cavity (Type 1) to particles havingmore than one cavity (Type 2) is preferably less than 0.7, morepreferably less than 0.5, most preferably less than 0.4. Lower ratioscorrelated with higher bulk densities.

The water-absorbent polymer particles obtainable by the processaccording to the invention have a moisture content of preferably from0.5 to 15% by weight, more preferably from 3 to 12% by weight, mostpreferably from 5 to 10% by weight.

In a particular preferred embodiment of the present invention theresidual content of unreacted monomer in the water-absorbent polymerparticles is reduced by thermal post-treatment with water vapor atelevated temperature. This thermal post-treatment may take place afterthe water-absorbent polymer particles have left the reaction chamber.The water absorbent particles may also be optionally stored in a buffersilo prior or after thermal post-treatment. Particularly preferredwater-absorbent polymer particles have residual monomer contents of notmore than 2000 ppm, typically not more than 1000 ppm, preferably lessthan 700 ppm, more preferably between 0 to 500 ppm, most preferablybetween 50 to 400 ppm.

The water-absorbent polymer particles obtainable by the processaccording to the invention have a centrifuge retention capacity (CRC) oftypically at least 20 g/g, preferably at least 25 g/g, preferentially atleast 28 g/g, more preferably at least 30 g/g, most preferably at least32 g/g. The centrifuge retention capacity (CRC) of the water-absorbentpolymer particles is typically less than 60 g/g.

The water-absorbent polymer particles obtainable by the processaccording to the invention have an absorbency under a load of 49.2 g/cm²(AUHL) of typically at least 15 g/g, preferably at least 16 g/g,preferentially at least 20 g/g, more preferably at least 23 g/g, mostpreferably at least 25 g/g, and typically not more than 50 g/g.

The water-absorbent polymer particles obtainable by the processaccording to the invention have a saline flow conductivity (SFC) oftypically at least 10×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g, usually at least 20×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g,preferably at least 50×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g, preferentially at least 80×10⁻⁷cm³s/g, more preferably at least 120×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g, most preferably atleast 150×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g, and typically not more than 300×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g.

The water-absorbent polymer particles obtainable by the processaccording to the invention have a free swell gel bed permeability (GBP)of typically at least 5 Darcies, usually at least 10 Darcies, preferablyat least 20 Darcies, preferentially at least 30 Darcies, more preferablyat least 40 Darcies, most preferably at least 50 Darcies, and typicallynot more than 250 Darcies.

Preferred water-absorbent polymer particles are polymer particles havinga centrifuge retention capacity (CRC) of at least 30 g/g, preferably ofat least 32 g/g, more preferably of at least 33 g/g, most preferably ofat least 34 g/g, an absorption under high load (AUHL) of at least 20g/g, preferably of at least 22 g/g, more preferably of at least 24 g/g,most preferably of at least 25 g/g, and a saline flow conductivity (SFC)of at least 10×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g, preferably of at least 12×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g, morepreferably of at least 14×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g, most preferably of at least15×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g.

Also preferred water-absorbent polymer particles are polymer particleshaving a centrifuge retention capacity (CRC) of at least 20 g/g,preferably of at least 24 g/g, more preferably of at least 26 g/g, mostpreferably of at least 28 g/g, an absorption under high load (AUHL) ofat least 15 g/g, preferably of at least 17 g/g, more preferably of atleast 19 g/g, most preferably of at least 20 g/g, and a saline flowconductivity (SFC) of at least 80×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g, preferably of at least110×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g, more preferably of at least 130×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g, mostpreferably of at least 150×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g.

Also preferred water-absorbent polymer particles are polymer particleshaving a centrifuge retention capacity (CRC) of at least 30 g/g,preferably of at least 31 g/g, more preferably of at least 32 g/g, mostpreferably of at least 33 g/g, an absorption under high load (AUHL) ofat least 16 g/g, preferably of at least 19 g/g, more preferably of atleast 21 g/g, most preferably of at least 23 g/g, and a saline flowconductivity (SFC) of at least 20×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g, preferably of at least30×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g, more preferably of at least 35×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g, mostpreferably of at least 40×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g.

The inventive water-absorbent polymer particles have an improvedmechanical stability and a narrow particle size distribution with smallparticles. Also, the inventive water-absorbent polymer particles have animproved processibility, a reduced tendency of segregation, a smallerparticle size dependent performance deviation, a reduced loss ofpermeability (SFC or GBP) and absorbency under high load (AUHL) undermechanical stress, and a reduced dust formation caused by abrasion.

The inventive water-absorbent polymer particles can be mixed with otherwater-absorbent polymer particles prepared by other processes, i.e.solution polymerization.

C. Fluid-Absorbent Articles

The fluid-absorbent article comprises of

(A) an upper liquid-pervious layer

(B) a lower liquid-impervious layer

(C) a fluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprising

from 5 to 90% by weight fibrous material and from 10 to 95% by weightwater-absorbent polymer particles;

preferably from 20 to 80% by weight fibrous material and from 20 to 80%by weight water-absorbent polymer particles;

more preferably from 30 to 75% by weight fibrous material and from 25 to70% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles;

most preferably from 40 to 70% by weight fibrous material and from 30 to60% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles;

(D) an optional acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C),comprising

from 80 to 100% by weight fibrous material and from 0 to 20% by weightwater-absorbent polymer particles;

preferably from 85 to 99.9% by weight fibrous material and from 0.01 to15% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles;

more preferably from 90 to 99.5% by weight fibrous material and from 0.5to 10% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles;

most preferably from 95 to 99% by weight fibrous material and from 1 to5% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles;

(E) an optional tissue layer disposed immediately above and/or below(C); and

(F) other optional components.

Fluid-absorbent articles are understood to mean, for example,incontinence pads and incontinence briefs for adults or diapers forbabies. Suitable fluid-absorbent articles including fluid-absorbentcompositions comprising fibrous materials and optionally water-absorbentpolymer particles to form fibrous webs or matrices for the substrates,layers, sheets and/or the fluid-absorbent core.

Suitable fluid-absorbent articles are composed of several layers whoseindividual elements must show preferably definite functional parametersuch as dryness for the upper liquid-pervious layer, vapor permeabilitywithout wetting through for the lower liquid-impervious layer, aflexible, vapor permeable and thin fluid-absorbent core, showing fastabsorption rates and being able to retain highest quantities of bodyfluids, and an acquisition-distribution layer between the upper layerand the core, acting as transport and distribution layer of thedischarged body fluids. These individual elements are combined such thatthe resultant fluid-absorbent article meets overall criteria such asflexibility, water vapor breathability, dryness, wearing comfort andprotection on the one side, and concerning liquid retention, rewet andprevention of wet through on the other side. The specific combination ofthese layers provides a fluid-absorbent article delivering both highprotection levels as well as high comfort to the consumer.

Liquid-Pervious Layer (A)

The liquid-pervious layer (A) is the layer which is in direct contactwith the skin. Thus, the liquid-pervious layer is preferably compliant,soft feeling and non-irritating to the consumer's skin. Generally, theterm “liquid-pervious” is understood thus permitting liquids, i.e. bodyfluids such as urine, menses and/or vaginal fluids to readily penetratethrough its thickness. The principle function of the liquid-perviouslayer is the acquisition and transport of body fluids from the wearertowards the fluid-absorbent core. Typically liquid-pervious layers areformed from any materials known in the art such as nonwoven material,films or combinations thereof. Suitable liquid-pervious layers (A)consist of customary synthetic or semisynthetic fibers or bicomponentfibers or films of polyester, polyolefins, rayon or natural fibers orany combinations thereof. In the case of nonwoven materials, the fibersshould generally be bound by binders such as polyacrylates. Additionallythe liquid-pervious layer may contain elastic compositions thus showingelastic characteristics allowing to be stretched in one or twodirections.

Suitable synthetic fibers are made from polyvinyl chloride, polyvinylfluoride, polytetrafluorethylene, polyvinylidene chloride, polyacrylics,polyvinyl acetate, polyethylvinyl acetate, non-soluble or solublepolyvinyl alcohol, polyolefins such as polyethylene, polypropylene,polyamides, polyesters, polyurethanes, polystyrenes and the like.

Examples for films are apertured formed thermoplastic films, aperturedplastic films, hydroformed thermoplastic films, reticulatedthermoplastic films, porous foams, reticulated foams, and thermoplasticscrims.

Examples of suitable modified or unmodified natural fibers includecotton, bagasse, kemp, flax, silk, wool, wood pulp, chemically modifiedwood pulp, jute, rayon, ethyl cellulose, and cellulose acetate.

Suitable wood pulp fibers can be obtained by chemical processes such asthe Kraft and sulfite processes, as well as from mechanical processes,such as ground wood, refiner mechanical, thermo-mechanical,chemi-mechanical and chemi-thermo-mechani-cal pulp processes. Further,recycled wood pulp fibers, bleached, unbleached, elementally chlorinefree (ECF) or total chlorine free (TCF) wood pulp fibers can be used.

The fibrous material may comprise only natural fibers or syntheticfibers or any combination thereof. Preferred materials are polyester,rayon and blends thereof, polyethylene, and polypropylene.

The fibrous material as a component of the fluid-absorbent compositionsmay be hydrophilic, hydrophobic or can be a combination of bothhydrophilic and hydrophobic fibers. The definition of hydrophilic isgiven in the section “definitions” in the chapter above. The selectionof the ratio hydrophilic/hydrophobic and accordingly the amount ofhydrophilic and hydrophobic fibers within fluid-absorbent compositionwill depend upon fluid handling properties and the amount ofwater-absorbent polymer particles of the resulting fluid-absorbentcomposition. Such, the use of hydrophobic fibers is preferred if thefluid-absorbent composition is adjacent to the wearer of thefluid-absorbent article, that is to be used to replace partially orcompletely the upper liquid-pervious layer, preferably formed fromhydrophobic nonwoven materials. Hydrophobic fibers can also be member ofthe lower breathable, but fluid-impervious layer, acting there as afluid-impervious barrier.

Examples for hydrophilic fibers are cellulosic fibers, modifiedcellulosic fibers, rayon, polyester fibers such as polyethylenterephthalate, hydrophilic nylon and the like. Hydrophilic fibers canalso be obtained from hydrophobic fibers which are hydrophilized by e.g.surfactant-treating or silica-treating. Thus, hydrophilic thermoplasticfibers derived from polyolefins such as polypropylene, polyamides,polystyrenes or the like by surfactant-treating or silica-treating.

To increase the strength and the integrity of the upper-layer, thefibers should generally show bonding sites, which act as crosslinksbetween the fibers within the layer.

Technologies for consolidating fibers in a web are mechanical bonding,thermal bonding and chemical bonding. In the process of mechanicalbonding the fibers are entangled mechanically, e.g., by water jets(spunlace) to give integrity to the web. Thermal bonding is carried outby means of rising the temperature in the presence of low-meltingpolymers. Examples for thermal bonding processes are spunbonding,through-air bonding and resin bonding.

Preferred means of increasing the integrity are thermal bonding,spunbonding, resin bonding, through-air bonding and/or spunlace.

In the case of thermal bonding, thermoplastic material is added to thefibers. Upon thermal treatment at least a portion of this thermoplasticmaterial is melting and migrates to intersections of the fibers causedby capillary effects. These intersections solidify to bond sites aftercooling and increase the integrity of the fibrous matrix. Moreover, inthe case of chemically stiffened cellulosic fibers, melting andmigration of the thermoplastic material has the effect of increasing thepore size of the resultant fibrous layer while maintaining its densityand basis weight. Upon wetting, the structure and integrity of the layerremains stable. In summary, the addition of thermoplastic material leadsto improved fluid permeability of discharged body fluids and thus toimproved acquisition properties.

Suitable thermoplastic materials including polyolefins such aspolyethylene and polypropylene, polyesters, copolyesters, polyvinylacetate, polyethylvinyl acetate, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinylidenechloride, polyacrylics, polyamides, copolyamides, polystyrenes,polyurethanes and copolymers of any of the mentioned polymers.

Suitable thermoplastic fibers can be made from a single polymer that isa monocomponent fiber. Alternatively, they can be made from more thanone polymer, e.g., bi-com-ponent or multicomponent fibers. The term“bicomponent fibers” refers to thermoplastic fibers that comprise a corefiber made from a different fiber material than the shell. Typically,both fiber materials have different melting points, wherein generallythe sheath melts at lower temperatures. Bi-component fibers can beconcentric or eccentric depending whether the sheath has a thicknessthat is even or uneven through the cross-sectional area of thebi-component fiber. Advantage is given for eccentric bi-component fibersshowing a higher compressive strength at lower fiber thickness. Furtherbi-com-ponent fibers can show the feature “uncrimped” (unbent) or“crimped” (bent), further bi-component fibers can demonstrate differingaspects of surface lubricity.

Examples of bi-component fibers include the following polymercombinations: polyethylene/polypropylene, polyethylvinylacetate/polypropylene, polyethylene/polyester, polypropylene/polyester,copolyester/polyester and the like.

Suitable thermoplastic materials have a melting point of lowertemperatures that will damage the fibers of the layer; but not lowerthan temperatures, where usually the fluid-absorbent articles arestored. Preferably the melting point is between about 75° C. and 175° C.The typical length of thermoplastic fibers is from about 0.4 to 6 cm,preferably from about 0.5 to 1 cm. The diameter of thermoplastic fibersis defined in terms of either denier (grams per 9000 meters) or dtex(grams per 10 000 meters). Typical thermoplastic fibers have a dtex inthe range from about 1.2 to 20, preferably from about 1.4 to 10.

A further mean of increasing the integrity of the fluid-absorbentcomposition is the spunbonding technology. The nature of the productionof fibrous layers by means of spunbonding is based on the directspinning of polymeric granulates into continuous filaments andsubsequently manufacturing the fibrous layer.

Spunbond fabrics are produced by depositing extruded, spun fibers onto amoving belt in a uniform random manner followed by thermal bonding thefibers. The fibers are separated during the web laying process by airjets. Fiber bonds are generated by applying heated rolls or hot needlesto partially melt the polymer and fuse the fibers together. Sincemolecular orientation increases the melting point, fibers that are nothighly drawn can be used as thermal binding fibers. Polyethylene orrandom ethylene/propylene copolymers are used as low melting bondingsites.

Besides spunbonding, the technology of resin bonding also belongs tothermal bonding subjects. Using this technology to generate bondingsites, specific adhesives, based on e.g. epoxy, polyurethane and acrylicare added to the fibrous material and the resulting matrix is thermaltreated. Thus the web is bonded with resin and/or thermal plastic resinsdispersed within the fibrous material.

As a further thermal bonding technology through-air bonding involves theapplication of hot air to the surface of the fibrous fabric. The hot airis circulated just above the fibrous fabric, but does not push throughthe fibrous fabric. Bonding sites are generated by the addition ofbinders. Suitable binders used in through-air thermal bonding includecrystalline binder fibers, bi-component binder fibers, and powders. Whenusing crystalline binder fibers or powders, the binder melts entirelyand forms molten droplets throughout the nonwoven's cross-section.Bonding occurs at these points upon cooling. In the case of sheath/corebinder fibers, the sheath is the binder and the core is the carrierfiber. Products manufactured using through-air ovens tend to be bulky,open, soft, strong, extensible, breathable and absorbent. Through-airbonding followed by immediate cold calendering results in a thicknessbetween a hot roll calendered product and one that has been through-airbonded without compression. Even after cold calendering, this product issofter, more flexible and more extensible than area-bond hot-calenderedmaterial.

Spunlacing (“hydroentanglement”) is a further method of increasing theintegrity of a web. The formed web of loose fibers (usually air-laid orwet-laid) is first compacted and prewetted to eliminate air pockets. Thetechnology of spunlacing uses multiple rows of fine high-speed jets ofwater to strike the web on a porous belt or moving perforated orpatterned screen so that the fibers knot about one another. The waterpressure generally increases from the first to the last injectors.Pressures as high as 150 bar are used to direct the water jets onto theweb. This pressure is sufficient for most of the nonwoven fibers,although higher pressures are used in specialized applications.

The spunlace process is a nonwovens manufacturing system that employsjets of water to entangle fibers and thereby provide fabric integrity.Softness, drape, conformability, and relatively high strength are themajor characteristics of spunlace nonwoven.

In newest researches benefits are found in some structural features ofthe resulting liquid-pervious layers. For example, the thickness of thelayer is very important and influences together with its x-y dimensionthe acquisition-distribution behavior of the layer. If there is furthersome profiled structure integrated, the acquisition-distributionbehavior can be directed depending on the three-dimensional structure ofthe layer. Thus 3D-polyethylene in the function of liquid-pervious layeris preferred.

Thus, suitable liquid-pervious layers (A) are nonwoven layers formedfrom the fibers above by thermal bonding, spunbonding, resin bonding orthrough-air bonding. Further suitable liquid-pervious layers are3D-polyethylene layers and spunlace.

Preferably the 3D-polyethylene layers and spunlace show basis weightsfrom 12 to 22 gsm.

Typically liquid-pervious layers (A) extend partially or wholly acrossthe fluid-absorbent structure and can extend into and/or form part ofall the preferred sideflaps, side wrapping elements, wings and ears.

Liquid-Impervious Layer (B)

The liquid-impervious layer (B) prevents the exudates absorbed andretained by the fluid-absorbent core from wetting articles which are incontact with the fluid-absorbent article, as for example bedsheets,pants, pyjamas and undergarments. The liquid-impervious layer (B) maythus comprise a woven or a nonwoven material, polymeric films such asthermoplastic film of polyethylene or polypropylene, or compositematerials such as film-coated nonwoven material.

Suitable liquid-impervious layers include nonwoven, plastics and/orlaminates of plastic and nonwoven. Both, the plastics and/or laminatesof plastic and nonwoven may appropriately be breathable, that is, theliquid-impervious layer (B) can permit vapors to escape from thefluid-absorbent material. Thus the liquid-impervious layer has to have adefinite water vapor transmission rate and at the same time the level ofimpermeability. To combine these features, suitable liquid-imperviouslayers including at least two layers, e.g. laminates from fibrousnonwoven having a specified basis weight and pore size, and a continuousthree-dimensional film of e.g. polyvinylalcohol as the second layerhaving a specified thickness and optionally having pore structure. Suchlaminates acting as a barrier and showing no liquid transport or wetthrough. Thus, suitable liquid-impervious layers comprising at least afirst breathable layer of a porous web which is a fibrous nonwoven, e.g.a composite web of a meltblown nonwoven layer or of a spunbondednonwoven layer made from synthetic fibers and at least a second layer ofa resilient three dimensional web consisting of a liquid-imperviouspolymeric film, e.g. plastics optionally having pores acting ascapillaries, which are preferably not perpendicular to the plane of thefilm but are disposed at an angle of less than 90° relative to the planeof the film.

Suitable liquid-impervious layers are permeable for vapor. Preferablythe liquid-impervious layer is constructed from vapor permeable materialshowing a water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) of at least about 100 gsmper 24 hours, preferably at least about 250 gsm per 24 hours and mostpreferred at least about 500 gsm per 24 hours.

Preferably the liquid-impervious layer (B) is made of nonwovencomprising hydrophobic materials, e.g. synthetic fibers or aliquid-impervious polymeric film comprising plastics e.g. polyethylene.The thickness of the liquid-impervious layer is preferably 15 to 30 μm.

Further, the liquid-impervious layer (B) is preferably made of alaminate of nonwoven and plastics comprising a nonwoven having a densityof 12 to 15 gsm and a polyethylene layer having a thickness of about 10to 20 μm.

The typically liquid-impervious layer (B) extends partially or whollyacross the fluid-absorbent structure and can extend into and/or formpart of all the preferred sideflaps, side wrapping elements, wings andears.

Fluid-absorbent Core (C)

The fluid-absorbent core (C) is disposed between the upperliquid-pervious layer (A) and the lower liquid-impervious layer (B).Suitable fluid-absorbent cores (C) may be selected from any of thefluid-absorbent core-systems known in the art provided that requirementssuch as vapor permeability, flexibility and thickness are met. Suitablefluid-absorbent cores refer to any fluid-absorbent composition whoseprimary function is to acquire, transport, distribute, absorb, store andretain discharged body fluids.

The top view area of the fluid-absorbent core (C) is preferably at least200 cm², more preferably at least 250 cm², most preferably at least 300cm². The top view area is the part of the core that is face-to-face tothe upper liquid-pervious layer.

According to the present invention the fluid-absorbent core can includethe following components:

an optional core cover

a fluid storage layer

an optional dusting layer

1. Optional Core Cover

In order to increase the integrity of the fluid-absorbent core, the coreis provided with a cover. This cover may be at the top and/or at thebottom of the fluid-absorbent core. Further, this cover may include thewhole fluid-absorbent core with a unitary sheet of material and thusfunction as a wrap. Wrapping is possible as a full wrap, a partial wrapor as a C-Wrap.

The material of the core cover may comprise any known type of substrate,including webs, garments, textiles, films, tissues and laminates of twoor more substrates or webs. The core cover material may comprise naturalfibers, such as cellulose, cotton, flax, linen, hemp, wool, silk, fur,hair and naturally occurring mineral fibers. The core cover material mayalso comprise synthetic fibers such as rayon and lyocell (derived fromcellulose), polysaccharides (starch), polyolefin fibers (polypropylene,polyethylene), polyamides, polyester, butadiene-styrene blockcopolymers, polyurethane and combinations thereof. Preferably, the corecover comprises synthetic fibers or tissue.

The fibers may be mono- or multicomponent. Multicomponent fibers maycomprise a homopolymer, a copolymer or blends thereof.

2. Fluid-Storage Layer

The fluid-absorbent compositions included in the fluid-absorbent corecomprise fibrous materials and water-absorbent polymer particles.

Fibers useful in the present invention include natural fibers andsynthetic fibers. Examples of suitable modified or unmodified naturalfibers are given in the chapter “Liquid-pervious Layer (A)” above. Fromthose, wood pulp fibers are preferred.

Examples of suitable synthetic fibers are given in the chapter“Liquid-pervious Layer (A)” above. The fibrous material may compriseonly natural fibers or synthetic fibers or any combination thereof.

The fibrous material as a component of the fluid-absorbent compositionsmay be hydrophilic, hydrophobic or can be a combination of bothhydrophilic and hydrophobic fibers.

Generally for the use in a fluid-absorbent core, which is the embeddedbetween the upper layer (A) and the lower layer (B), hydrophilic fibersare preferred. This is especially the case for fluid-absorbentcompositions that are desired to quickly acquire, transfer anddistribute discharged body fluids to other regions of thefluid-absorbent composition or fluid-absorbent core. The use ofhydrophilic fibers is especially preferred for fluid-absorbentcompositions comprising water-absorbent polymer particles.

Examples for hydrophilic fibers are given in the chapter“Liquid-pervious Layer (A)” above. Preferably, the fluid-absorbent coreis made from viscose acetate, polyester and/or polypropylene.

The fibrous material of the fluid-absorbent core may be uniformly mixedto generate a homogenous or inhomogeneous fluid-absorbent core.Alternatively the fibrous material may be concentrated or laid inseparate layers optionally comprising water-absorbent polymer material.Suitable storage layers of the fluid-absorbent core comprisinghomogenous mixtures of fibrous materials comprising water-absorbentpolymer material. Suitable storage layers of the fluid-absorbent coreincluding a layered core-system comprise homogenous mixtures of fibrousmaterials and comprise water-absorbent polymer material, whereby each ofthe layers may be built from any fibrous material by means known in theart. The sequence of the layers may be directed such that a desiredfluid acquisition, distribution and transfer results, depending on theamount and distribution of the inserted fluid-absorbent material, e.g.water-absorbent polymer particles. Preferably there are discrete zonesof highest absorption rate or retention within the storage layer of thefluid-absorbent core, formed of layers or inhomogeneous mixtures of thefibrous material, acting as a matrix for the incorporation ofwater-absorbent polymer particles. The zones may extend over the fullarea or may form only parts of the fluid-absorbent core.

Suitable fluid-absorbent cores comprise fibrous material andfluid-absorbent material. Suitable is any fluid-absorbent material thatis capable of absorbing and retaining body fluids or body exudates suchas cellulose wadding, modified and unmodified cellulose, crosslinkedcellulose, laminates, composites, fluid-absorbent foams, materialsdescry-bed as in the chapter “Liquid-pervious Layer (A)” above,water-absorbent polymer particles and combinations thereof.

Typically the fluid-absorbent cores may contain a single type ofwater-absorbent polymer particles or may contain water-absorbent polymerparticles derived from different kinds of water-absorbent polymermaterial. Thus, it is possible to add water-absorbent polymer particlesfrom a single kind of polymer material or a mixture of water-absorbentpolymer particles from different kinds of polymer materials, e.g. amixture of regular water-absorbent polymer particles, derived from gelpolymerization with water-absor-bent polymer particles, derived fromdropletization polymerization. Alternatively it is possible to addwater-absorbent polymer particles derived from inverse suspensionpolymerization.

Alternatively it is possible to mix water-absorbent polymer particlesshowing different feature profiles. Thus, the fluid-absorbent core maycontain water-absorbent polymer particles with uniform pH value, or itmay contain water-absorbent polymer particles with different pH values,e.g. two- or more component mixtures from water-absorbent polymerparticles with a pH in the range from about 4.0 to about 7.0.Preferably, applied mixtures deriving from mixtures of water-absorbentpolymer particles got from gel polymerization or inverse suspensionpolymerization with a pH in the range from about 4.0 to about 7.0 andwater-absorbent polymer particles got from dropletizationpolymerization.

Suitable fluid-absorbent cores are also manufactured from loose fibrousmaterials by adding fluid-absorbent particles and/or water-absorbentpolymer fibers or mixtures thereof. The water-absorbent polymer fibersmay be formed from a single type of water-absorbent polymer fiber or maycontain water-absorbent polymer fibers from different polymericmaterials. The addition of water-absorbent polymer fibers may bepreferred for being distributed and incorporated easily into the fibrousstructure and remaining better in place than water-absorbent polymerparticles. Thus, the tendency of gel blocking caused by contacting eachother is reduced. Further, water-absorbent polymer fibers are softer andmore flexible.

In the process of manufacturing the fluid-absorbent core,water-absorbent polymer particles and/or fluid-absorbent fibers arebrought together with structure forming compounds such as fibrousmatrices. Thus, the water-absorbent polymer particles and/orfluid-absorbent fibers may be added during the process of forming thefluid-absorbent core from loose fibers. The fluid-absorbent core may beformed by mixing water-absor-bent polymer particles and/orfluid-absorbent fibers with fibrous materials of the matrix at the sametime or adding one component to the mixture of two or more othercomponents either at the same time or by continuously adding.

Suitable fluid-absorbent cores including mixtures of water-absorbentpolymer particles and/or fluid-absorbent fibers and fibrous materialbuilding matrices for the incorporation of the fluid-absorbent material.Such mixtures can be formed homogenously, that is all components aremixed together to get a homogenous structure. The amount of thefluid-absorbent materials may be uniform throughout the fluid-absorbentcore, or may vary, e.g. between the central region and the distal regionto give a profiled core concerning the concentration of fluid-absorbentmaterial.

Techniques of application of the water-absorbent polymer materials intothe absorbent core are known to persons skilled in the art and may bevolumetric, loss-in-weight or gravimetric. Known techniques include theapplication by vibrating systems, single and multiple auger systems,dosing roll, weigh belt, fluid bed volumetric systems and gravitationalsprinkle and/or spray systems. Further techniques of insertion arefalling dosage systems consensus and contradictory pneumatic applicationor vacuum printing method of applying the fluid absorbent polymermaterials.

Suitable fluid-absorbent cores may also include layers, which are formedby the process of manufacturing the fluid-absorbent article. The layeredstructure may be formed by subsequently generating the different layersin z-direction.

Alternatively a core-structure can be formed from two or more preformedlayers to get a layered fluid-absorbent core. The layers may havedifferent concentrations of water-absorbent polymer material showingconcentrations in the range from about 10 to 95%. These uniform ordifferent layers can be fixed to each other at their adjacent planesurfaces. Alternatively, the layers may be combined in a way that aplurality of chambers is formed, in which separately water-absorbentpolymer material is incorporated.

Suitable preformed layers are processed as e.g. air-laid, wet-laid,laminate or composite structure.

Alternatively layers of other materials can be added, e.g. layers ofopened or closed celled foams or perforated films. Included do alsolaminates of at least two layers comprise said water-absorbent polymermaterial.

Further a composite structure can be formed from a carrier layer (e.g. apolymer film), onto which the water-absorbent polymer material isaffixed. The fixation can be done at one side or at both sides. Thecarrier layer may be pervious or impervious for body-fluids.

Alternatively, it is possible to add monomer solution after theformation of a layer or onto a carrier layer and polymerize the coatingsolution by means of UV-induced polymerization technologies. Thus, “insitu”-polymerization is a further method for the application ofwater-absorbent polymers.

Thus, suitable fluid-absorbent cores comprising from 5 to 90% by weightfibrous material and from 10 to 95% by weight water-absorbent polymerparticles; preferably from 20 to 80% by weight fibrous material and from20 to 80% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles; more preferablyfrom 30 to 75% by weight fibrous material and from 25 to 70% by weightwater-absorbent polymer particles and most preferably from 40 to 70% byweight fibrous material and from 30 to 60% by weight water-absorbentpolymer particles.

The quantity of water-absorbent polymer particles and/or fluid-absorbentfibers within the fluid-absorbent core is from 3 to 20 g, preferablyfrom 6 to 14 g, and from 8 to 12 g in the case of maxi-diapers, and inthe case of incontinence products up to about 50 g.

Typically fluid-absorbent articles comprising at least an upperliquid-pervious layer (A), at least a lower liquid-impervious layer (B)and at least one fluid-absorbent core between the layer (A) and thelayer (B) besides other optional layers. In order to increase thecontrol of body fluid absorption and/or to increase the flexibility inthe ratio weight percentages of water-absorbent polymer particles tofibrous matrix it may be advantageous to add one or more furtherfluid-absorbent cores. The addition of a second fluid-absorbent core tothe first fluid-absorbent core offers more possibilities in body fluidtransfer and distribution. Moreover higher quantities of discharged bodyfluids can be retained. Having the opportunity of combining severallayers showing different water-absorbent polymer concentration andcontent, it is possible to reduce the thickness of the fluid-absorbentarticle to a minimum even if there are several fluid-absorbent coresincluded.

Suitable fluid-absorbent cores may be formed from any material known inthe art which is designed to acquire, transfer, and retain dischargedbody fluids. The technology of manufacturing may also be anyone known inthe art. Preferred technologies include the application ofmonomer-solution to a transported fibrous matrix and therebypolymerizing, known as in-situ technology, or the manufacturing ofair-laid composites.

Suitable fluid-absorbent articles are including single or multi-coresystems in any combination with other layers which are typically foundin fluid-absorbent articles. Preferred fluid-absorbent articles includesingle- or double-core systems; most preferably fluid-absorbent articlesinclude a single fluid-absorbent core.

The fluid-absorbent core typically has a uniform size or profile.Suitable fluid-absorbent cores can also have profiled structures,concerning the shape of the core and/or the content of water-absorbentpolymer particles and/or the distribution of the water-absorbent polymerparticles and/or the dimensions of the different layers if a layeredfluid-absorbent core is present.

It is known that absorbent cores providing a good wet immobilization bycombining several layers, e.g. a substrate layer, layers ofwater-absorbent polymer and layers of thermoplastic material. Suitableabsorbent cores may also comprise tissue or tissue laminates. Known inthe art are single or double layer tissue laminates formed by foldingthe tissue or the tissue laminate onto itself.

These layers or foldings are preferably joined to each e.g. by additionof adhesives or by mechanical, thermal or ultrasonic bonding orcombinations thereof. Water-absorbent polymer particles may be comprisedwithin or between the individual layers, e.g. by forming separatewater-absorbent polymer-layers.

Thus, according to the number of layers or the height of a voluminouscore, the resulting thickness of the fluid-absorbent core will bedetermined. Thus, fluid-absorbent cores may be flat as one layer(plateau) or have three-dimensional profile.

Generally the upper liquid-pervious layer (A) and the lowerliquid-impervious layer (B) may be shaped and sized according to therequirements of the various types of fluid-absorbent articles and toaccommodate various wearer's sizes. Thus, the combination of the upperliquid-pervious layer and the lower liquid-impervious layer may have alldimensions or shapes known in the art. Suitable combinations have anhourglass shape, rectangular shape, trapezoidal shape, t- or doublet-shape or showing anatomical dimensions.

The fluid-absorbent core may comprise additional additives typicallypresent in fluid-absorbent articles known in the art. Exemplaryadditives are fibers for reinforcing and stabilizing the fluid-absorbentcore. Preferably polyethylene is used for reinforcing thefluid-absorbent core.

Further suitable stabilizers for reinforcing the fluid-absorbent coreare materials acting as binder.

In varying the kind of binder material or the amount of binder used indifferent regions of the fluid-absorbent core it is possible to get aprofiled stabilization. For example, different binder materialsexhibiting different melting temperatures may be used in regions of thefluid-absorbent core, e.g. the lower melting one in the central regionof the core, and the higher melting in the distal regions. Suitablebinder materials may be adhesive or non-adhesive fibers, continuously ordiscontinuously extruded fibers, bi-component staple fibers,nonelastomeric fibers and sprayed liquid binder or any combination ofthese binder materials.

Further, thermoplastic compositions usually are added to increase theintegrity of the core layer. Thermoplastic compositions may comprise asingle type of thermoplastic polymers or a blend of thermoplasticpolymers. Alternatively, the thermoplastic composition may comprise hotmelt adhesives comprising at least one thermoplastic polymer togetherwith thermoplastic diluents such as tackifiers, plasticizers or otheradditives, e.g. antioxidants. The thermoplastic composition may furthercomprise pressure sensitive hot melt adhesives comprising e.g.crystalline polypropylene and an amorphous polyalphaolefin or styreneblock copolymer and mixture of waxes.

Suitable thermoplastic polymers are styrenic block copolymers includingA-B-A triblock segments, A-B diblock segments and (A-B)_(n) radial blockcopolymer segments. The letter A designs non-elastomeric polymersegments, e.g. polystyrene, and B stands for unsaturated conjugateddiene or their (partly) hydrogenated form. Preferably B comprisesisoprene, butadiene, ethylene/butylene (hydrogenated butadiene),ethylene/pro-pylene (hydrogenated isoprene) and mixtures thereof.

Other suitable thermoplastic polymers are amorphous polyolefins,amorphous polyalphaolefins and metallocene polyolefins.

Concerning odor control, perfumes and/or odor control additives areoptionally added. Suitable odor control additives are all substances ofreducing odor developed in carrying fluid-absorbent articles over timeknown in the art. Thus, suitable odor control additives are inorganicmaterials, such as zeolites, activated carbon, bentonite, silica,aerosile, kieselguhr, clay; chelants such as ethylenediamine tetraaceticacid (EDTA), cyclodextrins, aminopolycarbonic acids, ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonic acid, aminophosphate, polyfunctional aromates,N,N-disuccinic acid.

Suitable odor control additives are further antimicrobial agents such asquaternary ammonium, phenolic, amide and nitro compounds and mixturesthereof; bactericides such as silver salts, zinc salts, cetylpyridiniumchloride and/or triclosan as well as surfactants having an HLB value ofless than 12.

Suitable odor control additives are further compounds with anhydridegroups such as maleic-, itaconic-, polymaleic- or polyitaconicanhydride, copolymers of maleic acid with C₂-C₈ olefins or styrene,polymaleic anhydride or copolymers of maleic anhydride with isobutene,di-isobutene or styrene, compounds with acid groups such as ascorbic,benzoic, citric, salicylic or sorbic acid and fluid-soluble polymers ofmonomers with acid groups, homo- or co-polymers of C₃-C₅mono-unsaturated carboxylic acids.

Suitable odor control additives are further perfumes such as allylcaproate, allyl cyclohexaneacetate, allyl cyclohexanepropionate, allylheptanoate, amyl acetate, amyl propionate, anethol, anixic aldehyde,anisole, benzaldehyde, benzyl acetete, benzyl acetone, benzyl alcohole,benzyl butyrate, benzyl formate, camphene, camphor gum, laevo-carveol,cinnamyl formate, cis-jasmone, citral, citronellol and its derivatives,cuminic alcohol and its derivatives, cyclal C, dimethyl benzyl carbinoland its derivatives, dimethyl octanol and its derivatives, eucalyptol,geranyl derivatives, lavandulyl acetete, ligustral, d-limonene,linalool, linalyl derivatives, menthone and its derivatives, myrcene andits derivatives, neral, nerol, p-cresol, p-cymene, orange terpenes,alpha-ponene, 4-terpineol, thymol etc.

Masking agents are also used as odor control additives. Masking agentsare in solid wall material encapsulated perfumes. Preferably, the wallmaterial comprises a fluid-soluble cellular matrix which is used fortime-delay release of the perfume ingredient.

Further suitable odor control additives are transition metals such asCu, Ag, and Zn, enzymes such as urease-inhibitors, starch, pH bufferingmaterial, chitin, green tea plant extracts, ion exchange resin,carbonate, bicarbonate, phosphate, sulfate or mixtures thereof.

Preferred odor control additives are green tea plant extracts, silica,zeolite, carbon, starch, chelating agent, pH buffering material, chitin,kieselguhr, clay, ion exchange resin, carbonate, bicarbonate, phosphate,sulfate, masking agent or mixtures thereof. Suitable concentrations ofodor control additives are from about 0.5 to about 300 gsm.

Newest developments propose the addition of wetness indicationadditives. Besides electrical monitoring the wetness in thefluid-absorbent article, wetness indication additives comprising a hotmelt adhesive with a wetness indicator are known. The wetness indicationadditive changes the colour from yellow to a relatively dark and deepblue. This colour change is readily perceivable through theliquid-impervious outer material of the fluid-absorbent article.Existing wetness indication is also achieved via application of watersoluble ink patterned on the backsheet which disappears when wet.

Suitable wetness indication additives comprising a mixture of sorbitanmonooleate and polyethoxylated hydrogenated castor oil. Preferably, theamount of the wetness indication additive is in the range of about 1 to5% by weight related to the weight of the fluid-absorbent core.

The basis weight of the fluid-absorbent core is in the range of 600 to1200 gsm. The density of the fluid-absorbent core is in the range of 0.1to 0.25 g/cm³. The thickness of the fluid-absorbent core is in the caseof diapers in the range of 1 to 5 mm, preferably 1.5 to 3 mm, in thecase of incontinence products in the range of 3 to 15 mm.

3. Optional Dusting Layer

An optional component for inclusion into the absorbent core is a dustinglayer adjacent to. The dusting layer is a fibrous layer and may beplaced on the top and/or the bottom of the absorbent core. Typically,the dusting layer is underlying the storage layer. This underlying layeris referred to as a dusting layer, since it serves as carrier fordeposited water-absorbent polymer particles during the manufacturingprocess of the fluid-absor-bent core. If the water-absorbent polymermaterial is in the form of macrostructures, films or flakes, theinsertion of a dusting layer is not necessary. In the case ofwater-absorbent polymer particles derived from dropletizationpolymerization, the particles have a smooth surface with no edges. Alsoin this case, the addition of a dusting layer to the fluid-absorbentcore is not necessary. On the other side, as a great advantage thedusting layer provides some additional fluid-handling properties such aswicking performance and may offer reduced incidence of pin-holing and orpock marking of the liquid impervious layer (B).

Preferably, the dusting layer is a fibrous layer comprising fluff(cellulose fibers).

Optional Acquisition-Distribution Layer (D)

An optional acquisition-distribution layer (D) is located between theupper layer (A) and the fluid-absorbent core (C) and is preferablyconstructed to efficiently acquire discharged body fluids and totransfer and distribute them to other regions of the fluid-absorbentcomposition or to other layers, where the body fluids are immobilizedand stored. Thus, the upper layer transfers the discharged liquid to theacquisition-distribu-tion layer (D) for distributing it to thefluid-absorbent core.

The acquisition-distribution layer comprises fibrous material andoptionally water-absorbent polymer particles.

The fibrous material may be hydrophilic, hydrophobic or can be acombination of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic fibers. It may bederived from natural fibers, synthetic fibers or a combination of both.

Suitable acquisition-distribution layers are formed from cellulosicfibers and/or modified cellulosic fibers and/or synthetics orcombinations thereof. Thus, suitable acquisition-distribution layers maycontain cellulosic fibers, in particular wood pulp fluff. Examples offurther suitable hydrophilic, hydrophobic fibers, as well as modified orunmodified natural fibers are given in the chapter “Liquid-perviousLayer (A)” above.

Especially for providing both fluid acquisition and distributionproperties, the use of modified cellulosic fibers is preferred. Examplesfor modified cellulosic fibers are chemically treated cellulosic fibers,especially chemically stiffened cellulosic fibers. The term “chemicallystiffened cellulosic fibers” means cellulosic fibers that have beenstiffened by chemical means to increase the stiffness of the fibers.Such means include the addition of chemical stiffening agent in the formof coatings and impregnates. Suitable polymeric stiffening agents caninclude: cationic modified starches having nitrogen-containing groups,latexes, wet strength resins such as polyamide-epichlorohydrin resin,polyacrylamide, urea formaldehyde and melamine formaldehyde resins andpolyethylenimine resins.

Stiffening may also include altering the chemical structure, e.g. bycrosslinking polymer chains. Thus crosslinking agents can be applied tothe fibers that are caused to chemically form intrafiber crosslinkbonds. Further cellulosic fibers may be stiffened by cross-link bonds inindividualized form. Suitable chemical stiffening agents are typicallymonomeric crosslinking agents including C₂-C₈ dialdehyde, C₂-C₈monoaldehyde having an acid functionality, and especially C₂-C₉polycarboxylic acids.

Preferably the modified cellulosic fibers are chemically treatedcellulosic fibers. Especially preferred are curly fibers which can beobtained by treating cellulosic fibers with citric acid. Preferably thebasis weight of cellulosic fibers and modified cellulosic fibers is from50 to 200 gsm.

Suitable acquisition-distribution layers further include syntheticfibers. Known examples of synthetic fibers are found in the Chapter“Liquid-pervious Layer (A)” above. 3D-poly-ethylene in the function ofacquisition-distribution layer is preferred.

Further, as in the case of cellulosic fibers, hydrophilic syntheticfibers are preferred. Hydrophilic synthetic fibers may be obtained bychemical modification of hydrophobic fibers. Preferably,hydrophilization is carried out by surfactant treatment of hydrophobicfibers. Thus the surface of the hydrophobic fiber can be renderedhydrophilic by treatment with a nonionic or ionic surfactant, e.g., byspraying the fiber with a surfactant or by dipping the fiber into asurfactant. Further preferred are permanent hydrophilic syntheticfibers.

The fibrous material of the acquisition-distribution layer may be fixedto increase the strength and the integrity of the layer. Technologiesfor consolidating fibers in a web are mechanical bonding, thermalbonding and chemical bonding. Detailed description of the differentmethods of increasing the integrity of the web is given in the Chapter“Liquid-pervious Layer (A)” above.

Preferred acquisition-distribution layers comprise fibrous material andwater-absorbent polymer particles distributed within. Thewater-absorbent polymer particles may be added during the process offorming the layer from loose fibers, or, alternatively, it is possibleto add monomer solution after the formation of the layer and polymerizethe coating solution by means of UV-induced polymerization technologies.Thus, “in situ”-polymerization is a further method for the applicationof water-absorbent polymers.

Thus, suitable acquisition-distribution layers comprising from 80 to100% by weight fibrous material and from 0 to 20% by weightwater-absorbent polymer particles; preferably from 85 to 99.9% by weightfibrous material and from 0.1 to 15% by weight water-absorbent polymerparticles; more preferably from 90 to 99.5% by weight fibrous materialand from 0.5 to 10% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles; andmost preferably from 95 to 99% by weight fibrous material and from 1 to5% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles.

Preferred acquisition-distribution layers show basis weights in therange from 20 to 200 gsm, most preferred in the range from 40 to 50 gsm,depending on the concentration of water-absorbent polymer particles.

Optional Tissue Layer (E)

An optional tissue layer is disposed immediately above and/or below (C).

The material of the tissue layer may comprise any known type ofsubstrate, including webs, garments, textiles and films. The tissuelayer may comprise natural fibers, such as cellulose, cotton, flax,linen, hemp, wool, silk, fur, hair and naturally occurring mineralfibers. The tissue layer may also comprise synthetic fibers such asrayon and lyocell (derived from cellulose), polysaccharides (starch),polyolefin fibers (polypropylene, polyethylene), polyamides, polyester,butadiene-styrene block copolymers, polyurethane and combinationsthereof. Preferably, the tissue layer comprises cellulose fibers.

Other Optional Components (F)

1. Leg Cuff

Typical leg cuffs comprising nonwoven materials which can be formed bydirect extrusion processes during which the fibers and the nonwovenmaterials are formed at the same time, or by laying processes ofpreformed fibers which can be laid into nonwoven materials at a laterpoint of time. Examples for direct extrusion processes includespunbonding, meltblowing, solvent spinning, electrospinning andcombinations thereof. Examples of laying processes include wet-layingand dry-laying (e.g. air-laying, carding) methods. Combinations of theprocesses above include spunbond-meltblown-spunbond (sms),spunbond-meltblow-meltblown-spunbond (smms), spunbond-carded (sc),spunbond-airlaid (sa), meltblown-airlaid (ma) and combinations thereof.The combinations including direct extrusion can be combined at the samepoint in time or at a subsequent point in time. In the examples above,one or more individual layers can be produced by each process. Thus,“sms” means a three layer nonwoven material, “smsms” or “ssmms” means afive layer nonwoven material. Usually, small type letters (sms)designate individual layers, whereas capital letters (SMS) designate thecompilation of similar adjacent layers.

Further, suitable leg cuffs are provided with elastic strands.

Preferred are leg cuffs from synthetic fibers showing the layercombinations sms, smms or smsms. Preferred are nonwovens with thedensity of 13 to 17 gsm. Preferably leg cuffs are provided with twoelastic strands.

2. Elastics

The elastics are used for securely holding and flexibly closing thefluid-absorbent article around the wearer's body, e.g. the waist and thelegs to improve containment and fit. Leg elastics are placed between theouter and inner layers or the fluid-absorbent article, or between theouter cover and the bodyside liner. Suitable elastics comprising sheets,ribbons or strands of thermoplastic polyurethane, elastomeric materials,poly(ether-amide) block copolymers, thermoplastic rubbers,styrene-butadiene copolymers, silicon rubbers, natural rubbers,synthetic rubbers, styrene isoprene copolymers, styrene ethylenebutylene copolymers, nylon copolymers, spandex fibers comprisingsegmented polyurethane and/or ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer. Theelastics may be secured to a substrate after being stretched, or securedto a stretched substrate. Otherwise, the elastics may be secured to asubstrate and then elastisized or shrunk, e.g. by the application ofheat.

3. Closing System

The closing system includes tape tabs, landing zone, elastomerics, pullups and the belt system.

At least a part of the first waist region is attached to a part of thesecond waist region by the closing system to hold the fluid-absorbentarticle in place and to form leg openings and the waist of thefluid-absorbent article. Preferably the fluid-absorbent article isprovided with a re-closable closing system.

The closing system is either re-sealable or permanent, including anymaterial suitable for such a use, e.g. plastics, elastics, films, foams,nonwoven substrates, woven substrates, paper, tissue, laminates, fiberreinforced plastics and the like, or combinations thereof. Preferablythe closing system includes flexible materials and works smooth andsoftly without irritating the wearer's skin.

One part of the closing elements is an adhesive tape, or comprises apair of laterally extending tabs disposed on the lateral edges of thefirst waist region. Tape tabs are typically attached to the front bodypanel and extend laterally from each corner of the first waistband.These tape tabs include an adhesive inwardly facing surface which istypically protected prior to use by a thin, removable cover sheet.

Suitable tape tabs may be formed of thermoplastic polymers such aspolyethylene, polyurethane, polystyrene, polycarbonate, polyester,ethylene vinyl acetate, ethylene vinyl alcohol, ethylene vinyl acetateacrylate or ethylene acrylic acid copolymers.

Suitable closing systems comprise further a hook portion of a hook andloop fastener and the target devices comprise the loop portion of a hookand loop fastener.

Suitable mechanical closing systems including a landing zone. Mechanicalclosing systems may fasten directly into the outer cover. The landingzone may act as an area of the fluid-absorbent article into which it isdesirable to engage the tape tabs. The landing zone may include a basematerial and a plurality of tape tabs. The tape tabs may be embedded inthe base material of the landing zone. The base material may include aloop material. The loop material may include a backing material and alayer of a nonwoven spunbond web attacked to the backing material.

Thus suitable landing zones can be made by spunbonding. Spunbondednonwovens are made from melt-spun fibers formed by extruding moltenthermoplastic material. Preferred is bioriented polypropylene (BOPP), orbrushed/closed loop in the case of mechanical closing systems.

Further, suitable mechanical closing systems including elastic unitsserving as a flexible waist band for fluid-absorbents articles, such aspants or pull-ups. The elastic units enabling the fluid-absorbentarticle to be pulled down by the wearer as e.g. a training pant.

Suitable pants-shaped fluid-absorbent article has front section, rearsection, crotch section, side sections for connecting the front and rearsections in lateral direction, hip section, elastic waist region andliquid-tight outer layer. The hip section is arranged around the waistof the user. The disposable pants-shaped fluid-absorbent article(pull-up) has favorable flexibility, stretchability, leak-proof propertyand fit property, hence imparts excellent comfort to the wearer.

Suitable pull-ups comprising thermoplastic films, sheets and laminateshaving a low modulus, good tear strength and high elastic recovery.

Suitable closing systems may further comprise elastomerics for theproduction of elastic areas within the fastening devices of thefluid-absorbent article. Elastomerics provide a conformable fit of thefluid-absorbent article to the wearer at the waist and leg openings,while maintaining adequate performance against leakage.

Suitable elastomerics are elastomeric polymers or elastic adhesivematerials showing vapor permeability and liquid barrier properties.Preferred elastomerics are retractable after elongation to a lengthequivalent to its original length.

Suitable closing systems further comprise a belt system, comprisingwaist-belt and leg-belts for flexibly securing the fluid-absorbentarticle on the body of the wearer and to provide an improved fit on thewearer. Suitable waist-belts comprising two elastic belts, a leftelastic belt, and a right elastic belt. The left elastic belt isassociated with each of the left angular edges. The right elastic beltassociated with each of the right angular edges. The left and right sidebelts are elastically extended when the absorbent garment is laid flat.Each belt is connected to and extends between the front and rear of thefluid-absorbent article to form a waist hole and leg holes.

Preferably the belt system is made of elastomerics, thus providing aconformable fit of the fluid-absorbent article and maintaining adequateperformance against leakage.

D. Fluid-absorbent Article Construction

The present invention further relates to the joining of the componentsand layers, films, sheets, tissues or substrates mentioned above toprovide the fluid-absorbent article. At least two, preferably alllayers, films, sheets, tissues or substrates are joined.

Suitable fluid-absorbent articles include a single- or multiplefluid-absorbent core-system. Preferably fluid-absorbent articles includea single- or double fluid-absorbent core-system.

Suitable fluid-storage layers of the fluid-absorbent core comprisinghomogenous or inhomogeneous mixtures of fibrous materials comprisingwater-absorbent polymer particles homogeneously or inhomogeneouslydispersed in it. Suitable fluid-storage layers of the fluid-absorbentcore including a layered fluid-absorbent core-system comprisinghomogenous mixtures of fibrous materials and optionally comprisingwater-absorbent polymer particles, whereby each of the layers may beprepared from any fibrous material by means known in the art.

In order to immobilize the water-absorbent polymer particles, theadjacent layers are fixed by the means of thermoplastic materials,thereby building connections throughout the whole surface oralternatively in discrete areas of junction. For the latter case,cavities or pockets are built carrying the fluid-absorbent particles.The areas of junction may have a regular or irregular pattern, e.g.aligned with the longitudinal axis of the fluid-absorbent core or in apattern of polygons, e.g. pentagons or hexagons. The areas of junctionitself may be of rectangular, circular or squared shape with diametersbetween about 0.5 mm and 2 mm. Fluid-absorbent articles comprising areasof junction show a better wet strength.

The construction of the products chassis and the components containedtherein is made and controlled by the discrete application of hotmeltadhesives as known to people skilled in the art. Examples would be e.g.Dispomelt 505B, Dispomelt Cool 1101, as well as other specific functionadhesives manufactured by National Starch or Henkel.

In order to describe the present invention in detail, embodiments aregenerated which are described hereinafter.

Thus, preferred fluid-absorbent articles are subsequently described indetail.

Embodiment 1

One preferred embodiment of the present invention is described inEmbodiment 1 hereinafter. Thus, a preferred fluid-absorbent articlecomprising

an upper liquid-pervious layer comprising a spunbond layer (three piececoverstock);

a lower liquid-impervious layer comprising a composite of breathablepolyethylene film and spunbond nonwoven;

a single fluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprising between 10to 50% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles based on the totalabsorbent core weight and including a multi-layered fluid-storagesection comprising the following sequence:

a homogenous upper core fluff layer of hydrophilic fibrous matrix ofwood pulp fibers (cellulose fibers) containing about 50% of the totalfluff amount;

a fluid-absorbent layer comprising water-absorbent polymer particles;suitable water-absorbent polymer particles for such construction havinga centrifuge retention capacity (CRC) of at least 30 g/g;

a homogenous lower core fluff layer of hydrophilic fibrous matrix ofwood pulp fibers (cellulose fibers) containing about 50% of the totalfluff amount and acting as a dusting layer; and

an air-through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 30 to 80 gsm; the acquisition-distributionlayer is rectangular shaped and smaller than the fluid-absorbent corehaving a size of about 150 to about 250 cm².

The construction of the products chassis and the components containedtherein is made and controlled by the discrete application of hotmeltadhesives as known to people skilled in the art. Examples would be e.g.Dispomelt 505B, Dispomelt Cool 1101, as well as other specific functionadhesives manufactured by National Starch or Henkel.

Ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers can be formed byimmobilization of water-absorbent polymer particles on a non-woven sheetusing hotmelt adhesives. Preferably the water-absorbent polymerparticles form longitudinal strips or discrete spots. Other patterns ofthe water-absorbent polymer particles are also possible.

In a preferred embodiment the ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbentlayers comprise at least two sheets comprising immobilizedwater-absorbent polymer particles.

Examples of ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers are describedin EP 1 293 187 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,972,011, EP 1 447 066 A1, EP 1 447067 A1, EP 1 609 448 A1, JP 2004/313580, US 2005/0137085, US2006/0004336, US 2007/0135785 WO 2008/155699 A1, WO 2008/155701 A2, WO2008/155702 A1, WO 2008/155710 A1, WO 2008/155711 A1, WO 2004/071363 A1,US 2003/0181115, WO 2005/097025, US 2007/156108, US 2008/0125735, and WO2008/155722 A2, which explicitly forms part of the present disclosure.

Construction Example of Embodiment 1

The fluid-absorbent core consists of a multi-layered single core systemeach layer having a uniform rectangular size. The layeredfluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprises a multi-layeredsystem of hydrophilic fibers (cellulose fibers, fluff pulp fibers). Thetotal fluff pulp weight is 20.45 g divided equally between upper core(1) and lower core (3). The density of the fluid-absorbent core is forthe front overall average 0.18 g/cm³, for the insult zone 0.17 g/cm³,for the back overall average 0.15 g/cm³. The basis weight of thefluid-absorbent core is for the front overall average 802.75 gsm, forthe insult zone 825.94 gsm, for the back overall average 766.14 gsm.

Fluid-absorbent layer (2) holds 31.38% by weight distributedwater-absorbent polymer particles, the quantity of water-absorbentpolymer particles within the fluid-absorbent core is 9.34 g.

The water-absorbent polymer particles derived from dropletizationpolymerization as described example 1, exhibiting the following featuresand absorption profile:

CRC of 33.0 g/g

SFC of 12×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 24.6 g/g

Moisture content of 6.0 wt. %

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent core: length: 37.5 cm; width: 10.0 cm.

An air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 50 gsm is rectangular shaped with dimensions of20 cm×10 cm and smaller than the fluid-absorbent core.

The fluid-absorbent article further comprises:

flat rubber elastics; elastics from spandex type fibers: 3 leg elasticsand 1 cuff elastics leg cuffs from synthetic fibers showing the layercombination SMS and having a basis weight of between 13 to 17 gsm and aheight of 4.6 cm

mechanical closure system with landing zone of dimension 18.3 cm×4.0 cmand flexiband closure tapes of 3.4 cm×1.0 cm; attached to hook fasteningtape of 3.4 cm×1.4 cm

Also incorporated is elasticated waistband located to the rear of theproduct with dimensions of 14.6 cm×4.5 cm

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent article: length: 49.6 cm; front width:34.0 cm; crotch width: 24.0 cm; rear width: 34.3 cm.

Embodiment 2

A further preferred embodiment of the present invention is described inEmbodiment 2 hereinafter. Thus, a preferred fluid-absorbent articlecomprising

an upper liquid-pervious layer comprising a thermalbond layer (threepiece coverstock);

a lower liquid-impervious layer comprising a composite of breathablepolyethylene film and spunbond nonwoven;

a single fluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprising between 40to 80% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles based on the totalabsorbent core weight and including a multi-layered fluid-storagesection comprising the following sequence:

a homogenous upper core fluff layer of hydrophilic fibrous matrix ofwood pulp fibers (cellulose fibers) containing about 50% of the totalfluff amount;

a fluid-absorbent layer comprising water-absorbent polymer particles;suitable water-absorbent polymer particles for such construction havinga saline flow conductivity (SFC) of at least 20×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g;

a homogenous lower core fluff layer of hydrophilic fibrous matrix ofwood pulp fibers (cellulose fibers) containing about 50% of the totalfluff amount and acting as a dusting layer; and

an air-through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 40 to 80 gsm; the acquisition-distributionlayer is rectangular shaped and smaller than the fluid-absorbent corehaving a size of about 150 to about 250 cm².

The construction of the products chassis and the components containedtherein is made and controlled by the discrete application of hotmeltadhesives as known to people skilled in the art. Examples would be e.g.Dispomelt 505B, Dispomelt Cool 1101, as well as other specific functionadhesives manufactured by National Starch or Henkel.

Ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers can be formed byimmobilization of water-absorbent polymer particles on a non-woven sheetusing hotmelt adhesives. Preferably the water-absorbent polymerparticles form longitudinal strips or discrete spots. Other patterns ofthe water-absorbent polymer particles are also possible.

In a preferred embodiment the ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbentlayers comprise at least two sheets comprising immobilizedwater-absorbent polymer particles.

Examples of ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers are describedin EP 1 293 187 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,972,011, EP 1 447 066 A1, EP 1 447067 A1, EP 1 609 448 A1, JP 2004/313580, US 2005/0137085, US2006/0004336, US 2007/0135785 WO 2008/155699 A1, WO 2008/155701 A2, WO2008/155702 A1, WO 2008/155710 A1, WO 2008/155711 A1, WO 2004/071363 A1,US 2003/0181115, WO 2005/097025, US 2007/156108, US 2008/0125735, and WO2008/155722 A2, which explicitly forms part of the present disclosure.

Construction Example of Embodiment 2

The fluid-absorbent core consists of a multi-layered single core systemeach layer having a uniform rectangular size. The layeredfluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprises a multi-layeredsystem of hydrophilic fibers (cellulose fibers, fluff pulp fibers). Thetotal fluff pulp weight is 12 g divided equally between upper core (1)and lower core (3). The density of the fluid-absorbent core is for thefront overall average 0.19 g/cm³, for the insult zone 0.20 g/cm³, forthe back overall average 0.18 g/cm³. The basis weight of thefluid-absorbent core is for the front overall average 989 gsm, for theinsult zone 1101 gsm, for the back overall average 664 gsm. Thethickness of the fluid-absorbent core has an average of 4.5 mm.

The fluid-absorbent layer (2) holds 56.5% by weight distributedwater-absorbent polymer particles, the quantity of water-absorbentpolymer particles within the fluid-absorbent core is 12 g.

The water-absorbent polymer particles derived from dropletizationpolymerization as described in example 13a, exhibiting the followingfeatures and absorption profile:

CRC of 29.2 g/g

SFC of 40×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 19.6 g/g

Moisture content of 12.6 wt. %

Vortex time of 56 s

GBP of 34 Darcies

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent core: length: 38 cm; width: 10 cm.

An air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 50 gsm is rectangular shaped with dimensions of24 cm×8 cm and smaller than the fluid-absorbent core.

The fluid-absorbent article further comprises:

flat rubber elastics; elastics from spandex type fibers: 3 leg elasticsand 1 cuff elastics leg cuffs from synthetic fibers showing the layercombination SMS and having a basis weight of between 13 to 17 gsm and aheight of 4.6 cm

mechanical closure system with landing zone of dimension 18.3 cm×4.0 cmand flexiband closure tapes of 3.4 cm×1.0 cm; attached to hook fasteningtape of 3.4 cm×1.4 cm

Also incorporated is elasticated waistband located to the rear of theproduct with dimensions of 14.6×4.5 cm

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent article: length: 49.6 cm; front width:34.0 cm; crotch width: 24.0 cm; rear width: 34.3 cm.

Embodiment 3

A further preferred embodiment of the present invention is described inEmbodiment 3 hereinafter. Thus, a preferred fluid-absorbent articlecomprising

an upper liquid-pervious layer comprising a spunbond web (three piececoverstock);

a lower liquid-impervious layer comprising a composite of breathablepolyethylene film and spunbond nonwoven;

a single fluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprising a mixtureof wood pulp fibers (cellulose fibers) and between 10 to 50% by weighthomogeneously distributed water-absorbent polymer particles within thefluid-absorbent core (C); suitable water-absorbent polymer particles forsuch construction having a centrifuge retention capacity (CRC) of atleast 30 g/g; the fluid-absorbent core is further comprising a dustinglayer adjacent to the liquid-impervious layer (B) and underlying thefluid-absorbent core above; the dusting layer is a fibrous layercomprising fluff only (cellulose fibers); andan air-through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 30 to 80 gsm; the acquisition-distributionlayer is rectangular shaped and smaller than the fluid-absorbent corehaving a size of about 150 to about 250 cm².

The construction of the products chassis and the components containedtherein is made and controlled by the discrete application of hotmeltadhesives as known to people skilled in the art. Examples would be e.g.Dispomelt 505B, Dispomelt Cool 1101, as well as other specific functionadhesives manufactured by National Starch or Henkel.

Ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers can be formed byimmobilization of water-absorbent polymer particles on a non-woven sheetusing hotmelt adhesives. Preferably the water-absorbent polymerparticles form longitudinal strips or discrete spots. Other patterns ofthe water-absorbent polymer particles are also possible.

In a preferred embodiment the ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbentlayers comprise at least two sheets comprising immobilizedwater-absorbent polymer particles.

Examples of ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers are describedin EP 1 293 187 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,972,011, EP 1 447 066 A1, EP 1 447067 A1, EP 1 609 448 A1, JP 2004/313580, US 2005/0137085, US2006/0004336, US 2007/0135785 WO 2008/155699 A1, WO 2008/155701 A2, WO2008/155702 A1, WO 2008/155710 A1, WO 2008/155711 A1, WO 2004/071363 A1,US 2003/0181115, WO 2005/097025, US 2007/156108, US 2008/0125735, and WO2008/155722 A2, which explicitly forms part of the present disclosure.

Construction Example of Embodiment 3

The fluid-absorbent core consists of a single fluid-absorbent Corebetween (A) and (B) comprising a mixture of wood pulp fibers (cellulosefibers) and 37.11% by weight homogeneously distributed water-absorbentpolymer particles within the fluid-absorbent core (C) having a uniformrectangular size. The quantity of water-absorbent polymer particleswithin the fluid-absorbent core is 11.38 g. The total fluff pulp weightis 19.25 g. The density of the fluid-absorbent core is for the frontoverall average 0.22 g/cm³, for the insult zone 0.18 g/cm³, for the backoverall average 0.18 g/cm³. The basis weight of the fluid-absorbent coreis for the front overall average 914.18 gsm, for the insult zone 925.47gsm, for the back overall average 886.32 gsm.

The water-absorbent polymer particles derived from dropletizationpolymerization as described in example 7, exhibiting the followingfeatures and absorption profile:

CRC of 32.0 g/g

SFC of 20×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 24.0 g/g

Extractables of 1.7 wt. %

Residual monomers of 866 ppm

Moisture content of 5.8 wt. %

FSR of 0.31 gigs

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent core: length: 39.2 cm; width: 10.0 cm.

The thickness of the fluid-absorbent core has an average of 4.7 mm.

An air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 40 gsm is rectangular shaped with dimensions of24.4 cm×8.6 cm and smaller than the fluid-absorbent core.

The fluid-absorbent article further comprises:

flat rubber elastics; elastics from spandex type fibers: 3 leg elasticsand 1 cuff elastics leg cuffs from synthetic fibers showing the layercombination SMS and having a basis weight of between 13 to 17 gsm and aheight of 3.0 cm

mechanical closure system with landing zone of dimension 18.9 cm×3.8 cmand flexiband closure tapes of 1.6 cm×3.4 cm; attached to hook fasteningtape of 1.3 cm×3.4 cm also incorporated is elasticated waistband locatedto the rear of the product with dimensions of 10.8 cm×2.8 cm

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent article: length: 47.8 cm; front width:31.5 cm; crotch width: 20.6 cm; rear width: 31.1 cm.

Embodiment 4

A further preferred embodiment of the present invention is described inEmbodiment 4 hereinafter. Thus, a preferred fluid-absorbent articlecomprising

an upper liquid-pervious layer comprising a spunbond web (three piececoverstock);

a lower liquid-impervious layer comprising a composite of breathablepolyethylene film and spunbond nonwoven;

a single fluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprising a mixtureof wood pulp fibers (cellulose fibers) and between 40 to 80% by weighthomogeneously distributed water-absorbent polymer particles within thefluid-absorbent core; suitable water-absorbent polymer particles forsuch construction having a saline flow conductivity (SFC) of at least20×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g; anda system of two acquisition-distribution layers between (A) and (C),comprising an upper resinbonded layer having a basis weight of 40 to 80gsm; the upper acquisition-distribution layer is rectangular shapedhaving a size of about 150 to about 250 cm²; the loweracquisition-distribution layer comprising of modified cellulosic fibers(e.g. from Buckeye Technologies Inc.) having a basis weight of 40 to 80gsm and a size of about 100 to about 300 cm²; bothacquisition-distribution layers are smaller than the fluid-absorbentcore.

The construction of the products chassis and the components containedtherein is made and controlled by the discrete application of hotmeltadhesives as known to people skilled in the art. Examples would be e.g.Dispomelt 505B, Dispomelt Cool 1101, as well as other specific functionadhesives manufactured by National Starch or Henkel.

Ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers can be formed byimmobilization of water-absorbent polymer particles on a non-woven sheetusing hotmelt adhesives. Preferably the water-absorbent polymerparticles form longitudinal strips or discrete spots. Other patterns ofthe water-absorbent polymer particles are also possible.

In a preferred embodiment the ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbentlayers comprise at least two sheets comprising immobilizedwater-absorbent polymer particles.

Examples of ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers are describedin EP 1 293 187 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,972,011, EP 1 447 066 A1, EP 1 447067 A1, EP 1 609 448 A1, JP 2004/313580, US 2005/0137085, US2006/0004336, US 2007/0135785 WO 2008/155699 A1, WO 2008/155701 A2, WO2008/155702 A1, WO 2008/155710 A1, WO 2008/155711 A1, WO 2004/071363 A1,US 2003/0181115, WO 2005/097025, US 2007/156108, US 2008/0125735, and WO2008/155722 A2, which explicitly forms part of the present disclosure.

Construction Example of Embodiment 4

The fluid-absorbent core consists of a single fluid-absorbent corebetween (A) and (B) comprising a mixture of wood pulp fibers (cellulosefibers) and 67.12% by weight homogeneously distributed water-absorbentpolymer particles within the fluid-absorbent core (C) having a uniformrectangular size. The fluid-absorbent core is encapsulated by wrappingwith a spunbond material having a basis weight of 10 gsm. The quantityof water-absorbent polymer particles within the fluid-absorbent core is12.18 g. The total fluff pulp weight is 5.95 g. The density of thefluid-absorbent core is for the front overall average 0.19 g/cm³, forthe insult zone 0.18 g/cm³, for the back overall average 0.18 g/cm³. Thebasis weight of the fluid-absorbent core is for the front overallaverage 965.79 gsm, for the insult zone 913.38 gsm, for the back overallaverage 658.85 gsm.

The water-absorbent polymer particles derived from dropletizationpolymerization as described in example 14e, exhibiting the followingfeatures and absorption profile:

CRC of 31.5 g/g

SFC of 49×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 24.0 g/g

Moisture content of 6.2 wt. %

Vortex time of 65 s

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent core: length: 40.0 cm; width: 10.0 cm.

The thickness of the fluid-absorbent core has an average of 4.4 mm.

An air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 60 gsm is rectangular shaped with dimensions of24.0 cm×7.5 cm and smaller than the fluid-absorbent core.

The fluid-absorbent article further comprises:

flat rubber elastics; elastics from spandex type fibers: 3 leg elasticsand 2 cuff elastics leg cuffs from synthetic fibers showing the layercombination SMS and having a basis weight of between 13 to 17 gsm and aheight of 3.3 cm

mechanical closure system with landing zone of dimension 19.8 cm×5.0 cmand flexiband closure tapes of 3.5 cm×2.7 cm consisting of pressuresensitive adhesive zone 3.5 cm×1.5 cm and mechanical hook of 3.5 cm×1.2cm

For improving the fit of the fluid-absorbent article, the product ofembodiment 4 provides a stretchable side panel and a reduced widthchassis.

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent article: length: 48.0 cm; front width:32.3 cm; crotch width: 20.3 cm; rear width: 31.0 cm.

Embodiment 5

A further preferred embodiment of the present invention is described inEmbodiment 5 hereinafter. Thus, a preferred fluid-absorbent articlecomprising

an upper liquid-pervious layer comprising a spunbond layer (three piececoverstock);

a lower liquid-impervious layer comprising a composite of breathablepolyethylene film and spunbond nonwoven;

a double fluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprising ahomogenous mixture of wood pulp fibers (cellulose fibers) andwater-absorbent polymer particles as primary core and a layeredsecondary fluid-absorbent core; the total double fluid-absorbent corecomprising the following sequence:a homogenous primary core of hydrophilic fibrous matrix of wood pulpfibers (cellulose fibers) comprising between 10 to 50% by weightwater-absorbent polymer particles based on the primary absorbent coreweight; the primary core contains about 30% of the total fluff amount;suitable water-absorbent polymer particles for such construction havinga centrifuge retention capacity (CRC) of at least 30 g/g;a secondary core upper fluff layer of hydrophilic fibrous matrix of woodpulp fibers (cellulose fibers); the secondary core upper layer containsabout 35% of the total fluff amount;

a fluid-absorbent layer comprising between 10 to 50% by weightwater-absorbent polymer particles based on the secondary absorbent coreweight; suitable water-absorbent polymer particles for such constructionhaving a centrifuge retention capacity (CRC) of at least 30 g/g;

a secondary core lower fluff layer of hydrophilic fibrous matrix of woodpulp fibers (cellulose fibers) acting as a dusting layer; the lower corecontains about 35% of the total fluff amount; and

an air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 30 to 80 gsm; the acquisition-distributionlayer is rectangular shaped and smaller than the primary fluid-absorbentcore having a size of about 150 to about 250 cm².

The construction of the products chassis and the components containedtherein is made and controlled by the discrete application of hotmeltadhesives as known to people skilled in the art. Examples would be e.g.Dispomelt 505B, Dispomelt Cool 1101, as well as other specific functionadhesives manufactured by National Starch or Henkel.

Ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers can be formed byimmobilization of water-absorbent polymer particles on a non-woven sheetusing hotmelt adhesives. Preferably the water-absorbent polymerparticles form longitudinal strips or discrete spots. Other patterns ofthe water-absorbent polymer particles are also possible.

In a preferred embodiment the ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbentlayers comprise at least two sheets comprising immobilizedwater-absorbent polymer particles.

Examples of ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers are describedin EP 1 293 187 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,972,011, EP 1 447 066 A1, EP 1 447067 A1, EP 1 609 448 A1, JP 2004/313580, US 2005/0137085, US2006/0004336, US 2007/0135785 WO 2008/155699 A1, WO 2008/155701 A2, WO2008/155702 A1, WO 2008/155710 A1, WO 2008/155711 A1, WO 2004/071363 A1,US 2003/0181115, WO 2005/097025, US 2007/156108, US 2008/0125735, and WO2008/155722 A2, which explicitly forms part of the present disclosure.

Construction Example of Embodiment 5

The total fluid-absorbent core includes a double-core system, theprimary and secondary cores each having an almost uniform rectangularsize. The primary core is smaller than the secondary core and ispositioned 6 cm from the front distal edge of the secondary core and 10cm from the rear distal edge of the secondary core and is 9 cm in width.The primary fluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprising ahomogenous mixture of hydrophilic fibrous matrix of wood pulp fibers and25% by weight of water absorbent polymer particles. The primary core hasa total weight of 8 g. The secondary core is a multi-layered system ofhydrophilic fibrous matrix of wood pulp fibers (cellulose fibers) and30% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles. The quantity ofwater-absorbent polymer particles within the secondary fluid-absorbentcore is 6.0 g. The density of the fluid-absorbent core is for the frontoverall average 0.15 g/cm³, for the insult zone 0.19 g/cm³, for the backoverall average 0.18 g/cm³. The basis weight of the fluid-absorbent coreis for the front overall average 790.63 gsm, for the insult zone 1121.38gsm, for the back overall average 976.83 gsm.

The water-absorbent polymer particles derived from dropletizationpolymerization as described in example 10, exhibiting the followingfeatures and absorption profile:

CRC of 35.5 g/g

SFC of 16×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 26.2 g/g

Moisture content of 1.8 wt. %

Dimension of the secondary fluid-absorbent core: length: 40.8 cm; frontwidth: 10.5 cm; crotch width: 9.3 cm; rear width: 10.3 cm.

The total thickness of both fluid-absorbent cores has an average of 5.4mm.

An air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 40 gsm is rectangular shaped and smaller thanthe primary fluid-absorbent core having a size of 19.7 cm×7.6 cm.

The fluid-absorbent article further comprises:

flat rubber elastics; elastics from spandex type fibers: 3 leg elasticsand 2 cuff elastics leg cuffs from synthetic fibers showing the layercombination SMS and having a basis weight of between 13 to 17 gsm and aheight of 3.8 cm

mechanical closure system with landing zone of dimension 22.0 cm×4.0 cmand flexiband closure tapes of 3.4 cm×1.5 cm; attached to hook fasteningtape of 3.4 cm×1.4 cm

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent article: length: 48.0 cm; front width:29.7 cm; crotch width: 22.0 cm; rear width: 31.6 cm.

Embodiment 6

A further preferred embodiment of the present invention is described inEmbodiment 6 hereinafter. Thus, a preferred fluid-absorbent articlecomprising

an upper liquid-pervious layer comprising a spunbond layer (three piececoverstock);

a lower liquid-impervious layer comprising a composite of breathablepolyethylene film and spunbond nonwoven;

a double fluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprising ahomogenous mixture of wood pulp fibers (cellulose fibers) andwater-absorbent polymer particles as primary core and a layeredsecondary fluid-absorbent core; the total double fluid-absorbent corecomprising the following sequence:a homogenous primary core of hydrophilic fibrous matrix of wood pulpfibers (cellulose fibers) comprising between 40 to 80% by weightwater-absorbent polymer particles based on the primary absorbent coreweight; the primary core contains about 50% of the total fluff amount;suitable water-absorbent polymer particles for such construction havinga saline flow conductivity (SFC) of at least 20×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g;a secondary core upper fluff layer of hydrophilic fibrous matrix of woodpulp fibers (cellulose fibers); the secondary core upper layer containsabout 25% of the total fluff amount;a fluid-absorbent layer comprising between 40 to 80% by weightwater-absorbent polymer particles based on the secondary absorbent coreweight; suitable water-absorbent polymer particles for such constructionhaving a saline flow conductivity (SFC) of at least 20×10⁷ cm³s/g;a secondary core lower fluff layer of hydrophilic fibrous matrix of woodpulp fibers (cellulose fibers) acting as a dusting layer; the lower corecontains about 25% of the total fluff amount; andan air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 40 to 80 gsm; the acquisition-distributionlayer is rectangular shaped and smaller than the primary fluid-absorbentcore having a size of about 150 to about 250 cm².

The construction of the products chassis and the components containedtherein is made and controlled by the discrete application of hotmeltadhesives as known to people skilled in the art. Examples would be e.g.Dispomelt 505B, Dispomelt Cool 1101, as well as other specific functionadhesives manufactured by National Starch or Henkel.

Ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers can be formed byimmobilization of water-absorbent polymer particles on a non-woven sheetusing hotmelt adhesives. Preferably the water-absorbent polymerparticles form longitudinal strips or discrete spots. Other patterns ofthe water-absorbent polymer particles are also possible.

In a preferred embodiment the ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbentlayers comprise at least two sheets comprising immobilizedwater-absorbent polymer particles.

Examples of ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers are describedin EP 1 293 187 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,972,011, EP 1 447 066 A1, EP 1 447067 A1, EP 1 609 448 A1, JP 2004/313580, US 2005/0137085, US2006/0004336, US 2007/0135785 WO 2008/155699 A1, WO 2008/155701 A2, WO2008/155702 A1, WO 2008/155710 A1, WO 2008/155711 A1, WO 2004/071363 A1,US 2003/0181115, WO 2005/097025, US 2007/156108, US 2008/0125735, and WO2008/155722 A2, which explicitly forms part of the present disclosure.

Construction Example of Embodiment 6

The total fluid-absorbent core includes a double-core system, theprimary and secondary cores each having an almost uniform rectangularsize. The primary core is smaller than the secondary core and ispositioned 6 cm from the front distal edge of the secondary core and 10cm from the rear distal edge of the secondary core and is 9 cm in width.The primary fluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprising ahomogenous mixture of hydrophilic fibrous matrix of wood pulp fibers and50% by weight of water absorbent polymer particles. The primary core hasa total weight of 8 g. The secondary core is a multi-layered system ofhydrophilic fibrous matrix of wood pulp fibers (cellulose fibers) and50% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles. The quantity ofwater-absorbent polymer particles within the secondary fluid-absorbentcore is 10.0 g. The density of the fluid-absorbent core is for the frontoverall average 0.19 g/cm³, for the insult zone 0.19 g/cm³, for the backoverall average 0.18 g/cm³. The basis weight of the fluid-absorbent coreis for the front overall average 813.46 gsm, for the insult zone 1209.15gsm, for the back overall average 986.27 gsm.

The water-absorbent polymer particles derived from dropletizationpolymerization as described in example 18b, exhibiting the followingfeatures and absorption profile:

CRC of 33.6 g/g

SFC of 45×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 18.7 g/g

Moisture content of 5.5 wt. %

Vortex time of 57 s

GBP of 33 Darcies

Dimension of the secondary fluid-absorbent core: length: 40.8 cm; frontwidth: 10.0 cm; crotch width: 9.0 cm; rear width: 10.0 cm.

The total thickness of both fluid-absorbent cores has an average of 3.9mm.

An air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 60 gsm is rectangular shaped and smaller thanthe primary fluid-absorbent core having a size of 19.0 cm×7.6 cm.

The fluid-absorbent article further comprises:

flat rubber elastics; elastics from spandex type fibers: 3 leg elasticsand 2 cuff elastics leg cuffs from synthetic fibers showing the layercombination SMS and having a basis weight of between 13 to 17 gsm and aheight of 3.8 cm

mechanical closure system with landing zone of dimension 22.0 cm×4.0 cmand flexiband closure tapes of 3.4 cm×1.5 cm; attached to hook fasteningtape of 3.4 cm×1.4 cm

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent article: length: 48.0 cm; front width:29.7 cm; crotch width: 20.0 cm; rear width: 31.6 cm.

Embodiment 7

A further preferred embodiment of the present invention is described inEmbodiment 7 hereinafter. Thus, a preferred fluid-absorbent articlecomprising

an upper liquid-pervious layer comprising a spunbond layer (three piececoverstock);

a lower liquid-impervious layer comprising a composite of breathablepolyethylene film and spunbond nonwoven;

a double fluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprising ahomogenous mixture of wood pulp fibers (cellulose fibers) and polymerparticles for each the primary core and the secondary fluid-absorbentcore; the total double fluid-absorbent core comprising:a homogenous primary core of hydrophilic fibrous matrix of wood pulpfibers (cellulose fibers) comprising between 10 to 50% by weightwater-absorbent polymer particles based on the primary absorbent coreweight; the primary core contains about 30% of the total fluff amount;suitable water-absorbent polymer particles for such construction havinga centrifuge retention capacity (CRC) of at least 30 g/g;a homogenous secondary core of hydrophilic fibrous matrix of wood pulpfibers (cellulose fibers) comprising between 10 to 50% by weightwater-absorbent polymer particles based on the secondary absorbent coreweight; the secondary core contains about 70% of the total fluff amount;suitable water-absorbent polymer particles for such construction havinga centrifuge retention capacity (CRC) of at least 30 g/g; andan air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 30 to 80 gsm; the acquisition-distributionlayer is rectangular shaped and smaller than the primary fluid-absorbentcore having a size of about 150 to about 250 cm².

The construction of the products chassis and the components containedtherein is made and controlled by the discrete application of hotmeltadhesives as known to people skilled in the art. Examples would be e.g.Dispomelt 505B, Dispomelt Cool 1101, as well as other specific functionadhesives manufactured by National Starch or Henkel.

Ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers can be formed byimmobilization of water-absorbent polymer particles on a non-woven sheetusing hotmelt adhesives. Preferably the water-absorbent polymerparticles form longitudinal strips or discrete spots. Other patterns ofthe water-absorbent polymer particles are also possible.

In a preferred embodiment the ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbentlayers comprise at least two sheets comprising immobilizedwater-absorbent polymer particles.

Examples of ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers are describedin EP 1 293 187 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,972,011, EP 1 447 066 A1, EP 1 447067 A1, EP 1 609 448 A1, JP 2004/313580, US 2005/0137085, US2006/0004336, US 2007/0135785 WO 2008/155699 A1, WO 2008/155701 A2, WO2008/155702 A1, WO 2008/155710 A1, WO 2008/155711 A1, WO 2004/071363 A1,US 2003/0181115, WO 2005/097025, US 2007/156108, US 2008/0125735, and WO2008/155722 A2, which explicitly forms part of the present disclosure.

Construction Example of Embodiment 7

The total fluid-absorbent core includes a double-core system, theprimary and secondary cores each having an almost uniform rectangularsize. The primary core is smaller than the secondary core and ispositioned 6 cm from the front distal edge of the secondary core and 10cm from the rear distal edge of the secondary core and is 9 cm in width.The primary fluid-absorbent core between (A) and the secondaryfluid-absorbent core comprising a homogenous mixture of hydrophilicfibrous matrix of wood pulp fibers and 25% by weight of water absorbentpolymer particles. The primary core has a total weight of 8 g. Thesecondary core between the primary core and (B) comprising a homogenousmixture of hydrophilic fibrous matrix of wood pulp fibers and 30% byweight of water absorbent polymer particles. The quantity ofwater-absorbent polymer particles within the secondary fluid-absorbentcore is 6.0 g. The secondary core has a total weight of 20 g. Thedensity of the fluid-absorbent core is for the front overall average0.15 g/cm³, for the insult zone 0.19 g/cm³, for the back overall average0.18 g/cm³. The basis weight of the fluid-absorbent core is for thefront overall average 790.63 gsm, for the insult zone 1121.38 gsm, forthe back overall average 976.83 gsm.

The water-absorbent polymer particles derived from dropletizationpolymerization as described in example 13c, exhibiting the followingfeatures and absorption profile:

CRC of 31.5 g/g

SFC of 35×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 22.9 g/g

Moisture content of 7.9 wt. %

Vortex time of 63 s

GBP of 34 Darcies

Dimension of the secondary fluid-absorbent core: length: 40.8 cm; frontwidth: 10.5 cm; crotch width: 9.3 cm; rear width: 10.3 cm

The total thickness of both fluid-absorbent cores has an average of 5.4mm.

An air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 40 gsm is rectangular shaped and smaller thanthe primary fluid-absorbent core having a size of 19.7 cm×7.6 cm.

The fluid-absorbent article further comprises:

flat rubber elastics; elastics from spandex type fibers: 3 leg elasticsand 2 cuff elastics leg cuffs from synthetic fibers showing the layercombination SMS and having a basis weight of between 13 to 17 gsm and aheight of 3.8 cm

mechanical closure system with landing zone of dimension 22.0 cm×4.0 cmand flexiband closure tapes of 3.4 cm×1.5 cm; attached to hook fasteningtape of 3.4 cm×1.4 cm

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent article: length: 48.0 cm; front width:29.7 cm; crotch width: 22.0 cm; rear width: 31.6 cm.

Embodiment 8

A further preferred embodiment of the present invention is described inEmbodiment 8 hereinafter. Thus, a preferred fluid-absorbent articlecomprising

an upper liquid-pervious layer comprising a spunbond layer (three piececoverstock);

a lower liquid-impervious layer comprising a composite of breathablepolyethylene film and spunbond nonwoven;

a double fluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprising ahomogenous mixture of wood pulp fibers (cellulose fibers) and polymerparticles for each the primary core and the secondary fluid-absorbentcore; the total double fluid-absorbent core comprising:a homogenous primary core of hydrophilic fibrous matrix of wood pulpfibers (cellulose fibers) comprising between 40 to 80% by weightwater-absorbent polymer particles based on the primary absorbent coreweight; the primary core contains about 50% of the total fluff amount;suitable water-absorbent polymer particles for such construction havinga saline flow conductivity (SFC) of at least 20×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g;a homogenous secondary core of hydrophilic fibrous matrix of wood pulpfibers (cellulose fibers) comprising between 40 to 70% by weightwater-absorbent polymer particles based on the secondary absorbent coreweight; the secondary core contains about 50% of the total fluff amount;suitable water-absorbent polymer particles for such construction havinga saline flow conductivity (SFC) of at least 20×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g; andan air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 40 to 80 gsm; the acquisition-distributionlayer is rectangular shaped and smaller than the primary fluid-absorbentcore having a size of about 150 to about 250 cm².

The construction of the products chassis and the components containedtherein is made and controlled by the discrete application of hotmeltadhesives as known to people skilled in the art. Examples would be e.g.Dispomelt 505B, Dispomelt Cool 1101, as well as other specific functionadhesives manufactured by National Starch or Henkel.

Ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers can be formed byimmobilization of water-absorbent polymer particles on a non-woven sheetusing hotmelt adhesives. Preferably the water-absorbent polymerparticles form longitudinal strips or discrete spots. Other patterns ofthe water-absorbent polymer particles are also possible.

In a preferred embodiment the ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbentlayers comprise at least two sheets comprising immobilizedwater-absorbent polymer particles.

Examples of ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers are describedin EP 1 293 187 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,972,011, EP 1 447 066 A1, EP 1 447067 A1, EP 1 609 448 A1, JP 2004/313580, US 2005/0137085, US2006/0004336, US 2007/0135785 WO 2008/155699 A1, WO 2008/155701 A2, WO2008/155702 A1, WO 2008/155710 A1, WO 2008/155711 A1, WO 2004/071363 A1,US 2003/0181115, WO 2005/097025, US 2007/156108, US 2008/0125735, and WO2008/155722 A2, which explicitly forms part of the present disclosure.

Construction Example of Embodiment 8

The total fluid-absorbent core includes a double-core system, theprimary and secondary cores each having an almost uniform rectangularsize. The primary core is smaller than the secondary core and ispositioned 6 cm from the front distal edge of the secondary core and 10cm from the rear distal edge of the secondary core and is 9 cm in width.The primary fluid-absorbent core between (A) and the secondaryfluid-absorbent core comprising a homogenous mixture of hydrophilicfibrous matrix of wood pulp fibers and 28.6% by weight of waterabsorbent polymer particles. The primary core has a total weight of 8 g.The secondary core between the primary core and (B) comprising ahomogenous mixture of hydrophilic fibrous matrix of wood pulp fibers and71.4% by weight of water absorbent polymer particles. The quantity ofwater-absorbent polymer particles within the secondary fluid-absorbentcore is 10.0 g. The secondary core has a total weight of 20 g. Thedensity of the fluid-absorbent core is for the front overall average0.15 g/cm³, for the insult zone 0.19 g/cm³, for the back overall average0.18 g/cm³. The basis weight of the fluid-absorbent core is for thefront overall average 790.63 gsm, for the insult zone 1121.38 gsm, forthe back overall average 976.83 gsm.

The water-absorbent polymer particles derived from dropletizationpolymerization as described in example 19c, exhibiting the followingfeatures and absorption profile:

CRC of 31.5 g/g

SFC of 70×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 20.4 g/g

Moisture content of 7.6 wt. %

Vortex time of 59 s

GBP of 42 Darcies

Dimension of the secondary fluid-absorbent core: length: 40.8 cm; frontwidth: 10.5 cm; crotch width: 9.3 cm; rear width: 10.3 cm.

The total thickness of both fluid-absorbent cores has an average of 5.4mm.

An air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 60 gsm is rectangular shaped and smaller thanthe primary fluid-absorbent core having a size of 19.7 cm×7.6 cm.

The fluid-absorbent article further comprises:

flat rubber elastics; elastics from spandex type fibers: 3 leg elasticsand 2 cuff elastics leg cuffs from synthetic fibers showing the layercombination SMS and having a basis weight of between 13 to 17 gsm and aheight of 3.8 cm

mechanical closure system with landing zone of dimension 22.0 cm×4.0 cmand flexiband closure tapes of 3.4 cm×1.5 cm; attached to hook fasteningtape of 3.4 cm×1.4 cm

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent article: length: 48.0 cm; front width:29.7 cm; crotch width: 20.0 cm; rear width: 31.6 cm.

Embodiment 9

A further preferred embodiment of the present invention is described inEmbodiment 9 (pantiliner) hereinafter. Thus, a preferred fluid-absorbentarticle comprising

an upper liquid-pervious layer comprising a spunbond layer (three piececoverstock);

a lower liquid-impervious layer comprising a composite of breathablepolyethylene film and spunbond nonwoven;

a single fluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprising between 10to 50% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles based on the totalabsorbent core weight and including a multi-layered fluid-storagesection comprising the following sequence:

a homogenous upper core fluff layer of hydrophilic fibrous matrix ofwood pulp fibers (cellulose fibers) containing about 50% of the totalfluff amount;

a fluid-absorbent layer comprising water-absorbent polymer particles;suitable water-absorbent polymer particles for such construction havinga centrifuge retention capacity (CRC) of at least 30 g/g; and

an air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 40 to 80 gsm; the acquisition-distributionlayer is rectangular shaped and smaller than the primary fluid-absorbentcore having a size of about 150 to about 250 cm².

The construction of the products chassis and the components containedtherein is made and controlled by the discrete application of hotmeltadhesives as known to people skilled in the art. Examples would be e.g.Dispomelt 505B, Dispomelt Cool 1101, as well as other specific functionadhesives manufactured by National Starch or Henkel.

Ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers can be formed byimmobilization of water-absorbent polymer particles on a non-woven sheetusing hotmelt adhesives. Preferably the water-absorbent polymerparticles form longitudinal strips or discrete spots. Other patterns ofthe water-absorbent polymer particles are also possible.

In a preferred embodiment the ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbentlayers comprise at least two sheets comprising immobilizedwater-absorbent polymer particles.

Examples of ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers are describedin EP 1 293 187 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,972,011, EP 1 447 066 A1, EP 1 447067 A1, EP 1 609 448 A1, JP 2004/313580, US 2005/0137085, US2006/0004336, US 2007/0135785 WO 2008/155699 A1, WO 2008/155701 A2, WO2008/155702 A1, WO 2008/155710 A1, WO 2008/155711 A1, WO 2004/071363 A1,US 2003/0181115, WO 2005/097025, US 2007/156108, US 2008/0125735, and WO2008/155722 A2, which explicitly forms part of the present disclosure.

Construction Example of Embodiment 9

The fluid-absorbent core consists of a double-layered single core systemeach layer having a uniform rectangular size. The layeredfluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprises a double-layeredsystem of hydrophilic fibers (cellulose fibers, fluff pulp fibers), eachlayer having an almost uniform rectangular size. The fluid-absorbentcore is encapsulated by wrapping with a spunbond material having a basisweight of 10 gsm. The density of the fluid-absorbent core is for thefont overall average 0.16 g/cm³, for the insult zone 0.14 g/cm³, for theback overall average 0.16 g/cm³. The basis weight of the fluid-absorbentcore is for the front overall average 598.16 gsm, for the insult zone596.94 gsm, for the back overall average 626.23 gsm. The thickness ofthe fluid-absorbent core has an average of 3.8 mm.

The fluid-absorbent core holds 31.38% by weight distributedwater-absorbent polymer particles, the quantity of water-absorbentpolymer particles within the fluid-absorbent core is 9.34 g.

The water-absorbent polymer particles derived from dropletizationpolymerization as described in example 18k, exhibiting the followingfeatures and absorption profile:

CRC of 34.0 g/g

SFC of 22×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 20.4 g/g

Moisture content of 5.8 wt. %

Vortex time of 62 s

GBP of 20 Darcies

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent core: length: 40.8 cm; front width:14.2 cm; crotch width: 14.5 cm; rear width: 14.1 cm.

An air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 35.7 gsm is rectangular shaped and smaller thanthe fluid-absorbent core having a size of 24.0 cm×9.2 cm.

The fluid-absorbent article further comprises:

flat rubber elastics; elastics from spandex type fibers: 5 cuff elasticsleg cuffs from synthetic fibers showing the layer combination SMS andhaving a basis weight of between 13 to 17 gsm and a height of 4.7 cm

For improving the fit of the fluid-absorbent article, the pantiliner ofembodiment 10 provides stretchable bands.

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent article: length: 47.9 cm; front width:31.3 cm; crotch width: 15.4 cm; rear width: 31.3 cm.

Embodiment 10

A further preferred embodiment of the present invention is described inEmbodiment 10 (pantiliner) hereinafter. Thus, a preferredfluid-absorbent article comprising

an upper liquid-pervious layer comprising a spunbond layer (three piececoverstock);

a lower liquid-impervious layer comprising a composite of breathablepolyethylene film and spunbond nonwoven;

a single fluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprising between 40to 80% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles based on the totalabsorbent core weight and including a multi-layered fluid-storagesection comprising the following sequence:

a homogenous upper core fluff layer of hydrophilic fibrous matrix ofwood pulp fibers (cellulose fibers) containing about 50% of the totalfluff amount;

a fluid-absorbent layer comprising water-absorbent polymer particles;suitable water-absorbent polymer particles for such construction havinga saline flow conductivity (SFC) of at least 20×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g; and

an air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 40 to 80 gsm; the acquisition-distributionlayer is rectangular shaped and smaller than the primary fluid-absorbentcore having a size of about 150 to about 250 cm².

The construction of the products chassis and the components containedtherein is made and controlled by the discrete application of hotmeltadhesives as known to people skilled in the art. Examples would be e.g.Dispomelt 505B, Dispomelt Cool 1101, as well as other specific functionadhesives manufactured by National Starch or Henkel.

Ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers can be formed byimmobilization of water-absorbent polymer particles on a non-woven sheetusing hotmelt adhesives. Preferably the water-absorbent polymerparticles form longitudinal strips or discrete spots. Other patterns ofthe water-absorbent polymer particles are also possible.

In a preferred embodiment the ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbentlayers comprise at least two sheets comprising immobilizedwater-absorbent polymer particles.

Examples of ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers are describedin EP 1 293 187 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,972,011, EP 1 447 066 A1, EP 1 447067 A1, EP 1 609 448 A1, JP 2004/313580, US 2005/0137085, US2006/0004336, US 2007/0135785 WO 2008/155699 A1, WO 2008/155701 A2, WO2008/155702 A1, WO 2008/155710 A1, WO 2008/155711 A1, WO 2004/071363 A1,US 2003/0181115, WO 2005/097025, US 2007/156108, US 2008/0125735, and WO2008/155722 A2, which explicitly forms part of the present disclosure.

Construction Example of Embodiment 10

The fluid-absorbent core consists of a double-layered single core systemeach layer having a uniform rectangular size. The layeredfluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprises a double-layeredsystem of hydrophilic fibers (cellulose fibers, fluff pulp fibers), eachlayer having an almost uniform rectangular size. The fluid-absorbentcore is encapsulated by wrapping with a spunbond material having a basisweight of 10 gsm. The density of the fluid-absorbent core is for thefont overall average 0.16 g/cm³, for the insult zone 0.14 g/cm³, for theback overall average 0.16 g/cm³. The basis weight of the fluid-absorbentcore is for the front overall average 598.16 gsm, for the insult zone596.94 gsm, for the back overall average 626.23 gsm. The thickness ofthe fluid-absorbent core has an average of 3.8 mm.

The fluid-absorbent core holds 59.05% by weight distributedwater-absorbent polymer particles, the quantity of water-absorbentpolymer particles within the fluid-absorbent core is 11.9 g.

The water-absorbent polymer particles derived from dropletizationpolymerization as described in example 21d, exhibiting the followingfeatures and absorption profile:

CRC of 33.6 g/g

SFC of 46×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 18.3 g/g

Moisture content of 5.5 wt. %

Vortex time of 58 s

GBP of 33 Darcies

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent core: length: 40.8 cm; front width:14.2 cm; crotch width: 14.5 cm; rear width: 14.1 cm.

An air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 35.7 gsm is rectangular shaped and smaller thanthe fluid-absorbent core having a size of 24.0 cm×9.2 cm.

The fluid-absorbent article further comprises:

flat rubber elastics; elastics from spandex type fibers: 5 cuff elastics

leg cuffs from synthetic fibers showing the layer combination SMS andhaving a basis weight of between 13 to 17 gsm and a height of 4.7 cm

For improving the fit of the fluid-absorbent article, the pantiliner ofembodiment 10 provides stretchable bands.

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent article: length: 47.9 cm; front width:31.3 cm; crotch width: 15.4 cm; rear width: 31.3 cm.

Embodiment 11

A further preferred embodiment of the present invention is described inEmbodiment 11 (pantiliner) hereinafter. Thus, a preferredfluid-absorbent article comprising

an upper liquid-pervious layer comprising a spunbond layer (three piececoverstock);

a lower liquid-impervious layer comprising a composite of breathablepolyethylene film and spunbond nonwoven;

a high-loaded single fluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprisingbetween 55 to 95% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles based onthe total absorbent core weight and including a multi-layeredfluid-storage section comprising the following sequence:a homogenous upper core layer of hydrophilic synthetic fibers (fibrousmatrix) containing about 95% of the total fluff amount;a high-loaded fluid-absorbent layer comprising water-absorbent polymerparticles; suitable water-absorbent polymer particles for suchconstruction having a saline flow conductivity (SFC) of at least 80×10⁻⁷cm³s/g; andan air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 40 to 80 gsm; the acquisition-distributionlayer is rectangular shaped and smaller than the primary fluid-absorbentcore having a size of about 150 to about 250 cm².

The construction of the products chassis and the components containedtherein is made and controlled by the discrete application of hotmeltadhesives as known to people skilled in the art. Examples would be e.g.Dispomelt 505B, Dispomelt Cool 1101, as well as other specific functionadhesives manufactured by National Starch or Henkel.

Ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers can be formed byimmobilization of water-absorbent polymer particles on a non-woven sheetusing hotmelt adhesives. Preferably the water-absorbent polymerparticles form longitudinal strips or discrete spots. Other patterns ofthe water-absorbent polymer particles are also possible.

In a preferred embodiment the ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbentlayers comprise at least two sheets comprising immobilizedwater-absorbent polymer particles.

Examples of ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers are describedin EP 1 293 187 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,972,011, EP 1 447 066 A1, EP 1 447067 A1, EP 1 609 448 A1, JP 2004/313580, US 2005/0137085, US2006/0004336, US 2007/0135785 WO 2008/155699 A1, WO 2008/155701 A2, WO2008/155702 A1, WO 2008/155710 A1, WO 2008/155711 A1, WO 2004/071363 A1,US 2003/0181115, WO 2005/097025, US 2007/156108, US 2008/0125735, and WO2008/155722 A2, which explicitly forms part of the present disclosure.

Construction Example of Embodiment 11

The fluid-absorbent core consists of a double-layered high-loaded singlecore system each layer having a uniform rectangular size. The layeredfluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprises a double-layeredsystem of hydrophilic fibers (synthetic fibers), each layer having arectangular size. The fluid-absorbent core is encapsulated by wrappingwith a spunbond material having a basis weight of 10 gsm. The density ofthe fluid-absorbent core is for the font overall average 0.20 g/cm³, forthe insult zone 0.20 g/cm³, for the back overall average 0.21 g/cm³. Thebasis weight of the fluid-absorbent core is for the front overallaverage 551.51 gsm, for the insult zone 585.71 gsm, for the back overallaverage 569.63 gsm. The thickness of the fluid-absorbent core has anaverage of 2.9 mm.

The fluid-absorbent core holds 81.6% by weight distributedwater-absorbent polymer particles, the quantity of water-absorbentpolymer particles within the fluid-absorbent core is 12.9 g.

The water-absorbent polymer particles derived from dropletizationpolymerization as described in example 12, exhibiting the followingfeatures and absorption profile:

CRC of 25.5 g/g

SFC of 60×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 22.3 g/g

Moisture content of 0.2 wt. %

GBP of 120 Darcies

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent core: length: 40.8 cm; front width:14.2 cm; crotch width: 14.5 cm; rear width: 14.1 cm.

An air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 35.7 gsm is rectangular shaped and smaller thanthe fluid-absorbent core having a size of 24.0 cm×9.2 cm.

The fluid-absorbent article further comprises:

flat rubber elastics; elastics from spandex type fibers: 5 cuff elastics

leg cuffs from synthetic fibers showing the layer combination SMS andhaving a basis weight of between 13 to 17 gsm and a height of 4.7 cm

wetness indicator at the lower side of the liquid-impervious layer (B)

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent article: length: 47.9 cm; front width:31.3 cm; crotch width: 15.4 cm; rear width: 31.3 cm

Embodiment 12

A further preferred embodiment of the present invention is described inEmbodiment 12 (pantiliner) hereinafter. Thus, a preferredfluid-absorbent article comprising

an upper liquid-pervious layer comprising a thermobond layer(coverstock);

a lower liquid-impervious layer comprising a composite of breathablepolyethylene film and spunbond nonwoven;

a high-loaded single fluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprisingbetween 55 to 95% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles based onthe total absorbent core weight and including a fluid-storage sectioncomprising a high-loaded mixed fluid-absorbent layer wrapped with ahomogenous layer of hydrophilic synthetic fibers; said high-loadedfluid-absorbent layer comprises water-absorbent polymer particles;suitable water-absorbent polymer particles for such construction havinga saline flow conductivity (SFC) of at least 80×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g; saidhomogenous wrapping of hydrophilic synthetic fibers contains about 95%of the total fluff amount; andan air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 40 to 80 gsm; the acquisition-distributionlayer is rectangular shaped and smaller than the primary fluid-absorbentcore having a size of about 150 to about 250 cm².

The construction of the products chassis and the components containedtherein is made and controlled by the discrete application of hotmeltadhesives as known to people skilled in the art. Examples would be e.g.Dispomelt 505B, Dispomelt Cool 1101, as well as other specific functionadhesives manufactured by National Starch or Henkel.

Ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers can be formed byimmobilization of water-absorbent polymer particles on a non-woven sheetusing hotmelt adhesives. Preferably the water-absorbent polymerparticles form longitudinal strips or discrete spots. Other patterns ofthe water-absorbent polymer particles are also possible.

In a preferred embodiment the ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbentlayers comprise at least two sheets comprising immobilizedwater-absorbent polymer particles.

Examples of ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers are describedin EP 1 293 187 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,972,011, EP 1 447 066 A1, EP 1 447067 A1, EP 1 609 448 A1, JP 2004/313580, US 2005/0137085, US2006/0004336, US 2007/0135785 WO 2008/155699 A1, WO 2008/155701 A2, WO2008/155702 A1, WO 2008/155710 A1, WO 2008/155711 A1, WO 2004/071363 A1,US 2003/0181115, WO 2005/097025, US 2007/156108, US 2008/0125735, and WO2008/155722 A2, which explicitly forms part of the present disclosure.

Construction Example of Embodiment 12

The fluid-absorbent core consists of a high-loaded single core systemhaving a uniform rectangular size. The fluid-absorbent core between (A)and (B) comprises a fluid-storage section comprising a high-loadedfluid-absorbent layer wrapped in a homogenous layer of hydrophilicsynthetic fibers. The fluid-absorbent core is encapsulated by wrappingit both in a C-wrap and a full wrap configuration with a spunbondmaterial having a basis weight of 10 gsm. The density of thefluid-absorbent core is for the font overall average 0.16 g/cm³, for theinsult zone 0.25 g/cm³, for the back overall average 0.19 g/cm³. Thebasis weight of the fluid-absorbent core is for the front overallaverage 436.86 gsm, for the insult zone 707.74 gsm, for the back overallaverage 555.73 gsm. The thickness of the fluid-absorbent core has anaverage of 3.0 mm.

The fluid-absorbent core holds 80.3% by weight distributedwater-absorbent polymer particles, the quantity of water-absorbentpolymer particles within the fluid-absorbent core is 11.8 g.

The water-absorbent polymer particles derived from dropletizationpolymerization as described in example 13e, exhibiting the followingfeatures and absorption profile:

CRC of 27.5 g/g

SFC of 129×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 20.3 g/g

Moisture content of 7.7 wt. %

Vortex time of 78 s

GBP of 98 Darcies

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent core: length: 40.8 cm; front width:14.2 cm; crotch width: 14.5 cm; rear width: 14.1 cm.

An air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A) and (C)having a basis weight of 35.7 gsm is rectangular shaped and smaller thanthe fluid-absorbent core having a size of 24.0 cm×9.2 cm.

The fluid-absorbent article further comprises:

flat rubber elastics; elastics from spandex type fibers: 5 cuff elastics

leg cuffs from synthetic fibers showing the layer combination SMS andhaving a basis weight of between 13 to 17 gsm and a height of 4.7 cm

For improving the fit of the fluid-absorbent article, the stretchablepant of embodiment 12 provides elastics from spandex type fibers.

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent article: length: 47.9 cm; front width:31.3 cm; crotch width: 15.4 cm; rear width: 31.3 cm.

Embodiment 13

A further preferred embodiment of the present invention is described inEmbodiment 13 hereinafter. Thus, a preferred fluid-absorbent articlecomprising

an upper liquid-pervious layer comprising a spunbonded layer(coverstock);

a lower liquid-impervious layer comprising a composite of breathablepolyethylene film and spunbond nonwoven;

a high-loaded single fluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprisingbetween 55 to 95% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles based onthe total absorbent core weight including a fluid-storage sectioncomprising a high-loaded fluid-absorbent layer wrapped with a spunbondmaterial; said high-loaded fluid-absorbent layer compriseswater-absorbent polymer particles; suitable water-absorbent polymerparticles for such construction having a saline flow conductivity (SFC)of at least 80×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g; said homogenous wrapping of spunbondmaterial contains about 100% of the total fluff amount; anda system of two acquisition-distribution layers between (A) and (C),comprising an upper resinbonded layer having a basis weight of 40 to 80gsm; the upper acquisition-distribution layer is rectangular shapedhaving a size of about 150 to about 250 cm²; the loweracquisition-distribution layer comprising of synthetic fibers having abasis weight of 40 to 80 gsm and a size of about 100 to about 300 cm²;the upper acquisition-distribution layer is smaller than the loweracquisition-distribution layer; both acquisition-distribution layers aresmaller than the fluid-absorbent core.

The construction of the products chassis and the components containedtherein is made and controlled by the discrete application of hotmeltadhesives as known to people skilled in the art. Examples would be e.g.Dispomelt 505B, Dispomelt Cool 1101, as well as other specific functionadhesives manufactured by National Starch or Henkel.

Ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers can be formed byimmobilization of water-absorbent polymer particles on a non-woven sheetusing hotmelt adhesives. Preferably the water-absorbent polymerparticles form longitudinal strips or discrete spots. Other patterns ofthe water-absorbent polymer particles are also possible.

In a preferred embodiment the ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbentlayers comprise at least two sheets comprising immobilizedwater-absorbent polymer particles.

Examples of ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers are describedin EP 1 293 187 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,972,011, EP 1 447 066 A1, EP 1 447067 A1, EP 1 609 448 A1, JP 2004/313580, US 2005/0137085, US2006/0004336, US 2007/0135785 WO 2008/155699 A1, WO 2008/155701 A2, WO2008/155702 A1, WO 2008/155710 A1, WO 2008/155711 A1, WO 2004/071363 A1,US 2003/0181115, WO 2005/097025, US 2007/156108, US 2008/0125735, and WO2008/155722 A2, which explicitly forms part of the present disclosure.

Construction Example of Embodiment 13

The fluid-absorbent core consists of a high-loaded mixed single coresystem having an almost uniform rectangular size. The fluid-absorbentcore between (A) and (B) comprises a fluid-storage section comprising ahigh-loaded fluid-absorbent layer wrapped in a homogenous layer ofhydrophilic spunbond fibers having a basis weight of 10 gsm. The densityof the fluid-absorbent core is for the front overall average 0.20 g/cm³,for the insult zone 0.19 g/cm³, for the back overall average 0.19 g/cm³.The basis weight of the fluid-absorbent core is for the front overallaverage 1114 gsm, for the insult zone 1007 gsm, for the back overallaverage 658 gsm. The thickness of the fluid-absorbent core has anaverage of 4.5 mm.

The fluid-absorbent layer holds 67.2% by weight distributedwater-absorbent polymer particles, the quantity of water-absorbentpolymer particles within the fluid-absorbent core is 14.1 g.

The water-absorbent polymer particles derived from dropletizationpolymerization as described in example 17b, exhibiting the followingfeatures and absorption profile:

CRC of 28.6 g/g

SFC of 98×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 21.6 g/g

Moisture content of 6.3 wt. %

Vortex time of 75 s

GBP of 62 Darcies

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent core: length: 43.0 cm; front width:11.5 cm; crotch width: 7.2 cm; rear width: 12.1 cm.

The upper air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A)and the lower acquisition-distribution layer having a basis weight of65.7 gsm is rectangular shaped with dimensions of 24.9 cm×7 cm. Thelower air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between theupper acquisition-distribution layer and (C) is rectangular shaped withdimensions of 24.9 cm×7.5 cm. Both acquisition-distribution layers aresmaller than the fluid-absorbent core.

The fluid-absorbent article further comprises:

flat rubber elastics; elastics from spandex type fibers: 3 leg elasticsand 2 cuff elastics

leg cuffs from synthetic fibers showing the layer combination SMS andhaving a basis weight of between 13 to 17 gsm and a height of 3.4 cm

mechanical closure system with landing zone of dimension 14.9 cm×3.8 cmand adhesive closure tapes of 3.0 cm×1.3 cm; attached to hook fasteningtape of 3.0 cm×1.3 cm

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent article: length: 50.9 cm; front width:24.5 cm; crotch width: 24.3 cm; rear width: 24.5 cm.

Embodiment 14

A further preferred embodiment of the present invention is described inEmbodiment 14 hereinafter. Thus, a preferred fluid-absorbent articlecomprising

an upper liquid-pervious layer comprising a spunbonded layer(coverstock);

a lower liquid-impervious layer comprising a composite of breathablepolyethylene film and spunbond nonwoven;

a high-loaded single fluid-absorbent core between (A) and (B) comprisingbetween 55 to 95% by weight water-absorbent polymer particles based onthe total absorbent core weight including a fluid-storage sectioncomprising a high-loaded fluid-absorbent layer wrapped with a spunbondmaterial; said high-loaded fluid-absorbent layer compriseswater-absorbent polymer particles; suitable water-absorbent polymerparticles for such construction having a saline flow conductivity (SFC)of at least 80×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g; said homogenous wrapping of spunbondmaterial contains about 100% of the total fluff amount; anda system of two acquisition-distribution layers between (A) and (C),comprising an upper resinbonded layer having a basis weight of 40 to 80gsm; the upper acquisition-distribution layer is rectangular shapedhaving a size of about 150 to about 250 cm²; the loweracquisition-distribution layer comprising of synthetic fibers having abasis weight of 40 to 80 gsm and a size of about 100 to about 300 cm²;the upper acquisition-distribution layer is smaller than the loweracquisition-distribution layer; both acquisition-distribution layers aresmaller than the fluid-absorbent core;

The construction of the products chassis and the components containedtherein is made and controlled by the discrete application of hotmeltadhesives as known to people skilled in the art. Examples would be e.g.Dispomelt 505B, Dispomelt Cool 1101, as well as other specific functionadhesives manufactured by National Starch or Henkel.

Ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers can be formed byimmobilization of water-absorbent polymer particles on a non-woven sheetusing hotmelt adhesives. Preferably the water-absorbent polymerparticles form longitudinal strips or discrete spots. Other patterns ofthe water-absorbent polymer particles are also possible.

In a preferred embodiment the ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbentlayers comprise at least two sheets comprising immobilizedwater-absorbent polymer particles.

Examples of ultra-thin high-loaded fluid-absorbent layers are describedin EP 1 293 187 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,972,011, EP 1 447 066 A1, EP 1 447067 A1, EP 1 609 448 A1, JP 2004/313580, US 2005/0137085, US2006/0004336, US 2007/0135785 WO 2008/155699 A1, WO 2008/155701 A2, WO2008/155702 A1, WO 2008/155710 A1, WO 2008/155711 A1, WO 2004/071363 A1,US 2003/0181115, WO 2005/097025, US 2007/156108, US 2008/0125735, and WO2008/155722 A2, which explicitly forms part of the present disclosure.

Construction Example of Embodiment 14

The fluid-absorbent core consists of a high-loaded mixed single coresystem having an almost uniform rectangular size. The fluid-absorbentcore between (A) and (B) comprises a fluid-storage section comprising ahigh-loaded fluid-absorbent layer wrapped in a homogenous layer ofhydrophilic spunbond fibers having a basis weight of 10 gsm. The densityof the fluid-absorbent core is for the front overall average 0.25 g/cm³,for the insult zone 0.25 g/cm³, for the back overall average 0.26 g/cm³.The basis weight of the fluid-absorbent core is for the front overallaverage 878.70 gsm, for the insult zone 1237.56 gsm, for the backoverall average 495.60 gsm. The thickness of the fluid-absorbent corehas an average of 3.1 mm.

The fluid-absorbent layer holds 100% by weight distributedwater-absorbent polymer particles, the quantity of water-absorbentpolymer particles within the fluid-absorbent core is 14.14 g.

The water-absorbent polymer particles derived from dropletizationpolymerization as described in example 19i, exhibiting the followingfeatures and absorption profile:

CRC of 30.2 g/g

SFC of 118×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 19.7 g/g

Moisture content of 8.4 wt. %

Vortex time of 58 s

GBP of 54 Darcies

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent core: length: 42.4 cm; front width:10.6 cm; crotch width: 10.2 cm; rear width: 10.5 cm.

The upper air through bonded acquisition-distribution layer between (A)and the lower acquisition-distribution layer having a basis weight of58.8 gsm is rectangular shaped with dimensions of 24.7 cm×7.3 cm. Thelower air through bonded acquisition-distri-bution layer between theupper acquisition-distribution layer and (C) is rectangular shaped withdimensions of 20.3 cm×8.2 cm. Both acquisition-distribution layers aresmaller than the fluid-absorbent core.

The fluid-absorbent article further comprises:

flat rubber elastics; elastics from spandex type fibers: 2 leg elasticsand 2 cuff elastics

leg cuffs from synthetic fibers showing the layer combination SMS andhaving a basis weight of between 13 to 17 gsm and a height of 4.4 cm

waistband: front: 13.7 cm×2.1 cm; rear: 14.8 cm×2.2 cm

Dimension of the fluid-absorbent article: length: 46.7 cm; front width:33.5 cm; crotch width: 16.0 cm; rear width: 33.5 cm.

The water-absorbent polymer particles and the fluid-absorbent articlesare tested by means of the test methods described below.

Methods:

The measurements should, unless stated otherwise, be carried out at anambient temperature of 23±2° C. and a relative atmospheric humidity of50±10%. The water-absorbent polymers are mixed thoroughly before themeasurement.

Saline Flow Conductivity (SFC)

The saline flow conductivity is, as described in EP 0 640 330 A1,determined as the gel layer permeability of a swollen gel layer ofwater-absorbent polymer particles, although the apparatus described onpage 19 and in FIG. 8 in the aforementioned patent application wasmodified to the effect that the glass frit (40) is no longer used, theplunger (39) consists of the same polymer material as the cylinder (37)and now comprises 21 bores having a diameter of 9.65 mm each distributeduniformly over the entire contact surface. The procedure and theevaluation of the measurement remains unchanged from EP 0 640 330 A1.The flow rate is recorded automatically.

The saline flow conductivity (SFC) is calculated as follows:SFC[cm³s/g]=(Fg(t=0)×L0)/(d×A×WP),where Fg(t=0) is the flow rate of NaCl solution in g/s, which isobtained by means of a linear regression analysis of the Fg(t) data ofthe flow determinations by extrapolation to t=0, L0 is the thickness ofthe gel layer in cm, d is the density of the NaCl solution in g/cm³, Ais the surface area of the gel layer in cm² and WP is the hydrostaticpressure over the gel layer in dyn/cm².Free Swell Rate (FSR)

1.00 g (=W1) of the dry water-absorbent polymer particles is weighedinto a 25 ml glass beaker and is uniformly distributed on the base ofthe glass beaker. 20 ml of a 0.9% by weight sodium chloride solution arethen dispensed into a second glass beaker, the content of this beaker israpidly added to the first beaker and a stopwatch is started. As soon asthe last drop of salt solution is absorbed, confirmed by thedisappearance of the reflection on the liquid surface, the stopwatch isstopped. The exact amount of liquid poured from the second beaker andabsorbed by the polymer in the first beaker is accurately determined byweighing back the second beaker (=W2). The time needed for theabsorption, which was measured with the stopwatch, is denoted t. Thedisappearance of the last drop of liquid on the surface is defined astime t.

The free swell rate (FSR) is calculated as follows:FSR[g/gs]=W2/(W1×t)

When the moisture content of the hydrogel-forming polymer is more than3% by weight, however, the weight W1 must be corrected for this moisturecontent.

Vortex

50.0±1.0 ml of 0.9% NaCl solution are added into a 100 ml beaker. Acylindrical stirrer bar (30×6 mm) is added and the saline solution isstirred on a stir plate at 60 rpm. 2.000±0.010 g of water-absorbentpolymer particles are added to the beaker as quickly as possible,starting a stop watch as addition begins. The stopwatch is stopped whenthe surface of the mixture becomes “still” that means the surface has noturbulence, and while the mixture may still turn, the entire surface ofparticles turns as a unit. The displayed time of the stopwatch isrecorded as Vortex time.

Compression Damage Test

Into a plastic cup (outer height is 50 mm, inner height (depth) is 38.1mm, outer diameter is 76.2 mm, and inner diameter is 50.8 mm) is placeda steel disk measuring 50.75 mm in diameter and 3.18 mm in thickness.10.0±0.05 g of water-absorbent polymer particles are placed in the cupand distributed evenly. A steel cylinder (piston size is: diameter=50.75mm and height=44.45 mm; the weight of the piston is 712.2 g) is thenplaced on the water-absorbent polymer particles. The assembled apparatusis then placed in a Carver Press model Auto Series 4425.4DI0A01 (CarverInc.; Wabash; USA). The force setting on the press is set to the targetvalue plus 200 lbs. Compression is initiated and when the digitalreading indicates the desired target value the compression is manuallystopped. The damaged water-absorbent polymer particles are then removedwith the aid of a brush such that the full amount is removed within 0.5%by weight of the starting quantity.

Blender Damage Test

An Osterizer Blender model 6749-12 speed, 450 watt motor (SunbeamProducts Inc.; Boca Raton; USA) with a 5 cup glass blending jar isconnected to a variable voltage supply source such as a Variaccontroller. The voltage controller is adjusted such that the operatingspeed of the blender is 10,500 rpm. The blender jar is treated with ananti-static agent (such as Staticide available from VWR). Then 25.0±0.05g of water-absorbent polymer particles are placed in the blender and theblender jar lid is placed on the jar. The unit is turned on through thevariable voltage source and run for the targeted time. After blendingthe dust is allowed to settle in the jar for three minutes. The lid isthen removed and the damaged water-absorbent polymer particles are thenisolated with the aid of a brush such that the full amount is removedwithin 0.5% by weight of the starting quantity.

Morphology

Particle morphologies of the water-absorbent polymer particles wereinvestigated in the swollen state by microscope analysis. Approximately100 mg of the water-absorbent polymer particles were placed on a glassmicroscope slide. With a syringe, 0.9% aqueous NaCl solution was placedon the water-absorbent polymer particles to swell them. Solution wasconstantly refilled as it was absorbed by the particles. Care has to betaken that the water-absorbent polymer particles do not run dry. After30 min swelling time, the slide was put under the microscope (LeicaMacroscope Z16 APO, magnification 20×, backlighting by a Schott KL2500LCD cold light source, camera Leica DFC 420, all by Leica MicrosystemeVertrieb GmbH; Wetzlar; Germany) and 3 pictures were taken at differentparts of the sample.

Morphologies can be divided into there categories: Type 1 are particleswith one cavity having diameters from 0.4 to 2.5 mm, Type 2 areparticles with more than one cavity having diameters from 0.001 to 0.3mm, and Type 3 are solid particles with no visible cavity.

FIG. 9 shows a swollen particle of type 1 with a cavity having adiameter of 0.94 mm and FIG. 10 shows a swollen particle of type 2 withmore than 15 cavities having diameters from less than 0.03 to 0.13 mm.

The photograph is analyzed and the numbers of each category is recorded.Undefined or agglomerated particles are omitted from further evaluation.The individual results of the three photographs of each sample areaveraged.

Free Swell Gel Bed Permeability (GBP)

The method to determine the free swell gel bed permeability is describedin US 2005/0256757, paragraphs [0061] to [0075].

Residual Monomers

The level of residual monomers in the water-absorbent polymer particlesis determined by the EDANA recommended test method No. WSP 410.2-05“Residual Monomers”.

Particle Size Distribution

The particle size distribution of the water-absorbent polymer particlesis determined with the Camziser® image analysis system (RetschTechnology GmbH; Haan; Germany).

For determination of the average particle diameter and the particlediameter distribution the proportions of the particle fractions byvolume are plotted in cumulated form and the average particle diameteris determined graphically.

The average particle diameter (APD) here is the value of the mesh sizewhich gives rise to a cumulative 50% by weight.

The particle diameter distribution (PDD) is calculated as follows:

${{P\; D\; D} = \frac{x_{2} - x_{1}}{A\; P\; D}},$wherein x₁ is the value of the mesh size which gives rise to acumulative 90% by weight and x₂ is the value of the mesh size whichgives rise to a cumulative 10% by weight.Mean Sphericity

The mean sphericity is determined with the Camziser® image analysissystem (Retsch Technology GmbH; Haan; Germany) using the particlediameter fraction from 100 to 1,000 μm.

Moisture Content

The moisture content of the water-absorbent polymer particles isdetermined by the EDANA recommended test method No. WSP 430.2-05“Moisture Content”.

Centrifuge Retention Capacity (CRC)

The centrifuge retention capacity of the water-absorbent polymerparticles is determined by the EDANA recommended test method No. WSP441.2-05 “Centrifuge Retention Capacity”, wherein for higher values ofthe centrifuge retention capacity lager tea bags have to be used.

Absorbency Under High Load (AUHL)

The absorbency under high load of the water-absorbent polymer particlesis determined analogously to the EDANA recommended test method No. WSP442.2-05 “Absorption Under Pressure”, except using a weight of 49.2g/cm² instead of a weight of 21.0 g/cm².

Bulk Density

The bulk density of the water-absorbent polymer particles is determinedby the EDANA recommended test method No. WSP 460.2-05 “Density”.

Extractables

The level of extractable constituents in the water-absorbent polymerparticles is determined by the EDANA recommended test method No. WSP470.2-05 “Extractables”.

The EDANA test methods are obtainable, for example, from the EDANA,Avenue Eugene Plasky 157, B-1030 Brussels, Belgium.

EXAMPLES Preparation of the Base Polymer Example 1

The process was performed in a cocurrent spray drying plant with anintegrated fluidized bed (27) and an external fluidized bed (29) asshown in FIG. 1. The cylindrical part of the spray dryer (5) had aheight of 22 m and a diameter of 3.4 m. The internal fluidized bed (IFB)had a diameter of 2.0 m and a weir height of 0.4 m. The externalfluidized bed (EFB) had a length of 3.0 m, a width of 0.65 m and a weirheight of 0.5 m.

The drying gas was feed via a gas distributor (3) at the top of thespray dryer. The drying gas was partly recycled (drying gas loop) via abaghouse filter (9) and a condenser column (12). The drying gas wasnitrogen that comprises from 1% to 5% by volume of residual oxygen.Before start of polymerization the drying gas loop was filled withnitrogen until the residual oxygen was below 5% by volume. The gasvelocity of the drying gas in the cylindrical part of the spray dryer(5) was 0.73 m/s. The pressure inside the spray dryer was 4 mbar belowambient pressure.

The spray dryer outlet temperature was measured at three points aroundthe circumference at the end of the cylindrical part as shown in FIG. 3.Three single measurements (47) were used to calculate the averagecylindrical spray dryer outlet temperature. The drying gas loop washeated up and the dosage of monomer solution is started up. From thistime the spray dryer outlet temperature was controlled to 125° C. byadjusting the gas inlet temperature via the heat exchanger (20).

The product accumulated in the internal fluidized bed (27) until theweir height was reached. Conditioned internal fluidized bed gas having atemperature of 96° C. and a relative humidity of 45% was fed to theinternal fluidized bed (27) via line (25). The relative humidity wascontrolled by adding steam via line (23). The gas velocity of theinternal fluidized bed gas in the internal fluidized bed (27) was 0.8m/s. The residence time of the product was 35 min.

The spray dryer offgas was filtered in baghouse filter (9) and sent to acondenser column (12) for quenching/cooling. Excess water was pumped outof the condenser column (12) by controlling the (constant) filling levelinside the condenser column (12). The water inside the condenser column(12) was cooled by a heat exchanger (13) and pumped counter-current tothe gas via quench nozzles (11) so that the temperature inside thecondenser column (12) was 45° C. The water inside the condenser column(12) was set to an alkaline pH by dosing sodium hydroxide solution towash out acrylic acid vapors.

The condenser column offgas was split to the drying gas inlet pipe (1)and the conditioned internal fluidized bed gas (25). The gastemperatures were controlled via heat exchangers (20) and (22). The hotdrying gas was fed to the cocurrent spray dryer via gas distributor (3).The gas distributor (3) consists of a set of plates providing a pressuredrop of 5 to 10 mbar depending on the drying gas amount.

The product was discharged from the internal fluidized bed (27) viarotary valve (28) into external fluidized bed (29). Conditioned externalfluidized bed gas having a temperature of 55° C. was fed to the externalfluidized bed (29) via line (40). The external fluidized bed gas wasair. The gas velocity of the external fluidized bed gas in the externalfluidized bed (29) was 0.8 m/s. The residence time of the product was 11min.

The product was discharged from the external fluidized bed (29) viarotary valve (32) into sieve (33). The sieve (33) was used for sievingoff overs/lumps having a particle diameter of more than 850 μm.

The monomer solution was prepared by mixing first acrylic acid with3-tuply ethoxylated glycerol triacrylate (internal crosslinker) andsecondly with 37.3% by weight sodium acrylate solution. The temperatureof the resulting monomer solution was controlled to 10° C. by using aheat exchanger and pumping in a loop. A filter unit having a mesh sizeof 250 μm was used in the loop after the pump. The initiators weremetered into the monomer solution upstream of the dropletizer by meansof static mixers (41) and (42) via lines (43) and (44) as shown inFIG. 1. Sodium peroxodisulfate solution having a temperature of 20° C.was added via line (43) and 2,2′-azobis[2-(2-imidazolin-2-yl)pro-pane]dihydrochloride solution having a temperature of 5° C. was added vialine (44). Each initiator was pumped in a loop and dosed via controlvalves to each dropletizer unit. A second filter unit having a mesh sizeof 100 μm was used after the static mixer (42). For dosing the monomersolution into the top of the spray dryer three dropletizer units wereused as shown in FIG. 4.

A dropletizer unit consisted of an outer pipe (51) having an opening forthe dropletizer cassette (53) as shown in FIG. 5. The dropletizercassette (53) was connected with an inner pipe (52). The inner pipe (53)having a PTFE block (54) at the end as sealing can be pushed in and outof the outer pipe (51) during operation of the process for maintenancepurposes.

The temperature of the dropletizer cassette (61) was controlled to 25°C. by water in flow channels (59) as shown in FIG. 6. The dropletizercassette had 250 bores having a diameter of 200 μm and a bore separationof 15 mm. The dropletizer cassette (61) consisted of a flow channel (60)having essential no stagnant volume for homogeneous distribution of thepremixed monomer and initiator solutions and two droplet plates (57).The droplet plates (57) had an angled configuration with an angle of10°. Each droplet plate (57) was made of stainless steel and had alength of 500 mm, a width of 25 mm, and a thickness of 1 mm.

The feed to the spray dryer consisted of 10.25% by weight of acrylicacid 32.75% by weigh of sodium acrylate, 0.074% by weight of 3-tuplyethoxylated glycerol triacrylate (approx. 85% strength by weight), 0.12%by weight of 2,2′-azobis[2-(2-imidazolin-2-yl)propane] dihydrochloridesolution (15% by weigh in water), 0.12% by weight of sodiumperoxodisulfate solution (15% by weight in water) and water. The degreeof neutralization was 71%. The feed per bore was 2.0 kg/h.

The resulting polymer particles had a bulk density of 70.4 g/100 ml, anaverage particle diameter of 424 μm, a particle diameter distribution of0.57, and a mean sphericity of 0.91.

The resulting polymer particles were analyzed using the Blender DamageTest and the Compression Damage Test. The results are compiled in tables1 and 2.

TABLE 1 Blender Damage Test Blend Moisture CRC AUHL SFC time [s] (wt. %)[g/g] [g/g] [10⁻⁷ cm³s/g] 0 6.0 33.0 24.6 12 5 6.1 33.3 24.3 12 15 6.233.3 24.5 10 30 6.1 33.0 22.7 8 38 6.2 33.0 22.3 8

TABLE 2 Compression Damage Test Force Moisture CRC AUHL SFC [kg/cm²](wt. %) [g/g] [g/g] [10⁻⁷ cm³s/g] 0 6.0 33.0 24.6 12 22.3 6.0 33.4 24.313 55.7 6.1 33.6 25.2 14 111.4 6.1 33.4 24.0 13 133.7 6.1 33.9 24.7 12

Also, the morphology of the resulting polymer particles was analyzed.The ratio of type 1 to type 2 was 0.19.

Further, 200 g of the resulting polymer particles were sieved through aRetsch AS 200 basic sieving machine (Retsch GmbH, Haan; Germany)containing sieves having mesh sizes of 100 μm, 200 μm, 300 μm, 400 μm,500 μm, 600 μm, 710 μm, and 850 μm. For the individual sieve fractionscentrifuge retention capacity, absorption under high load and salineflow conductivity were determined, if the amount of material was morethan 2 g. The performance of the individual sieve fractions are listedin table 3.

TABLE 3 Performance of the sieve fractions CRC AUHL sieve fraction [g/g][g/g] 500-600 μm 29.8 22.8 400-500 μm 33.4 24.5 300-400 μm 34.3 24.2200-300 μm 32.5 22.4

Example 2 Comparative Example

Example 1 was repeated, except that spray dryer outlet temperature wasadjusted to 138° C., gas velocity of the drying gas in the cylindricalpart of the spray dryer (5) was 0.29 m/s, and the separation of thebores was 5 mm. For dosing the monomer solution into the top of thespray dryer one dropletizer unit with 360 bores having a diameter of 200μm was used.

The conditioned internal fluidized bed gas had a temperature of 105° C.and a relative humidity of 23%. The residence time in the internalfluidized bed was 104 min. The conditioned external fluidized bed gashad a temperature of 60° C. The residence time in the internal fluidizedbed was 33 min.

The feed to the spray dryer consisted of 10.25% by weight of acrylicacid 32.75% by weigh of sodium acrylate, 0.085% by weight of 3-tuplyethoxylated glycerol triacrylate (approx. 85% strength by weight), 0.11%by weight of 2,2′-azobis[2-(2-imidazolin-2-yl)-propane] dihydrochloridesolution (15% by weigh in water), 0.088% by weight of sodiumperoxodisulfate solution (15% by weight in water) and water. The feedper bore was 1.4 kg/h.

The resulting polymer particles had a bulk density of 41.3 g/100 ml, anaverage particle diameter of 581 μm, a particle diameter distribution of0.82, and a mean sphericity of 0.87.

The resulting polymer particles were analyzed using the Blender DamageTest and the Compression Damage Test. The results are compiled in tables4 and 5.

TABLE 4 Blender Damage Test Blend time Moisture CRC AUHL SFC [s] (wt. %)[g/g] [g/g] [10⁻⁷ cm³s/g] 0 6.2 29.7 21.9 16 5 6.2 29.4 20.5 12 15 6.328.6 18.5 9 30 6.1 28.3 16.8 8 38 6.2 28.1 15.5 9

TABLE 5 Compression Damage Test Force Moisture CRC AUHL SFC [kg/cm²](wt. %) [g/g] [g/g] [10⁻⁷ cm³s/g] 0 6.2 29.7 21.9 16 22.3 6.3 31.6 22.318 55.7 6.0 30.2 21.2 15 111.4 6.1 30.1 19.8 11 133.7 6.1 30.6 17.8 8

Also, the morphology of the resulting polymer particles was analyzed.The ratio of type 1 to type 2 was 1.7.

The inventive polymer particles of example 1 shows a smaller drop of theabsorbency under high load (AUHL) and of the saline flow conductivity(SFC) after damage compared to the non-inventive polymer particles ofexample 2 indicating that the inventive polymer particles have a higherdamage stability than the non-inventive polymer particles.

Further, the resulting polymer particles were sieved as disclosed inexample 1. The performance of the individual sieve fractions are listedin table 6.

TABLE 6 Performance of the sieve fractions CRC AUHL SFC sieve fraction[g/g] [g/g] [10⁻⁷ cm³s/g] >850 μm 20.0 17.0 61 710-850 μm 20.6 17.3 66600-710 μm 22.1 18.0 55 500-600 μm 25.4 19.8 35 400-500 μm 31.0 24.3 19300-400 μm 31.3 23.0 11 200-300 μm 30.3 21.1 8 100-200 μm 30.9 7.3 0

The inventive polymer particles of example 1 shows a smaller particlesize distribution and a smaller deviation of the centrifuge retentioncapacity (CRC) and of the absorbency under high load (AUHL) compared tothe non-inventive polymer particles of example 2.

Example 3 Comparative Example

Example 1 was repeated, except that spray dryer outlet temperature wasadjusted to 133° C., gas velocity of the drying gas in the cylindricalpart of the spray dryer (5) was 0.45 m/s, and the separation of thebores was 5 mm. For dosing the monomer solution into the top of thespray dryer one dropletizer unit with 360 bores having a diameter of 200μm was used.

The conditioned internal fluidized bed gas had a temperature of 85° C.and a relative humidity of 28%. The residence time in the internalfluidized bed was 104 min. The conditioned external fluidized bed gashad a temperature of 60° C. The residence time in the internal fluidizedbed was 33 min.

The feed to the spray dryer consisted of 10.25% by weight of acrylicacid 32.75% by weigh of sodium acrylate, 0.085% by weight of 3-tuplyethoxylated glycerol triacrylate (approx. 85% strength by weight), 0.11%by weight of 2,2′-azobis[2-(2-imidazolin-2-yl)-propane] dihydrochloridesolution (15% by weight in water), 0.088% by weight of sodiumperoxodisulfate solution (15% by weight in water) and water. The feedper bore was 1.4 kg/h.

The resulting polymer particles had a bulk density of 54.6 g/100 ml andan average particle diameter of 514 μm.

Example 4

Example 1 was repeated, except that spray dryer outlet temperature wasadjusted to 130° C. and gas velocity of the drying gas in thecylindrical part of the spray dryer (5) was 0.70 m/s. For dosing themonomer solution into the top of the spray dryer three dropletizer unitswith 200 bores having a diameter of 200 μm were used.

The conditioned internal fluidized bed gas had a temperature of 93° C.and a relative humidity of 48%. The residence time in the internalfluidized bed was 44 min. The residence time in the internal fluidizedbed was 14 min.

The feed to the spray dryer consisted of 10.25% by weight of acrylicacid 32.75% by weigh of sodium acrylate, 0.10% by weight of 3-tuplyethoxylated glycerol triacrylate (approx. 85% strength by weight), 0.12%by weight of 2,2′-azobis[2-(2-imidazolin-2-yl)-propane] dihydrochloridesolution (15% by weight in water), 0.088% by weight of sodiumperoxodisulfate solution (15% by weight in water) and water.

The polymer particles exhibit the following features and absorptionprofile:

CRC of 26.5 g/g

SFC of 36×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 21.6 g/g

Extractables of 2.0 wt. %

Residual monomers of 735 ppm

Moisture content of 11.1 wt. %

FSR of 0.35 g/gs

The resulting polymer particles had a bulk density of 59.3 g/100 ml, anaverage particle diameter of 440 μm, a particle diameter distribution of0.63, and a mean sphericity of 0.90.

Example 5

Example 1 was repeated, except that gas velocity of the drying gas inthe cylindrical part of the spray dryer (5) was 0.59 m/s. For dosing themonomer solution into the top of the spray dryer three dropletizer unitswith 200 bores having a diameter of 200 μm were used.

The conditioned internal fluidized bed gas had a temperature of 95° C.The residence time in the internal fluidized bed was 44 min. Theresidence time in the internal fluidized bed was 14 min.

The feed to the spray dryer consisted of 11.53% by weight of acrylicacid 31.97% by weigh of sodium acrylate, 0.079% by weight of 3-tuplyethoxylated glycerol triacrylate (approx. 85% strength by weight), 0.13%by weight of 2,2′-azobis[2-(2-imidazolin-2-yl)-propane] dihydrochloridesolution (15% by weight in water), 0.13% by weight of sodiumperoxodisulfate solution (15% by weight in water) and water. The degreeof neutralization was 68%.

The polymer particles exhibit the following features and absorptionprofile:

CRC of 28.9 g/g

SFC of 27×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 23.0 g/g

Residual monomers of 384 ppm

Moisture content of 9.5 wt. %

FSR of 0.3 g/gs

The resulting polymer particles had a bulk density of 69.9 g/100 ml andan average particle diameter of 421 μm.

Example 6

Example 1 was repeated, except that gas velocity of the drying gas inthe cylindrical part of the spray dryer (5) was 0.59 m/s. For dosing themonomer solution into the top of the spray dryer three dropletizer unitswith 200 bores having a diameter of 200 μm were used.

The conditioned internal fluidized bed gas had a temperature of 93° C.and a relative humidity of 46%. The residence time in the internalfluidized bed was 44 min. The residence time in the internal fluidizedbed was 14 min.

The feed to the spray dryer consisted of 11.53% by weight of acrylicacid 31.97% by weigh of sodium acrylate, 0.11% by weight of 3-tuplyethoxylated glycerol triacrylate (approx. 85% strength by weight), 0.13%by weight of 2,2′-azobis[2-(2-imidazolin-2-yl)-propane] dihydrochloridesolution (15% by weight in water), 0.13% by weight of sodiumperoxodisulfate solution (15% by weight in water) and water. The degreeof neutralization was 68%.

The polymer particles exhibit the following features and absorptionprofile:

CRC of 26.0 g/g

SFC of 54×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 21.8 g/g

Extractables of 1.0 wt. %

Residual monomers of 382 ppm

Moisture content of 9.0 wt. %

FSR of 0.25 g/gs

The resulting polymer particles had a bulk density of 72.6 g/100 ml andan average particle diameter of 417 μm.

Example 7

Example 1 was repeated, except that gas velocity of the drying gas inthe cylindrical part of the spray dryer (5) was 0.59 m/s. For dosing themonomer solution into the top of the spray dryer three dropletizer unitswith 200 bores having a diameter of 200 μm were used.

The conditioned internal fluidized bed gas had a temperature of 94° C.and a relative humidity of 38%. The residence time in the internalfluidized bed was 44 min. The residence time in the internal fluidizedbed was 14 min.

The feed to the spray dryer consisted of 10.25% by weight of acrylicacid 32.75% by weigh of sodium acrylate, 0.070% by weight of 3-tuplyethoxylated glycerol triacrylate (approx. 85% strength by weight), 0.12%by weight of 2,2′-azobis[2-(2-imidazolin-2-yl)-propane] dihydrochloridesolution (15% by weight in water), 0.12% by weight of sodiumperoxodisulfate solution (15% by weight in water) and water.

The polymer particles exhibit the following features and absorptionprofile:

CRC of 32.0 g/g

SFC of 20×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 24.0 g/g

Extractables of 1.7 wt. %

Residual monomers of 866 ppm

Moisture content of 5.8 wt. %

FSR of 0.31 g/gs

The resulting polymer particles had a bulk density of 71.9 g/100 ml andan average particle diameter of 409 μm.

Example 8

Example 1 was repeated, except that gas velocity of the drying gas inthe cylindrical part of the spray dryer (5) was 0.59 m/s and theseparation of the bores was 11 mm. For dosing the monomer solution intothe top of the spray dryer three dropletizer unit with 267 bores havinga diameter of 200 μm were used.

The residence time in the internal fluidized bed was 44 min. Theresidence time in the internal fluidized bed was 14 min.

The feed to the spray dryer consisted of 10.25% by weight of acrylicacid 32.75% by weigh of sodium acrylate, 0.055% by weight of 3-tuplyethoxylated glycerol triacrylate (approx. 85% strength by weight), 0.12%by weight of 2,2′-azobis[2-(2-imidazolin-2-yl)-propane] dihydrochloridesolution (15% by weight in water), 0.12% by weight of sodiumperoxodisulfate solution (15% by weight in water) and water. The feedper bore was 1.5 kg/h.

The polymer particles exhibit the following features and absorptionprofile:

CRC of 35.0 g/g

SFC of 8×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 21.6 g/g

Extractables of 2.1 wt. %

Residual monomers of 616 ppm

Moisture content of 9.4 wt. %

FSR of 0.28 g/gs

The resulting polymer particles had a bulk density of 70.7 g/100 ml andan average particle diameter of 426 μm.

Example 9

Example 1 was repeated, except that gas velocity of the drying gas inthe cylindrical part of the spray dryer (5) was 0.59 m/s and theseparation of the bores was 11 mm. For dosing the monomer solution intothe top of the spray dryer three dropletizer unit with 267 bores havinga diameter of 200 μm were used.

The conditioned internal fluidized bed gas had a temperature of 98° C.The residence time in the internal fluidized bed was 44 min. Theresidence time in the internal fluidized bed was 14 min.

The feed to the spray dryer consisted of 10.25% by weight of acrylicacid 32.75% by weigh of sodium acrylate, 0.039% by weight of 3-tuplyethoxylated glycerol triacrylate (approx. 85% strength by weight), 0.12%by weight of 2,2′-azobis[2-(2-imidazolin-2-yl)-propane] dihydrochloridesolution (15% by weight in water), 0.12% by weight of sodiumperoxodisulfate solution (15% by weight in water) and water. The feedper bore was 1.5 kg/h.

The polymer particles exhibit the following features and absorptionprofile:

CRC of 40.5 g/g

AUHL of 12.3 g/g

Extractables of 3.9 wt. %

Residual monomers of 818 ppm

Moisture content of 9.0 wt. %

FSR of 0.14 g/gs

The resulting polymer particles had a bulk density of 67.9 g/100 ml andan average particle diameter of 452 μm.

Postcrosslinking of the Base Polymer

Example 10

1 kg of the water-absorbent polymer particles prepared in example 8 wereput into a laboratory ploughshare mixer with a heated jacket (model M 5;manufactured by Gebrüder Lödige Maschinenbau GmbH; Paderborn; Germany).A postcrosslinker solution was prepared by mixing 0.60 g of Denacol® EX810 (ethylene glycol diglycidyl ether; obtained from Nagase ChemteXCorporation; Osaka; Japan), 20 g of propylene glycol, and 20 g ofdeionized water, into a beaker. At a mixer speed of 450 rpm, thepostcrosslinker solution was added dropwise using a syringe to thewater-absorbent polymer particles over a three minute time period atroom temperature. The mixer was then stopped, product sticking to thewall of the mixing vessel was scraped off (and re-united with the bulk),and mixing was continued for two more minutes at 450 rpm. The batch wasthen discharged into two stainless steel pans and placed in an oven at140° C. for one hour. The pans were then removed from the oven andallowed to cool in a desiccator. The cooled product was then sifted, at150 to 710 μm and characterized as follows:

CRC of 35.5 g/g

SFC of 16×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 26.2 g/g

Moisture content of 1.8 wt. %

Example 11

1 kg of the water-absorbent polymer particles prepared in example 9 wereput into a laboratory ploughshare mixer with a heated jacket (model M 5;manufactured by Gebrüder Lödige Maschinenbau GmbH; Paderborn; Germany).A postcrosslinker solution was prepared by mixing 10 g of 1,4-butanediol, 11.5 g of i-propanol, and 20 g of deionized water, into a beaker.At a mixer speed of 450 rpm, the postcrosslinker solution was added by aspray nozzle to the polymer powder over a three minute time period atroom temperature. The mixer was then stopped, product sticking to thewall of the mixing vessel was scraped off (and re-united with the bulk),and mixing was continued for two more minutes at 450 rpm. Thetemperature of the product was then raised to 190° C. by heating thejacket of the mixer. The product was kept at this temperature for 45minutes at a mixer speed of 80 rpm. After cooling down of the mixer, theproduct was discharged, sifted at 150 to 710 μm and characterized asfollows:

CRC of 36.2 g/g

SFC of 9×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

AUHL of 25.7 g/g

Moisture content of 0.3 wt. %

Example 12

1 kg of the water-absorbent polymer particles prepared in example 8 wereput into a la-boratory ploughshare mixer with a heated jacket (model M5; manufactured by Gebrü-der Lödige Maschinenbau GmbH; Paderborn;Germany). At a mixer speed of 300 rpm, 300 g of Aerosil® 130 (fumedsilica from Evonik Degussa GmbH; Frankfurt am Main; Germany) were addedand mixed for 3 minutes at room temperature. A postcrosslinker solutionwas prepared by mixing 0.75 g of N-(2-hydroxy ethyl)-2-oxazolidinone,0.75 g of 1,3-propane diol, 10 g of i-propanol, 20 g of an aqueousaluminium sulphate solution (26.8 wt.-% of strength), and 10 g ofdeionized water, into a beaker. At a mixer speed of 450 rpm, thepostcrosslinker solution was added by a spray nozzle to the polymerpow-der over a three minute time period at room temperature. The mixerwas then stopped, product sticking to the wall of the mixing vessel wasscraped off (and re-united with the bulk), and mixing was continued fortwo more minutes at 450 rpm. The temperature of the product was thenraised to 188° C. by heating the jacket of the mixer. The product waskept at this temperature for 60 minutes at a mixer speed of 80 rpm.After cooling down of the mixer, the product was discharged, sifted at150 to 710 μm and characterized as follows:

CRC of 25.5 g/g

SFC of 160×10⁻⁷ cm³s/g

GBP of 120 Darcies

AUHL of 22.3 g/g

Moisture content of 0.2 wt. %

Example 13

In a laboratory ploughshare mixer with a heated jacket (model M 5;manufactured by Gebrüder Lödige Maschinenbau GmbH; Paderborn; Germany)800 g of the water-absorbent polymer particles prepared in example 8were mixed at a speed of 325 rpm while a solution containing 0.8 g ofDenacol® EX 512 (polyglycerol polyglycidyl ether; obtained from NagaseChemteX Corporation; Osaka; Japan), 6 g of 1,2-propane diol and 12 g ofwater was added dropwise. Then 16 g of aqueous aluminium lactatesolution (25 wt.-% of strength) was added dropwise. The water-absorbentpolymer particles and added solutions werethen allowed to mix at 325 rpmfor 60 seconds.

This mixture was then transferred to a second laboratory ploughsharemixer that had been pre-heated to 200° C. and running at a speed of 150rpm. Following the temperature drop that results from adding the coldpowder, the temperature was maintained at 160° C. Samples were thentaken at various time, with t=0 minutes corresponding to the moment whenthe temperature in the second Loedige reached 160° C. after the powderwas added. Samples were then passed through standard 150 and 850 micronsieves to remove any large or fine particles that may have resulted fromthe coating process. The performance results are tabulated below:

TABLE 7 Postcrosslinking with Polyglycerol Polyglycidyl Ether/AluminiumLactate Cure Time CRC AUHL SFC FSR [min] [g/g] [g/g] [10⁻⁷ cm³s/g][g/gs] 0 34.1 27.1 42 0.23 15 33.5 27.4 51 0.22 30 33.5 27.0 52 0.21 6031.6 26.8 63 0.21 90 31.2 26.2 74 0.21

Example 14

In a laboratory ploughshare mixer with a heated jacket (model M 5;manufactured by Gebrüder Lödige Maschinenbau GmbH; Paderborn; Germany)800 g of the water-absorbent polymer particles prepared in example 8were mixed at a speed of 325 rpm while a solution containing 0.8 g ofDenacol® EX 512 (polyglycerol polyglycidyl ether; obtained from NagaseChemteX Corporation; Osaka; Japan), 6 g of 1,2-propane diol and 12 g ofwater was added dropwise. Then 20 g of aqueous aluminium sulfatesolution (27.5 wt.-% of strength) was added dropwise. Thewater-absorbent polymer particles and added solutions werethen allowedto mix at 325 rpm for 60 seconds.

This mixture was then transferred to a second laboratory ploughsharemixer that had been pre-heated to 200° C. and running at a speed of 150rpm. Following the temperature drop that results from adding the coldpowder, the temperature was maintained at 160° C. Samples were thentaken at various time, with t=0 minutes corresponding to the moment whenthe temperature in the second Loedige reached 160° C. after the powderwas added. Samples were then passed through standard 150 and 850 micronsieves to remove any large or fine particles that may have resulted fromthe coating process. The performance results are tabulated below:

TABLE 8 Postcrosslinking with Polyglycerol Polyglycidyl Ether/AluminiumSulfate Cure Time CRC AUHL GBP [min] [g/g] [g/g] [Darcies] 0 34.1 24.448 15 32.8 24.2 65 30 32.2 24.1 68 60 31.2 23.8 66 90 30.9 23.4 83

Example 15

In a laboratory ploughshare mixer with a heated jacket (model M 5;manufactured by Gebrüder Lödige Maschinenbau GmbH; Paderborn; Germany)800 g of the water-absorbent polymer particles prepared in example 9were mixed at a speed of 325 rpm while a solution containing 0.8 g ofDenacol® EX 512 (polyglycerol polyglycidyl ether; obtained from NagaseChemteX Corporation; Osaka; Japan), 6 g of 1,2-propane diol and 12 g ofwater was added dropwise. The water-absorbent polymer particles andadded solutions werethen allowed to mix at 325 rpm for 60 seconds.

This mixture was then transferred to a second laboratory ploughsharemixer that had been pre-heated to 200° C. and running at a speed of 150rpm. Following the temperature drop that results from adding the coldpowder, the temperature was maintained at 160° C. Samples were thentaken at various time, with t=0 minutes corresponding to the moment whenthe temperature in the second Loedige reached 160° C. after the powderwas added. Samples were then passed through standard 150 and 850 micronsieves to remove any large or fine particles that may have resulted fromthe coating process. The performance results are tabulated below:

TABLE 9 Postcrosslinking with Polyglycerol Polyglycidyl Ether Cure TimeCRC AUHL SFC Vortex FSR [min] [g/g] [g/g] [10⁻⁷ cm³s/g] [s] [g/gs] 041.9 30.4 93 0.23 15 43.2 30.4 102 0.22 30 40.8 29.6 7 95 0.21 60 39.129.5 95 0.21 90 38.5 29.2 12 104 0.20

Coating of the Base Polymer Example 16

800 g of the water-absorbent polymer particles were added in amechanical plough share mixer (Pflugschar® Mischer Typ M5; Gebr. LödigeMaschinenbau GmbH; Paderborn; Germany) at room temperature. At astirring speed of 200 rpm, the water-absor-bent polymer particles werecoated with a 26.8 wt.-% aqueous solution of aluminum sulfate within 4minutes. The amount of aluminum sulfate is given in the table below,calculated as weight-% of solid aluminum sulfate on water-absorbentpolymer particles. The speed of the mixer was reduced after coating to60 rpm and the product was mixed for 5 more minutes at these conditions.After removal of the product from the mixer, it was sieved over an 850μm screen to remove potential agglomerates.

The resulting coated water-absorbent polymer particles were analyzed,the results are summarized in table 10.

TABLE 10 Coating with Aluminum Sulfate Base Al₂(SO₄)₃ CRC AUHL SFC GBPVortex Moisture Example polymer [wt.-%] [g/g] [g/g] [10⁻⁷ cm³s/g][Darcies] [s] [wt. %] 16a Ex. 1 1.00 29.2 19.6 40 34 56 12.6 16b Ex. 51.00 30.1 20.0 41 48 68 8.5 16c Ex. 5 0.50 31.5 22.9 35 34 63 7.9 16dEx. 5 0.75 31.0 19.7 39 39 62 8.8 16e Ex. 6 1.00 27.5 20.3 129 98 78 7.716f Ex. 7 1.00 31.4 16.2 23 32 60 7.3

Example 17

Example 16 was repeated but with a 22.0 wt.-% aqueous aluminum lactatecoating solution instead of an aqueous aluminum sulfate solution. Theamount of aluminum lactate that was coated on the water-absorbentpolymer particles is given in table 11, calculated as weight-% of solidaluminum lactate on water-absorbent polymer particles.

The resulting coated water-absorbent polymer particles were analyzed.The results are summarized in table 11.

TABLE 11 Coating with Aluminum Lactate Base Aluminiumlactate CRC AUHLSFC Vortex Moisture Example polymer [wt.-%] [g/g] [g/g] [10⁻⁷ cm³s/g][s] [wt. %] 17a Ex. 1 1.00 28.6 22.6 38 70 12.9 17b Ex. 4 0.50 26.6 23.642 60 13.0 17c Ex. 4 1.00 26.3 22.0 61 54 13.1 17e Ex. 5 1.00 31.5 24.049 65 6.2

Example 18

Example 16 was repeated but with a 30 wt.-% aqueous dispersion ofcalcium phosphate (Tricalciumphosphat C53-80; Chemische Fabrik BudenheimKG; Budenheim; Germany) instead of an aqueous aluminum sulfate solution.The amount of aqueous dispersion of calcium phosphate that was coated onthe water-absorbent polymer particles is given in table 10, calculatedas weight-% of solid calcium phosphate on water-absorbent polymerparticles.

The resulting coated water-absorbent polymer particles were analyzed.The results are summarized in table 12.

TABLE 12 Coating with Calcium Phosphate Base Ca₃(PO₄)₂ CRC AUHL SFCVortex Moisture Example polymer [wt.-%] [g/g] [g/g] [10⁻⁷ cm³s/g] [s][wt. %] 18a Ex. 4 0.50 27.5 22.5 43 52 12.0

Example 19

Example 16 was repeated, but with Lutensol® AT80 (sprayed as a 15 wt. %aqueous solution) instead of an aqueous aluminum sulfate solution. Theamount of Lutensol® AT80 solution that was coated on the polymerparticles is given in table 11, calculated as weight-% of Lutensol® AT80on water-absorbent polymer particles.

The resulting coated water-absorbent polymer particles were analyzed,the results are summarized in table 13.

TABLE 13 Coating with Lutensol ® AT80 Lutensol ® Base AT80 CRC AUHL SFCGBP Vortex Moisture Example polymer [wt.-%] [g/g] [g/g] [10⁻⁷ cm³s/g][Darcies] [s] [wt. %] 19a Ex. 1 0.25 29 19 7 3 30 18.0 19b Ex. 1 0.50 2818 7 2 30 18.5

Example 20

Example 16 was repeated but with a silica dispersion instead of anaqueous aluminum sulfate solution. The type and solids content of thesilica dispersions that was coated on the polymer particles is given intable 14. The amount of silica calculated as weight-% of solid silica onwater-absorbent polymer particles is given in table 14.

The resulting water-absorbent coated polymer particles were analyzed.The results are summarized in table 15.

TABLE 14 Silica Dispersions SiO₂ content Type Name [wt.-%] ProducerAqueous dispersion Aerodisp ® 14 Evonik Degussa GmbH; of a fumed silicaW 1714 Frankfurt am Main; Germany Aqueous dispersion Aerodisp ® 14Evonik Degussa GmbH; of a fumed silica W 7215 S Frankfurt am Main;Germany Aqueous dispersion Aerodisp ® 20 Evonik Degussa GmbH;, of afumed silica W 7220 N Frankfurt am Main; Germany

TABLE 15 Coating with Silica Dispersions Base Silica CRC AUHL SFC GBPVortex Moisture Example polymer Type [wt. %] [g/g] [g/g] [10⁻⁷ cm³s/g][Darcies] [s] [wt. %] 20a Ex. 4 Aerodisp ® 0.50 28.8 22.4 76 56 71 6.4W1714 20b Ex. 4 Aerodisp ® 0.50 28.6 21.6 98 62 75 6.3 W 7215 S 20c Ex.4 Aerodisp ® 0.50 29.2 22.0 53 43 73 6.5 W 7520 N

Example 21

100 g of water-absorbent polymer particles were filled into apolyethylene sample bottle (500 ml volume) and an inorganic solidmaterial was added. The type of inorganic material is given in table 16.The amount of inorganic material is given in table 17. The content ofthe bottle was mixed intensely with a three-dimensional shaker-mixer(Type T2 C; Willy A. Bachofen AG Maschinenfabrik; Basel; Switzerland)for 15 minutes.

The resulting coated water-absorbent polymer particles were analyzed.The results are summarized in table 17.

TABLE 16 Inorganic Solids Type Name Producer Precipitated silicaSipernat ® 50 Evonik Degussa GmbH; Frankfurt am Main; GermanyHydrophobic Sipernat ® D17 Evonik Degussa GmbH; precipitated silicaFrankfurt am Main; Germany Hydrophilic fumed Aerosil ® 200 EvonikDegussa GmbH; silica Frankfurt am Main; Germany Hydrophilic fumedAerosil ® 130 Evonik Degussa GmbH; silica Frankfurt am Main; GermanyCa₃(PO₄)₂ Tricalciumphosphat Chemische Fabrik C53-80 Budenheim KG;Budenheim; Germany

TABLE 17 Coating with Inorganic Solids Base Amount CRC AUHL SFC GBPVortex Moisture Example polymer Type [wt. %] [g/g] [g/g] [10⁻⁷ cm³s/g][Darcies] [s] [wt. %] 21a Ex. 1 Aerosil ® 0.50 31.4 18.7 47 38 58 5.5200 21b Ex. 1 Aerosil ® 0.50 33.6 18.7 45 33 57 5.5 130 21c Ex. 1Sipernat ® 0.20 32.7 20.9 17 10 77 5.1 D17 21d Ex. 4 Ca₃(PO₄)₂ 0.25 27.121.9 38 6 52 10.9 21e Ex. 4 Ca₃(PO₄)₂ 0.50 26.9 22.1 40 7 56 11.2 21fEx. 4 Ca₃(PO₄)₂ 0.75 26.8 21.9 41 10 57 11.0 21g Ex. 5 Aerosil ® 0.5031.6 19.3 40 40 61 7.1 200 21h Ex. 5 Aerosil ® 0.50 32.7 18.6 40 37 627.3 130 21i Ex. 5 Sipernat ® 0.20 31.4 20.9 31 14 86 7.4 D17 21j Ex. 7Aerosil ® 0.50 34.4 19.0 32 34 56 5.7 200 21k Ex. 7 Aerosil ® 0.50 34.020.4 22 20 62 5.8 130 21l Ex. 7 Sipernat ® 0.20 32.9 21.5 17 10 84 6.1D17

Example 22

100 g of water-absorbent polymer particles are coated with an aqueousmetal salt solution according to examples 16 or 17. After coating, theproduct is filled into a polyethylene sample bottle (500 ml volume) andan inorganic solid material was added. The type and the amount ofinorganic material are given in table 18. The content of the bottle wasmixed intensely with a three-dimensional shaker-mixer (Type T2F; WillyA. Bachofen AG Maschinenfabrik; Basel; Switzerland) for 15 minutes.

The resulting coated water-absorbent polymer particles were analyzed.The results are summarized in table 18.

TABLE 18 Coating with a combination of Metal Salt and Inorganic SolidBase Type of Amount Type of Amount CRC AUHL SFC GBP Vortex MoistureExample polymer Metal Salt [wt. %] Inorganic Solid [wt. %] [g/g] [g/g][10⁻⁷cm³s/g] [Darcies] [s] [wt. %] 22a Ex. 5 Aluminum 0.50 Aerosil ® 2000.25 31.0 21.2 74 49 60 8.2 Sulfate 22b Ex. 5 Aluminum 0.50 Aerosil ®200 0.50 31.3 20.3 55 41 59 7.9 Sulfate 22c Ex. 5 Aluminum 0.50Aerosil ® 200 0.75 31.5 20.4 70 42 59 7.6 Sulfate 22d Ex. 5 Aluminum0.75 Aerosil ® 200 0.25 31.2 19.8 48 41 58 8.4 Sulfate 22e Ex. 5Aluminum 0.75 Aerosil ® 200 0.50 30.5 19.7 67 46 59 8.3 Sulfate 22f Ex.5 Aluminum 0.75 Aerosil ® 200 0.75 30.8 19.5 57 50 58 8.3 Sulfate 22gEx. 5 Aluminum 1.00 Aerosil ® 200 0.25 30.3 20.1 62 54 61 8.7 Sulfate22h Ex. 5 Aluminum 1.00 Aerosil ® 200 0.50 30.3 19.9 76 50 61 8.8Sulfate 22i Ex. 5 Aluminum 1.00 Aerosil ® 200 0.75 30.2 19.7 118 54 588.4 Sulfate 22j Ex. 7 Aluminum 0.50 Aerosil ® 200 0.50 32.3 19.1 47 3654 6.9 Sulfate 22k Ex. 7 Aluminum 0.50 Sipernat ® 22S 0.50 32.1 22.0 2525 60 7.2 Sulfate 22l Ex. 7 Aluminum 0.50 Aerodisp ® 0.50 31.4 19.4 3327 62 9.5 Sulfate W1714 22m Ex. 7 Aluminum 0.50 Sipernat ® 50 0.50 32.219.7 29 21 57 6.7 Sulfate 22n Ex. 7 Aluminum 0.50 Sipernat ® 50 0.5032.4 19.6 30 47 73 7.9 Acetate

Example 23

1 kg of water-absorbent polymer particles were filled into a conicalfluidized bed coater (Aeromatic Verfahrenstechnische Anlagen A G;Bubendorf; Switzerland) and were fluidized with preheated air (40° C.).With a two-phase nozzle, a polyvinylamine solution (Lupamin® 9095 andLupamin® 4595, BASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Del.) was sprayed onto thewater-absorbent polymer particles from below within 6 minutes. Theamount of the solution was calculated to 0.25 wt.-% dry polymer based onwater-absorbent polymer particles. The water-absorbent polymer particleswere removed from the coater, sieved through an 850 μm sieve to removepossibly formed agglomerates.

The resulting water-absorbent coated polymer particles were analyzed.The results are summarized in table 19.

TABLE 19 Coating with Polyvinylamine Base Amount CRC AUHL SFC GBP VortexMoisture Example polymer Type [wt. %] [g/g] [g/g] [10⁻⁷ cm³s/g][Darcies] [s] [wt. %] 23a Ex. 5 Lupamin ® 0.25 30.2 18.2 35 73 61 4.84595 23b Ex. 5 Lupamin ® 0.25 30.1 18.3 41 81 63 5.1 9095

Example 24

100 g of water-absorbent polymer particles were filled into apolyethylene sample bottle (500 ml volume) and an inorganic solidmaterial was added. The type and the amount of inorganic material aregiven in table 20. Additionally, polyethylene glycol (PEG 400, Mw 400g/mol) was added to the bottle as antidusting agent. The amount ofpolyethylene glycol is given in table 17, calculate in ppm (parts permillion) based on the polymer particles. The content of the bottle wasmixed intensely with a three-dimensional shaker-mixer (Type T2C; WillyA. Bachofen AG Maschinenfabrik; Basel; Switzerland) for 15 minutes.

The resulting water-absorbent coated polymer particles were analyzed.The results are summarized in table 20.

TABLE 20 Coating with a combination of Inorganic Solids and AntidustingAgent Type of PEG 400 Base inorganic Amount Amount CRC AUHL SFC GBPVortex Moisture Example polymer solid [wt.-%] [ppm] [g/g] [g/g] [10⁻⁷cm³s/g] [Darcies] [s] [wt. %] 24a Ex. 1 Aerosil ® 0.50 300 31.0 18.7 4338 58 5.1 200 24b Ex. 1 Aerosil ® 0.50 300 32.9 19.0 42 33 52 5.5 13024c Ex. 1 Aerosil ® 0.50 900 31.7 18.5 47 38 54 5.2 200 24d Ex. 1Aerosil ® 0.50 900 33.6 18.3 46 33 58 5.5 130 24e Ex. 1 Aerosil ® 0.501500 31.1 18.2 47 38 55 5.4 200 24f Ex. 1 Aerosil ® 0.50 1500 33.1 18.445 33 57 5.5 130

Example 25

Water-absorbent polymer particles prepared in example 8 were mixed withwater-absorbent polymer particles prepared by solution polymerization(Hysorb® M7055; BASF SE; Ludwigshafen; Germany). Hysorb® M7055 has acentrifuge retention capacity (CRC) of 31.6 g/g, an absorption underhigh load (AUHL) of 23.3 g/g, and a saline flow conductivity of 16×10⁻⁷cm³s/g.

The resulting water-absorbent polymer particle mixtures were analyzed.The results are summarized in table 21.

TABLE 21 Mixtures with conventional water-absorbent polymer particlesratio of inventive water- absorbent polymer particles CRC AUHL SFCExample to Hysorb ® M7055 [g/g] [g/g] [10⁻⁷ cm³s/g] 25a 1:2 32.1 22.3 1225b 2:1 33.1 21.4 8

The invention claimed is:
 1. A process for producing water-absorbentpolymer particles by polymerizing droplets of a monomer solutioncomprising a) at least one ethylenically unsaturated monomer which bearsacid groups and optionally is at least partly neutralized, b) at leastone crosslinker, c) at least one initiator, d) optionally one or moreethylenically unsaturated monomer copolymerizable with the monomermentioned under a), e) optionally one or more water-soluble polymer, andf) water, in a surrounding heated gas phase and flowing the gascocurrent through a polymerization chamber, wherein a temperature of thegas leaving the polymerization chamber is less than 130° C., a gasvelocity inside the polymerization chamber is at least 0.5 m/s, and thedroplets are generated by using a droplet plate having a multitude ofbores, and the bores are separated by 10 to 50 mm.
 2. A processaccording to claim 1, wherein the temperature of the gas leaving thepolymerization chamber is from 115 to 125° C.
 3. A process according toclaim 1, wherein the gas velocity inside the polymerization chamber isfrom 0.7 to 0.9 m/s.
 4. A process according to claim 1, wherein aseparation of the bores is from 15 to 30 mm.
 5. A process according toclaim 1, wherein the diameter of the bores is from 150 to 200 μm.
 6. Aprocess according to claim 1, wherein the water-absorbent polymerparticles are postcrosslinked with a compound comprising groups whichcan form at least two covalent bonds with carboxylate groups of thepolymer particles.
 7. A process according to claim 1, wherein thewater-absorbent polymer particles are coated with an inorganic inertsubstance, an organic polymer, a cationic polymer, a polyvalent metalcation, a reducing agent, an antioxidant, a polyol, fumed silica, and/ora surfactant.
 8. A process according to claim 1 wherein the bores areseparated by from 12 to 40 mm.
 9. A process according to claim 1 whereinthe bores are separated by from 14 to 35 mm.